Effects of Sulfasalazine on BOLD Response to Alcohol Cues

NCT ID: NCT01312129

Last Updated: 2014-09-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overarching objective of this pilot study is to apply both neuroimaging and pharmacogenetic tools to the study of alcohol dependence. This proposed research will provide a mechanistic test of the function of the genetic variation. The specific aims and hypotheses are to test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment on BOLD difference maps for the contrast alcohol minus control. We will also explore whether specific genetic variations influence this effect. A double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 (Medication: Sulfasalazine 1500 mg vs. placebo control) x 2 (Cue: Alcohol Cue vs. Control cue) within-subjects, crossover design will be used to test the hypothesis that Sulfasalazine reduces the BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Twenty alcohol-dependent participants will complete two rounds of the study medication followed by an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan, during which they will complete an alcohol cue-exposure task. The order of the medication condition will be counterbalanced such that subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Sulfasalazine (1500 mg) in the first session and placebo in the second session one week later (or vice versa). This pilot study will help to determine whether NMDA receptors play a role in cue-elicited activation of key areas of the brain implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Furthermore, if Sulfasalazine reduces cue-elicited activation of these brain regions, as hypothesized; this study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial on the efficacy of Sulfasalazine as a treatment for substance use disorders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overarching objective of this pilot study is to apply both neuroimaging and pharmacogenetic tools to the study of alcohol dependence. This proposed research will provide a mechanistic test of the function of the genetic variation. The specific aims and hypotheses are to test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment on BOLD difference maps for the contrast alcohol minus control. We will also explore whether specific genetic variations influence this effect.

Several recent studies support the premise that genetic differences may predict treatment outcomes. In an early study, an A to G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; rs1799971) of the mu opiate receptor gene (OPRM1) predicted 12 week abstinence after treatment of alcohol dependence with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). The relationship was such that individuals with at least one copy of the G allele demonstrated lower relapse rates and longer time to return to heavy drinking when treated with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). These observations were recently replicated and extended in the multisite COMBINE study, such that individuals with the G allele demonstrated superior outcomes after treatment with naltrexone, in combination with medication management (Anton et al 2008). Laboratory studies have suggested that clinical effects may be related to a greater reduction in the acute rewarding effects of alcohol among individuals with the G allele (Ray \& Hutchison 2007) and suggest that the mechanism may be related to a blunting of dopamine release in the VTA (Ramchandani et al 2009). In addition, recent studies with other medications (e.g., topiramate, olanzapine) have found that genetic variables predict treatment outcomes (e.g., Hutchison et al 2006; Hutchison 2008; Seneviratne et al 2009). It is important to note that these gene by treatment interactions are not limited to pharmacological treatments, as recent studies have also suggested that genetic variation may predict responses to psychosocial interventions as well (Feldstein Ewing et al 2009; Hutchison et al 2006).

We decided to evaluate the clinical effects of Sulfasalazine because our work to date suggests that genetic variations with downstream function implications for glutamate function, specifically cysteine/glutamate exchange and glutamate transport, are strongly associated with BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Sulfasalazine is a medication with a well characterized safety profile that has been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and several types of arthritis, particularly rheumatoid arthritis for many years. Most recently, it has been suggested that Sulfasalazine may have beneficial effects in the brain, specifically by blocking N-methyl D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity resulting in reduced neuronal death (Bo Rum Ryu et al, 2003). This pilot study will help to determine whether NMDA receptors play a role in cue-elicited activation of key areas of the brain implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Furthermore, if Sulfasalazine reduces cue-elicited activation of these brain regions, as hypothesized; this study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial on the efficacy of Sulfasalazine as a treatment for substance use disorders.

To that end, a double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 (Medication: Sulfasalazine 1500 mg vs. placebo control) x 2 (Cue: Alcohol Cue vs. Control cue) within-subjects, crossover design will be used to test the hypothesis that Sulfasalazine reduces the BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Twenty alcohol-dependent participants will complete two rounds of the study medication followed by an fMRI scan, during which they will complete an alcohol cue-exposure task. The order of the medication condition will be counterbalanced such that subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Sulfasalazine (1500 mg) in the first session and placebo in the second session one week later (or vice versa).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alcohol Dependence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sulfasalazine

Sulfasalazine 1500 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sulfasalazine

Intervention Type DRUG

500mg capsules of Sulfasalazine x 3 doses 12 hours apart.

Placebo

Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sulfasalazine

500mg capsules of Sulfasalazine x 3 doses 12 hours apart.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 21-55 years of age with
* Alcohol Dependence

Exclusion Criteria

* Medical or MRI Contraindications
* Pregnancy
* Allergy to Sulfa medications
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Mind Research Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kent Hutchison, Ph.D.

Professor of Translational Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kent E Hutchison, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Mind Research Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Mind Research Network

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-381

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sweet Preference and Alcohol Craving
NCT01296646 COMPLETED PHASE2
Saracatinib and Alcohol Drinking
NCT02955186 COMPLETED PHASE2