Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Romanian Version of Oral Health Impact Profile in Edentulous Adults
NCT ID: NCT01392456
Last Updated: 2015-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
69 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-06-30
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To validate the Romanian translation of OHIP-EDENT (Oral Health Impact Profile in Edentulous Adults), the short form of OHIP (Oral Health Impact Profile) developed by Allen and Locker for edentulous adults. The OHIP questionnaire is an efficient instrument for assessment of OHRQoL - Oral Health-Related Quality of Life.
2. To compare satisfaction of 69 fully mandibular edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures with three different types of retention: Retentive Anchors, Magnets, Locator.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study on the Efficiency of Three Different Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT01034930
Occlusion and Disocclusion Time in Immediately Loaded Overdentures Supported by Two Splinted Versus Non Splinted Interforaminal Implants
NCT06376019
Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05972538
Oral Health Related Quality of Life and Peri-implant Condition in Single Implant Overdenture
NCT02861313
Ball Vs Locator Attachment in Overdenture Retained by Single Mandibular Implant
NCT02952274
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Implant-retained dentures provide successful long-term outcomes, particularly when used to rehabilitate the edentulous mandible (Assad et al. 2004; Chan et al. 1995; Davis et al. 1999). Results achievable with such prostheses are well known: the degree of stability, chewing efficiency, and ultimately patient satisfaction exceeds the benefits obtained with conventional denture treatment.
However few studies have addressed the perception of treatments outcomes by patients and is critically important to determine whether there are meaningful differences based on the type of retention used (Retentive Anchors, Magnets, Locator).
OHIP-EDENT (Oral Health Impact Profile in Edentulous Adults), the short form (19 items) of OHIP (Oral Health Impact Profile) detects the impact of oral health in the quality of life of patients who wear total prosthesis and include questions addressing masticatory capacity, pleasure of eating, level of comfort and relationship problems.
This questionnaire is validated in several languages but still not available in Romanian.
Material and methods
1. Linguistic and cultural adaptation:
Because the OHIP EDENT had not previously been used in Romania, it was piloted to assess the face and content validity within the target population. The OHIP EDENT was linguistically and culturally adapted to our setting by using the back translation technique (according to guidelines provided by Beaton et al. 2000) in order to maintain cross-cultural equivalence. In this procedure, translations were independently made by two bilingual persons, who then discussed and produced a consensus Romanian version (T1 and T2 produced T12), which was translated back into English by two professional English translator (one native English) who had never seen the original version (BT1 and BT2 versions).
The conceptual equivalence between the original instruments and the back-translated versions was supported by an expert committee (formed by 3 researchers: methodologist, two experts on quality of life studies, and the four translators). The definitive Romanian version was produced after the face and content validity results in the pilot study had been approved by this committee.
2. Pilot study:
Ethical approval and specific written consent were obtained from the relevant authorities before the pilot study were started.
The pilot study was conducted in a convenience sample (n=35) obtained from mandibular edentulous patients who came to the Dental School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania and Concordia Dent Clinic, Bucharest. Participants were clinically examined according to the WHO (World Health Organization) methodology and completed the pilot OHIP EDENT.
The comprehensiveness of the instrument was tested by asking about difficulties in understanding items or frequencies, in order to optimize the face and content validity before the main study.
Reproducibility was evaluated by measuring test - retest reliability. Test-retest reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The sample of 35 respondents fully edentulous was interviewed two weeks after the first interview.
3. Main Study:
Patient satisfaction was assessed with the aid of OHIP-EDENT questionnaire validated initial (with the original denture), after 6 months and at 1, 3, 5 years post overdenture insertion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retentive Anchor Group
23 fully edentulous patients will receive Retentive Anchors (Institute Straumann AG, Basel Switzerland)as retention system for the two implant overdenture.
Insertion of two screw type dental implants
Each patient (of the 69 recruited) will receive 2 screw-type Straumann (Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) standard implants Ø4.1 mm, with SLA surface in the canine region of the mandible with an interconnecting line approaching parallelism with the terminal mandibular hinge axis, in a 1-stage non-submerged procedure according to a strict protocol (Weingart D and ten Bruggenkate 2000).
Magnet Group
23 fully edentulous patients will receive Magnets (Institute Straumann AG, Basel Switzerland)as retention system for the two implant overdenture.
Insertion of two screw type dental implants
Each patient (of the 69 recruited) will receive 2 screw-type Straumann (Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) standard implants Ø4.1 mm, with SLA surface in the canine region of the mandible with an interconnecting line approaching parallelism with the terminal mandibular hinge axis, in a 1-stage non-submerged procedure according to a strict protocol (Weingart D and ten Bruggenkate 2000).
Locator Group
23 fully edentulous patients will receive Locator (Institute Straumann AG, Basel Switzerland)as retention system for the two implant overdenture.
Insertion of two screw type dental implants
Each patient (of the 69 recruited) will receive 2 screw-type Straumann (Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) standard implants Ø4.1 mm, with SLA surface in the canine region of the mandible with an interconnecting line approaching parallelism with the terminal mandibular hinge axis, in a 1-stage non-submerged procedure according to a strict protocol (Weingart D and ten Bruggenkate 2000).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Insertion of two screw type dental implants
Each patient (of the 69 recruited) will receive 2 screw-type Straumann (Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) standard implants Ø4.1 mm, with SLA surface in the canine region of the mandible with an interconnecting line approaching parallelism with the terminal mandibular hinge axis, in a 1-stage non-submerged procedure according to a strict protocol (Weingart D and ten Bruggenkate 2000).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Complains about the stability of the existing mandibular denture satisfactory from a technical point of view.
* Acceptance of a mandibular over-denture retained by two endosseous implants.
* Patients agree to a 5-year follow-up period.
Exclusion Criteria
* Angle class II relationship.
* Physical severe consideration that will affect the minimal invasive surgical procedure or constitute a hindrance for a 5-year follow-up.
* History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.
* History of pre-prosthetic surgery (including bone graft procedures) or previous oral implants.
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland
OTHER
Concordia Dent Srl
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Corina Marilena Cristache
Dr Corina Marilena Cristache, DMD, PhD, senior lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
CORINA MARILENA I CRISTACHE, DMD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CONCORDIA DENT CLINIC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Concordia Dent Clinic
Bucharest, , Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zani SR, Rivaldo EG, Frasca LC, Caye LF. Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses. J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;51(4):535-43. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.535.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
Assad AS, Abd El-Dayem MA, Badawy MM. Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures. Implant Dent. 2004 Dec;13(4):386-94. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000144512.43654.08.
Weingart D, ten Bruggenkate CM. Treatment of fully edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:69-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1069.x.
Chan MF, Johnston C, Howell RA, Cawood JI. Prosthetic management of the atrophic mandible using endosseous implants and overdentures: a six year review. Br Dent J. 1995 Nov 11;179(9):329-37. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808917.
Davis DM, Packer ME. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 May-Jun;12(3):222-9.
Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):401-10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
316/03 & 507-207
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
507-207
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.