Effects of Sulfasalazine on BOLD Response to Alcohol Cues
NCT ID: NCT01312129
Last Updated: 2014-09-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2011-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of N-acetylcysteine on Alcohol and Cocaine Use Disorders: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT03018236
The Tolerability and Effects of AZD0530 in Individuals With or Without a Family History of Alcoholism
NCT02262026
Multimodal Neuroimaging of Alcohol Cues, Cortisol Response, and Compulsive Motivation
NCT04412824
The Role of Brief Potent Glutamatergic Modulation in Addressing Problem Drinking
NCT04084860
Effectiveness of Naltrexone Versus Placebo to Reduce Craving for Alcohol With Evaluation of Genetic Variability.
NCT00366626
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several recent studies support the premise that genetic differences may predict treatment outcomes. In an early study, an A to G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; rs1799971) of the mu opiate receptor gene (OPRM1) predicted 12 week abstinence after treatment of alcohol dependence with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). The relationship was such that individuals with at least one copy of the G allele demonstrated lower relapse rates and longer time to return to heavy drinking when treated with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). These observations were recently replicated and extended in the multisite COMBINE study, such that individuals with the G allele demonstrated superior outcomes after treatment with naltrexone, in combination with medication management (Anton et al 2008). Laboratory studies have suggested that clinical effects may be related to a greater reduction in the acute rewarding effects of alcohol among individuals with the G allele (Ray \& Hutchison 2007) and suggest that the mechanism may be related to a blunting of dopamine release in the VTA (Ramchandani et al 2009). In addition, recent studies with other medications (e.g., topiramate, olanzapine) have found that genetic variables predict treatment outcomes (e.g., Hutchison et al 2006; Hutchison 2008; Seneviratne et al 2009). It is important to note that these gene by treatment interactions are not limited to pharmacological treatments, as recent studies have also suggested that genetic variation may predict responses to psychosocial interventions as well (Feldstein Ewing et al 2009; Hutchison et al 2006).
We decided to evaluate the clinical effects of Sulfasalazine because our work to date suggests that genetic variations with downstream function implications for glutamate function, specifically cysteine/glutamate exchange and glutamate transport, are strongly associated with BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Sulfasalazine is a medication with a well characterized safety profile that has been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and several types of arthritis, particularly rheumatoid arthritis for many years. Most recently, it has been suggested that Sulfasalazine may have beneficial effects in the brain, specifically by blocking N-methyl D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity resulting in reduced neuronal death (Bo Rum Ryu et al, 2003). This pilot study will help to determine whether NMDA receptors play a role in cue-elicited activation of key areas of the brain implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Furthermore, if Sulfasalazine reduces cue-elicited activation of these brain regions, as hypothesized; this study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial on the efficacy of Sulfasalazine as a treatment for substance use disorders.
To that end, a double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 (Medication: Sulfasalazine 1500 mg vs. placebo control) x 2 (Cue: Alcohol Cue vs. Control cue) within-subjects, crossover design will be used to test the hypothesis that Sulfasalazine reduces the BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Twenty alcohol-dependent participants will complete two rounds of the study medication followed by an fMRI scan, during which they will complete an alcohol cue-exposure task. The order of the medication condition will be counterbalanced such that subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Sulfasalazine (1500 mg) in the first session and placebo in the second session one week later (or vice versa).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sulfasalazine
Sulfasalazine 1500 mg
Sulfasalazine
500mg capsules of Sulfasalazine x 3 doses 12 hours apart.
Placebo
Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart
Placebo
Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sulfasalazine
500mg capsules of Sulfasalazine x 3 doses 12 hours apart.
Placebo
Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Alcohol Dependence
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Allergy to Sulfa medications
21 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Mind Research Network
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kent Hutchison, Ph.D.
Professor of Translational Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kent E Hutchison, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Mind Research Network
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Mind Research Network
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-381
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.