Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Enables Preoperative Detection of Zonular Weakness in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT01298895
Last Updated: 2011-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
224 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-01-31
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome in Myopes
NCT01637740
Long-term Intraocular Lens (IOL) Decentration and Tilt in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome (PES) Following Cataract Surgery
NCT03453827
Subjective and Objective Refraction in Pseudophakic Patients
NCT04319497
Refractive Outcomes After Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome
NCT04783909
Impact of DED on the Accuracy of Preoperative Keratometry Values in the Calculation of IOL Power for Cataract Surgery.
NCT06989827
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEX group
The first group consisted of 47 eyes with cataract complicated with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX).
No interventions assigned to this group
control group
The control group included 177 eyes with uncomplicated cataract in eyes without other ocular pathology
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* must have cataract
* for the PEX group must have cataract complicated with PEX
Exclusion Criteria
* absence of cataract
* presence of other ocular pathology in the control group
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
General Hospital Sveti Duh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eye Clinic, General hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mladen Bušić, Assoc.Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Eye Clinic, General hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
General Hospital Sveti Duh
Zagreb, , Croatia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Busic M, Kastelan S. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Coll Antropol. 2005;29 Suppl 1:163-6.
Scorolli L, Scorolli L, Campos EC, Bassein L, Meduri RA. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: a cohort study on intraoperative complications in cataract surgery. Ophthalmologica. 1998;212(4):278-80. doi: 10.1159/000027307.
Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;93(7):949-53. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.156554. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TT, De Brabander J, Nuijts RM. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;94(1):106-10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161729. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Walti R, Clemetson IA, Tappeiner C, Goldblum D. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer. Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2087-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007.
Liampa Z, Kynigopoulos M, Pallas G, Gerding H. Comparison of two partial coherence interferometry devices for ocular biometry. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010 Apr;227(4):285-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245182. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
Bjelos Roncevic M, Busic M, Cima I, Kuzmanovic Elabjer B, Bosnar D, Miletic D. Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;249(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1509-4. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
Bjelos Roncevic M, Busic M, Cima I, Kuzmanovic Elabjer B, Bosnar D, Miletic D. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;249(1):83-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1546-z. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
Karger RA, Jeng SM, Johnson DH, Hodge DO, Good MS. Estimated incidence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma in Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Glaucoma. 2003 Jun;12(3):193-7. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200306000-00002.
Klein BE, Klein R, Lee KE. Incidence of age-related cataract over a 10-year interval: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2002 Nov;109(11):2052-7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01249-6.
Mccarty CA, Taylor HR. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Australian adults. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 May;129(5):629-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00466-3.
Bayramlar H, Ozden S, Ergin M, Tutarli H. Ultrasonografic measurement of ocular refractive components in eyes with various refractive states. T Klin Oftalmoloji 3:90-94, 1994.
Bartholomew RS. Anterior chamber depth in eyes with pseudoexfoliation. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 May;64(5):322-3. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.5.322.
Kuchle M, Viestenz A, Martus P, Handel A, Junemann A, Naumann GO. Anterior chamber depth and complications during cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):281-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00365-7.
Jünemann A, Martus P, Händel A, Naumann GOH. Ocular dimensions in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmic Res 29:88, 1997.
Kaneda J, Sasaki H, Nagai K, Fujisawa A, Kawakami Y, Sakamoto A, N Takahashi N, Sasaki K. Forward Malposition of the Crystalline Lens in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43, 2002.
Lanzl IM, Merte RL, Graham AD. Does head positioning influence anterior chamber depth in pseudoexfoliation syndrome? J Glaucoma. 2000 Jun;9(3):214-8. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200006000-00003.
Arnarsson A, Damji KF, Sverrisson T, Sasaki H, Jonasson F. Pseudoexfoliation in the Reykjavik Eye Study: prevalence and related ophthalmological variables. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Dec;85(8):822-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01051.x.
Salzmann M. The Anatomy and Histology of the Human Eyeball , trans. E. V. L. Brown. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1912.
Suzuki R, Kurimoto S. Intraocular muscle function in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmologica. 1992;204(4):192-8. doi: 10.1159/000310293.
Naseem A. Cataract surgery in patients with pseudoexfoliation. [Dissertation]. Karachi: College of Physicians & Surgeons :111, 2002.
Yulek F, Konukseven OO, Cakmak HB, Orhan N, Simsek S, Kutluhan A. Comparison of the pupillometry during videonystagmography in asymmetric pseudoexfoliation patients. Curr Eye Res. 2008 Mar;33(3):263-7. doi: 10.1080/02713680801915284.
Repo LP, Naukkarinen A, Paljarvi L, Terasvirta ME. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome with poorly dilating pupil: a light and electron microscopic study of the sphincter area. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996 Mar;234(3):171-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00462029.
Prince AM, Ritch R. Clinical signs of the pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1986 Jun;93(6):803-7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33664-9.
Mohamed NY, Hassan MN, Ali NA, Binnawi KH. Central Corneal Thickness in Sudanese Population. Sud J Ophthalmol 1:29-32, 2009.
Oliveira C, Tello C, Liebmann J, Ritch R. Central corneal thickness is not related to anterior scleral thickness or axial length. J Glaucoma. 2006 Jun;15(3):190-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212220.42675.c5.
Chen MJ, Liu YT, Tsai CC, Chen YC, Chou CK, Lee SM. Relationship between central corneal thickness, refractive error, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and axial length. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;72(3):133-7. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70038-3.
Hepsen IF, Yagci R, Keskin U. Corneal curvature and central corneal thickness in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;42(5):677-80. doi: 10.3129/i07-145.
Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M, Kelly SP, Kwartz J, Henson D, McLeod D. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology. 1999 Nov;106(11):2154-60. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90498-0.
Ganguli D, Roy IS, Biswas SK, Sengupta M. Study of corneal power and diameter in simple refractive error. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1975 Apr;23(1):6-11. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0192/09.01.2009.
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.