A Randomized Trial Comparing "Push" Versus "Pull" Technology for Mobilizing Pain Evidence Into Practice Across Different Health Professions

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

675 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain is a problem for many Canadians. Unfortunately, many doctors, nurses, therapists, and psychologists have trouble keeping up to date and applying the latest research that might help patients suffering with pain. This study will determine whether sending alerts about new pain research directly to these health professionals, and providing them with access to accumulated alerts, will help. The study will compare knowledge and decisions made by health professionals about managing pain problems. The investigators will compare physicians, nurses, rehab therapists and psychologists at the beginning of the study and after having access to different ways to find out about new pain research. One group will receive alerts about new pain studies that have been found to be high quality and relevant to patient care, and will be able to search the alerts database. The other group will be able to find the same studies,but must go to the database of research studies to locate them. The investigators will include 670 doctors, nurses, rehab therapists, and psychologists in this study. A process like tossing a coin will determine which way they are able to get pain research information. The investigators will monitor how much information they access and how they apply it to managing pain problems. The investigators expect that reminding health care providers about new research findings directly will help them, since difficulty finding studies and lack of time prevent them from using the latest research. The investigators expect that reminders about the latest research will help them make better decisions about caring for patients' pain.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

N-of-1 Trials Using mHealth in Chronic Pain

NCT02116621

Musculoskeletal Pain Chronic Pain

COMPLETED NA

Evaluation of a Mind-body Based Application for the Treatment of Chronic/Persistent Pain.

NCT05090683

Chronic Pain Migraine Chronic Pain Syndrome

COMPLETED NA

Effectiveness of a Peer-led Pain Management Program

NCT03823495

Randomized Controlled Trial

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an ACT-Based Bibliotherapy Intervention Among Adults Living With Chronic Pain

NCT03924687

Chronic Pain

COMPLETED NA

To Measure Pain Perception With Electronic Pressure Algometer of Different Size Probes : a Healthy Subjects Research

NCT01618942

Pain

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Problem: Pain affects all Canadians during acute injury or disease. Chronic noncancer pain affects 29% of Canadians, half of whom are unable to participate in their usual work/social roles. Pain is the primary reason that patients consult health practitioners. Research has shown the benefits, harms, and costs of numerous interventions for pain, but uptake of this knowledge is far from satisfactory. Optimizing pain care requires ready access and use of best evidence within and across different disciplines and settings.

The Research Question: The purpose of this randomized trial is to determine whether a technology-based "push" of new, high-quality pain research to physicians, nurses, rehabilitation and psychology professionals results in better knowledge and clinical decision-making around pain, when offered in addition to traditional "pull" evidence technology. A secondary objective is to identify disciplinary variations in response to evidence and differences in the patterns of accessing research evidence.

The Study Sample: 670 Physicians, nurses, occupational/physical therapists and psychologists ((80/group X 2 comparison groups X 4 disciplines) + 30 for dropouts)will be recruited through professional associations, websites/conferences and social media. This provides \> 90% power to detect main effects; 80% power for subgroup effects.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are uptake and application of evidence. Uptake will be determined by embedded tracking of what research is accessed during use of the intervention. A random subset of 30 participants/discipline will undergo chart-stimulated recall (CSR) to assess the nature and depth of evidence utilization in actual case management (0, 9 months). A different random subset of 30 participants/discipline will be tested for their skills in accessing evidence using a standardized simulation test (final 3 months). Secondary outcomes include usage and self-reported evidence-based practice attitudes and behaviours (0, 3, 9, 15, 18 months).

Intervention/Methods: Participants who agree to this study of a free literature service will be randomly allocated to Push + Pull versus Pull evidence support. Push + Pull is evidence on pain that is extracted from medical, nursing and rehabilitation journals and appraised for quality and relevance and sent out to clinicians (derived from the successful MacPLUS/Evidence Updates), delivered by e-mail alerts or available for searches of the accumulated database). Pull will be an intervention with a similar front-face but requires clinicians to go to the site and extract evidence from an electronic database. The trial will begin with a 3-month (repeated) baseline, during which average participant use of the standard PULL resource will be monitored. Participants will then be randomly allocated to receive PUSH + PULL or continue to use the PULL resource. After six months, participants will cross over to the alternate intervention for an additional six months. To complete the trial, both groups will finish with three months of PUSH + PULL access.

Analyses: The investigators will use an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), where discipline and setting are covariates to assess differential responses across main effects of Push + Pull vs. Pull. Content analysis of the CSR interview will be use to describe the application of evidence within actual cases.

Impact/Timeliness: The trial will inform our understanding on information preferences and behaviours across disciplines/practice settings. If this intervention is effective, sustained support will come through professional/health system initiatives emerging to optimize pain management in Canada.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Push + Pull

Push + Pull is evidence on pain that is extracted from medical, nursing, psychology and rehabilitation journals, appraised for quality and relevance, and delivered to clinicians by e-mail alerts or available for searches of the accumulated database.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Push + Pull

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Push + Pull is evidence on pain that is extracted from medical, nursing, psychology and rehabilitation journals, appraised for quality and relevance, and delivered to clinicians by e-mail alerts or available for searches of the accumulated database.

Pull

Pull will be an intervention with a similar front-face but requires clinicians to go to the site and extract evidence from an electronic database.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Pull

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Pull will be an intervention with a similar front-face but requires clinicians to go to the site and extract evidence from an electronic database.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Push + Pull

Push + Pull is evidence on pain that is extracted from medical, nursing, psychology and rehabilitation journals, appraised for quality and relevance, and delivered to clinicians by e-mail alerts or available for searches of the accumulated database.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Pull

Pull will be an intervention with a similar front-face but requires clinicians to go to the site and extract evidence from an electronic database.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* licensed physicians, nurses, occupational therapists (OT), physical therapists (PT), or psychologists who see patients at least 1 day/week;
* fluent in English;
* have access to a computer at home or at work which has unrestricted access to the World Wide Web,
* have an active email account