Visual Performance of Pseudophakic Patient With Different Intraocular Lenses
NCT ID: NCT01763411
Last Updated: 2016-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-01-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Posterior Corneal Toricity on Refractive Outcome of Pseudophakia
NCT01554761
Visual Performance of New Apodized Diffractive Multifocal IOL With Addition of Plus Three
NCT01027533
Visual Performance of Four Types of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
NCT03454334
Visual Outcomes After Implantation of a New Multifocal Intraocular Lens
NCT01505816
Visual Outcomes After Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation with and Without Digital Assistance
NCT06460389
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Contrast sensitivity was measured using the CSV-1000 HGT instrument (VectorVision, Inc.), which presents a translucent chart divided into 4 cycles with spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree. The background illumination of the translucent chart does not depend on room lighting. All measurements were obtained under mesopic (5 cd/m2) and photopic (85 cd/m2) conditions. The examinations were performed unilaterally at a distance of 2.5 m with Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and an undilated pupil. All measurements were performed under the same conditions.
Patient satisfaction and quality of life were assessed by a simple questionnaire. Patients were interviewed 3 months postoperative. Patients were asked about visual disturbances, visual lifestyle activities, spectacle use, and satisfaction with the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multifocal Spheric Intraocular Lens (Restor SN60D3 IOL)
No Intervention: Multifocal Spheric IOL implantation
No interventions assigned to this group
Monofocal Spheric Intraocular Lens (AcrySof SN60AT IOL)
No Intervention: Monofocal Spheric IOL implantation
No interventions assigned to this group
Multifocal Aspheric Intraocular Lens (Tecnis ZMA00 IOL)
No intervention Multifocal IOL implantation
No interventions assigned to this group
Monofocal Aspheric Intraocular Lens (AcrySof SN60WF IOL)
No Intervention: Monofocal IOL implantation
No interventions assigned to this group
Multifocal Aspheric Intraocular Lens (Tecnis ZMB00 IOL)
No intervention Multifocal IOL implantation
No interventions assigned to this group
Multifocal Spheric Intraocular Lens (Restor SN6AD1 IOL)
No intervention Multifocal IOL implantation
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
55 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Hospital Oftalmologico de Brasilia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wilson Takashi Hida
MD PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wilson T Hida, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Newton J Kara-Junior, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Celso T Nakano, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Patrick Tzelikis, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital Oftalmologico de Brasilia
Mario Augusto D Chaves, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Oftalmologico de Brasilia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Levy P, Haefliger E, Alfonso JF. Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.013.
Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Orti S, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes-Mico R. Refractive and visual results after implantation of the AcrySof ReSTOR IOL in high and low hyperopic eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep-Oct;19(5):748-53. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900511.
Hida WT, Motta AF, Kara-Jose Junior N, Costa H, Tokunaga C, Cordeiro LN, Gemperli D, Nakano CT. [Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of Tecnis ZM900 and Restor SN60D3 diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses]. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008 Nov-Dec;71(6):788-92. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492008000600004. Portuguese.
Chaves MA, Hida WT, Tzeliks PF, Goncalves MR, Nogueira Fde B, Nakano CT, Motta AF, Araujo AG, Alves MR. Comparative study on optical performance and visual outcomes between two diffractive multifocal lenses: AMO Tecnis (R) ZMB00 and AcrySof (R) IQ ReSTOR (R) Multifocal IOL SN6AD1. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 May-Jun;79(3):171-6. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160050.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HOB03012013
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HOB-12/12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.