Comparing the Efficacy of Bricanyl M2 and Bricanyl M3 at 0.5 and 1.5 mg Dose Levels, to Allow for a Switch From Bricanyl Turbuhaler M2 to Bricanyl Turbuhaler M3

NCT ID: NCT02322788

Last Updated: 2017-01-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

95 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multi-site, phase III, single dose, 4-way cross-over pharmacodynamic study evaluating the efficacy of Bricanyl Turbuhaler M3 compared to Bricanyl Turbuhaler M2 by studying the protective effect on methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in patients with stable, mild to moderate asthma

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will include female and male patients, between 18 and 65 years old, with stable, mild to moderate asthma who are on short acting β2-agonist (SABA) alone, on low dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) (200-400 µg budesonide or corresponding) or on a combination of low dose ICS and long acting β2-agonists (LABA). Approximately 60 patients will be randomised in order to have 49 completed.

The primary objective is to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence between Bricanyl Turbuhaler M3 and Bricanyl Turbuhaler M2 using bronchoprotective effect. Outcome measure: PC20 (Methacholine provocative concentration causing a 20% drop in FEV1). The safety objective is to compare safety of Bricanyl Turbuhaler M2 and Bricanyl Turbuhaler M3. Outcome measure Adverse Events/Serious.

Study period Q1 2015 - Q1 2016.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bricanyl Turbuhaler M2, Active

Terbutaline sulphate powder for inhalation, 0.5 mg terbutaline per inhalation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Terbutaline sulphate

Intervention Type DRUG

Bricanyl Turbuhaler M2

Bricanyl Turbuhaler M3, Active

Terbutaline sulphate powder for inhalation, 0.4 mg terbutaline per inhalation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Terbutaline sulphate

Intervention Type DRUG

Bricanyl Turbuhaler M3

Turbuhaler M2, Placebo

Placebo powder for inhalation

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo for terbutaline sulphate

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Turbuhaler M2

Turbuhaler M3, Placebo

Placebo powder for inhalation

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo for terbutaline sulphate

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Turbuhaler M3

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Terbutaline sulphate

Bricanyl Turbuhaler M2

Intervention Type DRUG

Terbutaline sulphate

Bricanyl Turbuhaler M3

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for terbutaline sulphate

Placebo Turbuhaler M2

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for terbutaline sulphate

Placebo Turbuhaler M3

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Terbutaline sulphate powder for inhalation, 0.5 mg (metered dose) terbutaline per inhalation Terbutaline sulphate powder for inhalation, 0.4 mg (delivered dose) terbutaline per inhalation Placebo powder for inhalation Placebo powder for inhalation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 6 months of documented clinical diagnosis of asthma as defined by GINA 2012 or American Thoracic Society (Expert Panel Report 3 2007) prior to visit 1
* Stable asthmatics on SABA alone, on low dose ICS (200-400 µg budesonide corresponding) or on fixed combination of low ICS/LABA
* At the enrolment visit 1a, the visit baseline FEV1 must be ≥80 % of that predicted normal (NHANES III). For LABA patients the visit baseline FEV1 must be ≥80 % of that predicted normal (NHANES III) at both visit 1a and visit 1b. If not, the patient will be withdrawn from the study
* At the enrolment visits 1a or 1b (LABA patients only) and at the end of run-in period, visit 2, eligible patients should demonstrate an airway responsiveness to methacholine PC20 \<8 mg/mL. If not, the patient will be withdrawn from the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, breast-feeding, lactation, or planned pregnancy during the study. Fertile women not using acceptable contraceptive measures
* Conditions which could alter airway reactivity to methacholine (e.g. pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, viral bronchitis and/or sinobronchitis) within past six weeks
* Exacerbation due to asthma or change in asthma medication during the last 3 months prior to enrolment
* Night time awakenings due to asthma symptoms on 2 consecutive nights during the last 4 weeks prior to enrolment
* Smokers 6 months prior to the study start or with a history of smoking of more than 10 pack years (e.g. 20 cigarettes/day for at least 10 years, or 10 cigarettes/day for at least 20 years, or equal).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Göran Eckerwall, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca Mölndal, Sweden

Leif Bjermer, MD, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Skånes University hospital, Lund

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada Netherlands Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bjermer L, Gauvreau GM, Postma DS, O'Byrne PM, van den Berge M, Boulet LP, Beckman O, Persson T, Roman J, Carlholm M, Schutzer KM, Eckerwall G. Methacholine challenge tests to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence of terbutaline sulfate via different Turbuhaler(R) devices in patients with mild to moderate asthma: Appraisal of a four-way crossover design. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jun;44:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28232118 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D4711C00001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.