Real-world Effectiveness of Combination Therapy in Asthma

NCT ID: NCT01141465

Last Updated: 2010-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

815377 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate and compare the effectiveness of asthma management in patients with evidence of persistent asthma following a switch in asthma therapy to combination inhaled glucocorticosteroid (ICS) / long-acting bronchodilator (LABA) therapy as either: fixed-combination fluticasone propionate / salmeterol (FP/SAL; Seretide®) via pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) or dry-powder inhaler (DPI) plus as-needed (prn) reliever therapy (salbutamol as DPI, BAI or pMDI), or fixed-combination budesonide / formoterol (BUD/FOR; Symbicort®) via DPI plus prn reliever therapy (salbutamol as DPI, BAI or pMDI or bricanyl as DPI). The final analysis plan will define exact comparators and age groups to be studied after reviewing baseline data.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current asthma guidelines in the UK are underpinned by evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although RCT data are considered the gold standard, patients recruited to asthma RCTs are estimated to represent less than 10% of the UK's asthma population. The poor representation of the asthma population is due to a number of factors, such as tightly-controlled inclusion criteria for RCTs. There is, therefore, a need for more representative RCTs and real-life observational studies to inform existing guidelines and help optimise asthma outcomes.

The fixed combination asthma inhalers FP/SAL (as pMDI and DPI) and BUD/FOR (as DPI) are indicated for use in asthma when adequate asthma control is not achieved with low / medium dose ICS therapy and prn reliever therapy (a short-acting beta-agonist \[SABA\]). Fixed combination inhalers are also indicated in patients already adequately controlled on separate ICS/LABA therapy. However, emerging trends in asthma prescribing indicate increasing use of add-on therapies (particularly in the form of combination inhalers) in the early stages of asthma therapy, even as first-line therapy.

The British Thoracic Society (BTS) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines on the management of asthma advise that there is no difference in efficacy between ICS/LABA therapy given as separate or combined inhalers. However, they do note that, once a patients is on stable therapy, combination inhalers have the advantage of guaranteeing that patients do not take their LABA without their ICS.

In practice, there is significant pressure (supported by asthma guidelines) to use the least expensive, effective inhaled therapies available. While the effect of increased use of combination therapies in terms of patient benefits remains uncertain, the impact on treatment costs for the United Kingdom's (UK's) National Health Service (NHS) is unequivocal and, to date, there are limited data available as to the absolute and relative effectiveness of the ICS/LABA combination therapies currently licensed.

There are a number of inhaler delivery devices available for use in asthma management. Whatever therapy is prescribed, optimal treatment response requires effective drug delivery within the airways; selecting the most appropriate delivery device for an asthma patient, therefore, plays an important role in optimising their asthma control. According to the recent BTS/SIGN guidelines, there is currently no evidence of a clinical difference in the effectiveness of therapy delivery via pMDI ± spacer compared with DPI in either adults or children, and more recent DPIs are rated as effective as older DPIs. Effective use of DPIs and pMDI requires entirely different inhalation techniques and there is some debate as to whether patients prescribed different device types for their reliever and preventer medication (requiring different techniques for each) may have poorer disease control than those prescribed the same device type for both preventer and reliever. Combining aerosols (e.g. pMDI preventer plus BAI reliever) is not considered to cause a problem in this respect.

The aim of this study is to compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of currently licensed ICS/LABA combinations - FP/SAL and BUD/FOR (and their available delivery devices) - in children and adults with asthma whose therapy was changed or increased. Consideration will also be given to the effect of reliever therapy inhaler and the effect of consistency of device used (i.e. same or different devices for preventer and inhaler therapies) on asthma control outcomes. Also to be evaluated are the associated impact of inhaler technique review, recorded inhaler handling problems and use of a spacer in conjunction with a pMDI in terms of achieving asthma control outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IPDA FP/SAL DPI

Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL DPI at ≥twice the equivalent BDP-equivalent dose

Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

IPDA FP/SAL MDI

Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL MDI at ≥twice the equivalent BDP-equivalent dose

Fluticasone / salmeterol metred dose inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

IPDI FP/SAL DPI

Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL DPI at equivalent BDP-equivalent dose

Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

IPDI BUD/FOR DPI

Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as BUD/FOR DPI at equivalent BDP-equivalent dose

Budesonide / formoterol dry powder inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

IPDI FP/SAL MDI

Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL MDI at equivalent BDP-equivalent dose

Fluticasone / formoterol metered dose inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

IPDA BUD/FOR DPI

Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as BUD/FOR DPI at ≥twice the equivalent BDP-equivalent dose

BUD/FOR dry powder inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluticasone / formoterol metered dose inhaler

Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler

Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

Intervention Type DRUG

Budesonide / formoterol dry powder inhaler

Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler

Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluticasone / salmeterol metred dose inhaler

Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

Intervention Type DRUG

BUD/FOR dry powder inhaler

Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Seretide MDI Seretide DPI Symbicort DPI Seretide DPI Seretide MDI Symbicort DPI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged: 4-80 years: Paediatric cohort (aged 4-11 years); Adult cohort (aged 12-69 years); Elderly cohort (aged 70-80 years.
* Evidence of asthma: i.e. a diagnostic code of asthma or ≥2 prescriptions for asthma at different points in time during the prior year, including one ICS prescription.
* Be on current asthma therapy: i.e. ≥1 asthma prescriptions in the prior year, and at least 1 other asthma prescription during the same period.
* Have at least one year of up-to-standard (UTS) baseline data (prior to the IPD) and at least one year of UTS outcome data (following the IPD).

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnostic read code for chronic respiratory disease (including COPD) at any time
* On maintenance oral steroid therapy at baseline
* Any patients receiving a combination inhaler in addition to their separate ICS inhaler in the baseline year.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mundipharma Research Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Research in Real-Life Ltd

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Research in Real Life Limited

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Price, Prof. MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Company Director

Alison Chisholm, MSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Research Project Director

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

General Practice Research Database

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Herland K, Akselsen JP, Skjonsberg OH, Bjermer L. How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger "real life" population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med. 2005 Jan;99(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15672843 (View on PubMed)

Travers J, Marsh S, Caldwell B, Williams M, Aldington S, Weatherall M, Shirtcliffe P, Beasley R. External validity of randomized controlled trials in COPD. Respir Med. 2007 Jun;101(6):1313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17113277 (View on PubMed)

Appleton SL, Adams RJ, Wilson DH, Taylor AW, Ruffin RE; North West Adelaide Cohort Health Study Team. Spirometric criteria for asthma: adding further evidence to the debate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov;116(5):976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.034.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16275363 (View on PubMed)

Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, Busse WW, Clark TJ, Pauwels RA, Pedersen SE; GOAL Investigators Group. Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Oct 15;170(8):836-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200401-033OC. Epub 2004 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15256389 (View on PubMed)

British Thoracic Society (BTS) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 101. British Guideline on the Management of Asthma: a national clinical guideline. 2008. Available online at: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/101/index.html

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.optimumpatientcare.org

Optimum Patient Care is the Research in Real Life's sister company (a social enterprise organisation)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BS30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.