Real-world Effectiveness of Combination Therapy in Asthma
NCT ID: NCT01141465
Last Updated: 2010-06-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
815377 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2001-01-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Real-world Effectiveness of Combination Therapies in Primary Care Asthma Management
NCT01242098
Study of Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler
NCT02980133
Study In Airway Physiology In Children SERETIDE DISKUS ® Inhlaer and FLIXOTIDE® Inhaler Are Trademarks of GSK Group of Companies.
NCT00169546
Asthma Comparative Effectiveness Study
NCT01623544
Real Life Effectiveness in Patients With Not Optimally Controlled Asthma
NCT01647646
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The fixed combination asthma inhalers FP/SAL (as pMDI and DPI) and BUD/FOR (as DPI) are indicated for use in asthma when adequate asthma control is not achieved with low / medium dose ICS therapy and prn reliever therapy (a short-acting beta-agonist \[SABA\]). Fixed combination inhalers are also indicated in patients already adequately controlled on separate ICS/LABA therapy. However, emerging trends in asthma prescribing indicate increasing use of add-on therapies (particularly in the form of combination inhalers) in the early stages of asthma therapy, even as first-line therapy.
The British Thoracic Society (BTS) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines on the management of asthma advise that there is no difference in efficacy between ICS/LABA therapy given as separate or combined inhalers. However, they do note that, once a patients is on stable therapy, combination inhalers have the advantage of guaranteeing that patients do not take their LABA without their ICS.
In practice, there is significant pressure (supported by asthma guidelines) to use the least expensive, effective inhaled therapies available. While the effect of increased use of combination therapies in terms of patient benefits remains uncertain, the impact on treatment costs for the United Kingdom's (UK's) National Health Service (NHS) is unequivocal and, to date, there are limited data available as to the absolute and relative effectiveness of the ICS/LABA combination therapies currently licensed.
There are a number of inhaler delivery devices available for use in asthma management. Whatever therapy is prescribed, optimal treatment response requires effective drug delivery within the airways; selecting the most appropriate delivery device for an asthma patient, therefore, plays an important role in optimising their asthma control. According to the recent BTS/SIGN guidelines, there is currently no evidence of a clinical difference in the effectiveness of therapy delivery via pMDI ± spacer compared with DPI in either adults or children, and more recent DPIs are rated as effective as older DPIs. Effective use of DPIs and pMDI requires entirely different inhalation techniques and there is some debate as to whether patients prescribed different device types for their reliever and preventer medication (requiring different techniques for each) may have poorer disease control than those prescribed the same device type for both preventer and reliever. Combining aerosols (e.g. pMDI preventer plus BAI reliever) is not considered to cause a problem in this respect.
The aim of this study is to compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of currently licensed ICS/LABA combinations - FP/SAL and BUD/FOR (and their available delivery devices) - in children and adults with asthma whose therapy was changed or increased. Consideration will also be given to the effect of reliever therapy inhaler and the effect of consistency of device used (i.e. same or different devices for preventer and inhaler therapies) on asthma control outcomes. Also to be evaluated are the associated impact of inhaler technique review, recorded inhaler handling problems and use of a spacer in conjunction with a pMDI in terms of achieving asthma control outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IPDA FP/SAL DPI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL DPI at ≥twice the equivalent BDP-equivalent dose
Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
IPDA FP/SAL MDI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL MDI at ≥twice the equivalent BDP-equivalent dose
Fluticasone / salmeterol metred dose inhaler
Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
IPDI FP/SAL DPI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL DPI at equivalent BDP-equivalent dose
Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
IPDI BUD/FOR DPI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as BUD/FOR DPI at equivalent BDP-equivalent dose
Budesonide / formoterol dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
IPDI FP/SAL MDI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as FP/SAL MDI at equivalent BDP-equivalent dose
Fluticasone / formoterol metered dose inhaler
Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
IPDA BUD/FOR DPI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy during the baseline year (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, initiated combination therapy as BUD/FOR DPI at ≥twice the equivalent BDP-equivalent dose
BUD/FOR dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fluticasone / formoterol metered dose inhaler
Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
Budesonide / formoterol dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at the same BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
Fluticasone / salmeterol dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
Fluticasone / salmeterol metred dose inhaler
Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
BUD/FOR dry powder inhaler
Prescribed at ≥twice BDP-equivalent dose as baseline ICS
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Evidence of asthma: i.e. a diagnostic code of asthma or ≥2 prescriptions for asthma at different points in time during the prior year, including one ICS prescription.
* Be on current asthma therapy: i.e. ≥1 asthma prescriptions in the prior year, and at least 1 other asthma prescription during the same period.
* Have at least one year of up-to-standard (UTS) baseline data (prior to the IPD) and at least one year of UTS outcome data (following the IPD).
Exclusion Criteria
* On maintenance oral steroid therapy at baseline
* Any patients receiving a combination inhaler in addition to their separate ICS inhaler in the baseline year.
4 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mundipharma Research Limited
INDUSTRY
Research in Real-Life Ltd
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Research in Real Life Limited
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Price, Prof. MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Company Director
Alison Chisholm, MSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Research Project Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
General Practice Research Database
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Herland K, Akselsen JP, Skjonsberg OH, Bjermer L. How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger "real life" population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med. 2005 Jan;99(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.026.
Travers J, Marsh S, Caldwell B, Williams M, Aldington S, Weatherall M, Shirtcliffe P, Beasley R. External validity of randomized controlled trials in COPD. Respir Med. 2007 Jun;101(6):1313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
Appleton SL, Adams RJ, Wilson DH, Taylor AW, Ruffin RE; North West Adelaide Cohort Health Study Team. Spirometric criteria for asthma: adding further evidence to the debate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov;116(5):976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.034.
Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, Busse WW, Clark TJ, Pauwels RA, Pedersen SE; GOAL Investigators Group. Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Oct 15;170(8):836-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200401-033OC. Epub 2004 Jul 15.
British Thoracic Society (BTS) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 101. British Guideline on the Management of Asthma: a national clinical guideline. 2008. Available online at: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/101/index.html
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Optimum Patient Care is the Research in Real Life's sister company (a social enterprise organisation)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BS30
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.