Reinforced Staple Line on Leak Rate in Distal Pancreatectomy

NCT ID: NCT01359410

Last Updated: 2017-05-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-06-30

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators propose a randomized, controlled trial of stapled pancreatic transection versus mesh reinforced stapled pancreatic transection. For the duration of the study period, participating surgeons will utilize a standardized staple technique. Either a reabsorbable polytrimethylene carbonate mesh (SEAMGUARD®) or reabsorbable strips of bovine pericardium (PERI-STRIPS DRY®) will be used to reinforce the stapled pancreatic transection line in the test group. In order to have a uniform test method, the investigators will utilize a laparoscopic stapling device for both open and laparoscopic procedures and a uniform staple size (4.8mm).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pancreatic leak remains a significant cause of morbidity and extra cost following distal pancreatectomy. Historically, previous attempts to reduce the leak rate have met with limited success. To examine this problem the investigators propose a randomized, controlled trial of stapled pancreatic transection versus mesh reinforced stapled pancreatic transection. For the duration of the study period, participating surgeons will utilize a standardized staple technique. Either a reabsorbable polytrimethylene carbonate mesh (SEAMGUARD®) or reabsorbable strips of bovine pericardium (PERI-STRIPS DRY®) will be used to reinforce the stapled pancreatic transection line in the test group. In order to have a uniform test method, the investigators will utilize a laparoscopic stapling device for both open and laparoscopic procedures and a uniform staple size (4.8mm). A drain will be placed in the left upper quadrant at the time of resection. Drainage of the pancreatic resection bed is widely accepted and remains our current standard of care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participant's were blinded to the results of the randomization for 6 weeks.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stapled transection with mesh reinforcement

Mesh reinforced staple line (SEAMGUARD® or PERI-STRIPS DRY®)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mesh reinforced staple line (SEAMGUARD)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reinforce the pancreatic transaction with SEAMGUARD®

Stapled without mesh reinforcement (PER-STRIPS DRY)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stapled without mesh reinforcement (PERI-STRIPS DRY®)

Stapled transection without mesh reinforcement

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mesh reinforced staple line (SEAMGUARD)

Reinforce the pancreatic transaction with SEAMGUARD®

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stapled without mesh reinforcement (PER-STRIPS DRY)

Stapled without mesh reinforcement (PERI-STRIPS DRY®)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants must be 18 years or older and able to give consent. Any patient undergoing a distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic or open, will be eligible for randomization.
* No exclusion is provided for primary diagnosis. In the event of a patient undergoing a planned resection of another organ or organs with only a possibility of a distal pancreatic resection (i.e. colectomy, hepatectomy, gastrectomy, nephrectomy), the patient will still be eligible for inclusion in the study. We expect that some patients will be randomized but not resected (ie metastasis identified). A few patients may not be stapled using the study device for technical reasons (ie the stapler does not fit). The data will be analyzed in an intent-to-treatment approach.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William Hawkins, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hawkins WG. To mesh or not to mesh, that is the question: comment on "Use of Seamguard to prevent pancreatic leak following distal pancreatectomy". Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):899. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.34. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19852096 (View on PubMed)

Johnston FM, Cavataio A, Strasberg SM, Hamilton NA, Simon PO Jr, Trinkaus K, Doyle MB, Mathews BD, Porembka MR, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy: review of a single institution's experience. HPB (Oxford). 2009 Feb;11(1):25-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00001.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19590620 (View on PubMed)

Thaker RI, Matthews BD, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM, Eagon JC, Hawkins WG. Absorbable mesh reinforcement of a stapled pancreatic transection line reduces the leak rate with distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Jan;11(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-006-0042-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17390188 (View on PubMed)

Hamilton NA, Porembka MR, Johnston FM, Gao F, Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. Mesh reinforcement of pancreatic transection decreases incidence of pancreatic occlusion failure for left pancreatectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1037-42. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825659ef.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22534422 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.siteman.wustl.edu

Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

06-1192

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preoperative Stent Study
NCT00501176 COMPLETED NA