Device Mixing in Asthma, a General Practice Research Database Study

NCT ID: NCT01313585

Last Updated: 2011-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

815377 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

1991-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of asthma management in patients on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance therapy as Easi-breathe® (EB) - beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) breath-actuated inhaler (BAI) - and as-needed (prn) reliever medication (short-acting beta2-agonist \[SABA\] therapy) via either a BAI (i.e. Easi-breathe® \[EB\] salbutamol) or via a pressurised metered dose inhaler (MDI) (e.g. MDI salbutamol).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current asthma guidelines in the UK are underpinned by evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although RCT data are considered the gold standard, patients recruited to asthma RCTs are estimated to represent less than 10% of the UK's asthma population. The poor representation of the asthma population is due to a number of factors, such as tightly-controlled inclusion criteria for RCTs. There is, therefore, a need for more representative RCTs and real-life observational studies to inform existing guidelines and help optimise asthma outcomes.

Inhalation therapy is the cornerstone of asthma treatment, used for the delivery of 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy (e.g. salbutamol) as well as anti-inflammatory corticosteroid 'maintenance' or 'controller' therapy. Currently available inhaler devices include MDIs, breath-actuated MDIs (BAIs), and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Both BAIs and DPIs are actuated by the patient's inhalation manoeuvre, while MDIs are actuated by the patient's pressing of a button, which must thus be coordinated with inhalation. The clinical effectiveness of inhalation therapy derives from delivery of drug to the target sites in the lungs, and evidence is mounting that suboptimal use of inhaler devices is a common problem contributing to compromised asthma control for many patients. Indeed, decreased asthma control has been linked to the number of mistakes when using MDIs for delivering inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).

There is also evidence that the ability of patients to use the different inhaler device types is variable. Nonetheless, recent reviews of RCTs, while recognising the importance of inhaler technique, have concluded that inhaler devices do not differ significantly in efficacy and that the cheapest inhaler device should be used. However, as results are based on RCTs they should be applied with care in light of the aforementioned issues around external validity of RCTs and the ability to extrapolate their findings across a broad patient population. Moreover, patients enrolled in RCTs typically receive extensive training and must demonstrate and maintain proper inhaler technique, seldom accomplished in a real-world setting.

The aim of this study is to compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of ICS (maintenance) plus SABA (reliever) therapy delivered via same-type devices (namely BDP via EB plus salbutamol via EB \[BAI\]) and that delivered via different device types (i.e. BDP via EB \[BAI\] plus SABA via MDI) in a real-life, representative, UK primary care asthma population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IPDA salbutamol MDI

receive a recorded increase in ICS therapy as BDP Easibreathe at the index date and also receive salbutamol MDI

Increase of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via an MDI

Intervention Type DRUG

IPDA salbutamol EB

receive a recorded increase in ICS therapy as BDP Easibreathe at the index date and also receive salbutamol Easibreathe

Increase of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via the Easibreathe device

Intervention Type DRUG

IPDI salbutamol EB

initiate ICS therapy as BDP Easibreathe at the index date and also receive salbutamol Easibreathe

Initiation of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via the Easibreathe device

Intervention Type DRUG

IPDI salbutamol MDI

initiate ICS therapy as BDP Easibreathe at the index date and also receive salbutamol MDI

Initiation of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via and MDI device

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Initiation of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via the Easibreathe device

Intervention Type DRUG

Initiation of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via and MDI device

Intervention Type DRUG

Increase of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via the Easibreathe device

Intervention Type DRUG

Increase of beclometasone via the Easibreathe device plus salbutamol via an MDI

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged: 4-80 years:

* Paediatric cohort (aged 4-11 years), and
* Adult cohort (aged 12-80 years )
* Evidence of asthma:

* a diagnostic code for asthma, and / or
* ≥2 prescriptions for asthma at different points in time during the prior year and/ or
* ≥2 prescriptions for asthma therapies during the outcome year, including ≥1 ICS prescription (in addition to that received at IPD) - IPDI cohort only
* Be on current asthma therapy (for the IPDA cohort only):

* ≥1 ICS prescription in the prior year, and
* ≥1 other asthma prescription during the baseline year.
* Have at least one year of up-to-standard (UTS) baseline data (prior to the IPD) and at least one year of UTS outcome data (following the IPD).

Exclusion Criteria

* had a COPD read code at any time; and/or
* received a combination inhaler in addition to a separate ICS inhaler in the baseline year; and/or
* received a long-acting beta2-agonsist (LABA) in addition to a separate ICS inhaler in the baseline year
* received ICS therapy during baseline year via DPI (in IPDA cohort only).
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Research in Real-Life Ltd

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Research in Real Life

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Price, Prof. MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Company Director

Alison Chisholm, MSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Research Project Director

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

General Practice Research Database

London, London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Herland K, Akselsen JP, Skjonsberg OH, Bjermer L. How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger "real life" population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med. 2005 Jan;99(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15672843 (View on PubMed)

Travers J, Marsh S, Caldwell B, Williams M, Aldington S, Weatherall M, Shirtcliffe P, Beasley R. External validity of randomized controlled trials in COPD. Respir Med. 2007 Jun;101(6):1313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17113277 (View on PubMed)

Appleton SL, Adams RJ, Wilson DH, Taylor AW, Ruffin RE; North West Adelaide Cohort Health Study Team. Spirometric criteria for asthma: adding further evidence to the debate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov;116(5):976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.034.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16275363 (View on PubMed)

Crompton GK, Barnes PJ, Broeders M, Corrigan C, Corbetta L, Dekhuijzen R, Dubus JC, Magnan A, Massone F, Sanchis J, Viejo JL, Voshaar T; Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team. The need to improve inhalation technique in Europe: a report from the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team. Respir Med. 2006 Sep;100(9):1479-94. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16495040 (View on PubMed)

Chrystyn H, Price D. Not all asthma inhalers are the same: factors to consider when prescribing an inhaler. Prim Care Respir J. 2009 Dec;18(4):243-9. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19513494 (View on PubMed)

Giraud V, Roche N. Misuse of corticosteroid metered-dose inhaler is associated with decreased asthma stability. Eur Respir J. 2002 Feb;19(2):246-51. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00218402.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11866004 (View on PubMed)

Lenney J, Innes JA, Crompton GK. Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. EDICI. Respir Med. 2000 May;94(5):496-500. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0767.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10868714 (View on PubMed)

Molimard M, Raherison C, Lignot S, Depont F, Abouelfath A, Moore N. Assessment of handling of inhaler devices in real life: an observational study in 3811 patients in primary care. J Aerosol Med. 2003 Fall;16(3):249-54. doi: 10.1089/089426803769017613.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14572322 (View on PubMed)

Brocklebank D, Ram F, Wright J, Barry P, Cates C, Davies L, Douglas G, Muers M, Smith D, White J. Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11701099 (View on PubMed)

Brocklebank D, Wright J, Cates C. Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering corticosteroids in asthma. BMJ. 2001 Oct 20;323(7318):896-900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7318.896.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11668133 (View on PubMed)

Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, Anderson P, Dhand R, Rau JL, Smaldone GC, Guyatt G; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: Evidence-based guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Chest. 2005 Jan;127(1):335-71. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.1.335.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15654001 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.optimumpatientcare.org

Optimum Patient Care is the Research in Real Life's sister company (a social enterprise organisation)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

003/10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.