Safety And Feasibility Study Of Pressure-controlled Intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PICSO) In Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Native Vessel Intervention

NCT ID: NCT01308125

Last Updated: 2012-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pressure intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PICSO) in patients with coronary artery disease improves collateral flow index to higher than 30%. PICSO used in this patient population is safe, feasible and effective. Safety, feasibility and effectiveness will be tested by periprocedural and logistic data.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1 Background Good collateral flow in case of obstructive coronary artery disease and acute myocardial has beneficial effects on morbidity and mortality. Pressure controlled Intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PICSO) carries a promise of improving myocardial flow, decreasing microvascular obstruction and decreasing the rate of peri-procedural and acute myocardial infarction without the increased risk of bleeding such as is encountered with gp2b3a inhibitors. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PICSO in patients with stable coronary artery disease and experimental short coronary artery occlusion.

2\. Objective The purpose of the study is to determine whether PICSO is safe and feasible with a femoral approach, and in what amount of cases PICSO is effective to increase collateral flow index (CFI). In this study an adapted collateral flow pressure index (CFpI) will be used and is calculated as the ratio of the distal LAD pressure during LAD balloon occlusion (PLADoccl.) and the Aortic pressure (Pao). CFI\>30% has been shown in several studies to be a significant predictor of inducible ischemia as measured by intracoronary ST-segment changes. The study is a non-randomized single centre trial using a Bayesian statistical model.

3\. Specific This study is a study in 10 elective patients with coronary artery disease assessing the safety and feasibility of adjunctive PICSO treatment during PCI using a femoral vein approach.

Together with the preclinical experience using the Miracor technology, we therefore believe that the planned cohort of 10 patients is sufficient to corroborate earlier experiences on the safety of the procedure as well as present technology.

For the effectiveness, 10 sets of measurements before and after the procedure in each patient will provide insight into the clinical significance since each patient will serve as her or his control.

Study end-points

3.1 Primary endpoints

1. Duration from successful femoral vein cannulation until successful placement of PICSO Impulse catheter into the Coronary Sinus.
2. Relative increase in collateral flow pressure index (CFpI) during LAD occlusion with and without PICSO.

3.2 Secondary endpoints

1. Number of patients reaching collateral flow pressure index (CFpI) higher than 30% during PICSO.
2. Quantitative evaluation of pre-condition effect on relative increase of CFpI.
3. The change of ST segment as recorded at Intra coronary ECG measures during balloon inflation.

3.3 Primary safety endpoints

1. The patients are hemodynamic stable during PICSO.
2. Elevation of coronary sinus pressure
3. The 30 days MACE is comparable to other patients undergoing PCI.

1. Stroke
2. Bleeding
3. Inflammation
4. New onset of an acute coronary syndrome or newly documented heart failure, requiring therapy or hospitalization
5. Pulmonary embolism
6. Coronary sinus permanent occlusion
7. Death
8. Other Adverse Events
4. No reported Adverse Events caused by PICSO

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stable Angina

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PICSO

* Baseline (hemodynamic) measurement
* Intra coronary
* Blood sampling
* LAD occlusion: for 3 min or until pain with and without PICSO
* Break recovery: the patient can recover from pain for 3 min
* CFIp: by a ComboWire advanced in the center lumen of an occlusion balloon.
* PICSO: start automatically and continued for 10 min.
* PCI/PICSO: concomitantly for the whole duration of the PCI intervention.
* 24h Follow up: additional blood samples every 6 hours (4 times)
* 30 days follow up.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PICSO Impulse System PICSO Impulse Console PICSO Impulse Catheter

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects (men or women) at least 18 years of age and
* Coronary artery disease as assessed by angiography and
* Clinical indication for PCI and
* Able to understand content of and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Active and or treated malignancies within 12 months prior to Visit 1
* Anatomical complications (e.g. The system in not able to effectively occlude the coronary sinus)
* Presence of significant colleteral flow supplying the target vessel (Rentrop \>1)
* Any significant systemic illness or medical condition that could lead to difficulty complying with the protocol; or any concurrent condition(s) which, in the investigator's opinion, would prohibit the subject from completing the study, or would not be in the best interest of the subject
* Bleeding or perforation during PCI, pericardial effusion and/or hematoma
* Cardiac arrest or arrhythmia requiring chest compressions or cardiopulmonary resuscitation
* Cardiogenic shock (Cardiac Index \<1.8 L/min/meter-squared or as assessed by the investigator), pulmonary edema (Killip Class \>2), or hemodynamic instability as assessed by the investigator at the time of cardiac catheterization
* Clinically significant renal disturbance (sMDRD calculated GFR≤30 mL/min/1,73m2)
* Coronary Sinus electrode in place
* Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction
* Previous Q-wave myocardial infarction in the target area
* History of acute myocardial infarction within 72h prior to screening
* Ejection fraction \<20%
* History of stroke, any sequelae of a transient ischemic attack (TIA), reversible ischemic neurological defect (RIND) within 6 months prior to screening
* Left Bundle Branch Block
* Mitral regurgitation (MR) \> grade I
* Mitral stenosis.
* Patient not currently in sinus rhythm
* Patients on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or scheduled for CRT implantation
* Patients with previous CABG or planned chronic total occlusion revascularization
* Pregnancy or active breast-feeding. Urine pregnancy tests will be performed on all women who are not post-menopausal for at least 1 year
* Registration in another interventional study
* Severe anemia at baseline (Hemoglobin \<10 g/dl or \<6.2 mmol/l)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Miracor Medical SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan J. Piek, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Academic Medical Center Amsterdam

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIP 2009-03 PREPARE PICSO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.