Comparison of Two Treatment Regimens (Sitagliptin Versus Liraglutide) on Participants Who Failed to Achieve Good Glucose Control on Metformin Alone (MK-0431-403)

NCT ID: NCT01296412

Last Updated: 2017-06-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

653 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-11

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being done to compare the effectiveness and safety of two treatment paradigms (oral sitagliptin with or without glimepiride versus liraglutide with or without increased dosing) for the treatment of participants with Type 2 Diabetes that is not adequately controlled with metformin alone. The primary hypothesis postulated that the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in participants treated with a sitagliptin-based treatment is non-inferior to that of participants treated with a liraglutide-based

treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sitagliptin +/- glimepiride

Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet orally once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride orally for glycemic control.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

sitagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg tablet, orally, once daily.

glimepiride

Intervention Type DRUG

starting dose of 1 mg tablet (up-titrated as needed), once daily, as needed, after Week 12.

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

metformin tablets at a dose of ≥1500 mg per day

Liraglutide

Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

liraglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

0.6 mg by subcutaneous (pen) injection, once daily, on Days 1-7; up-titrated on Day 8 to 1.2 mg daily. At Week 12, dose may be increased to 1.8 mg once daily for participants who did not meet protocol-specified glycemic goals.

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

metformin tablets at a dose of ≥1500 mg per day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sitagliptin

100 mg tablet, orally, once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

liraglutide

0.6 mg by subcutaneous (pen) injection, once daily, on Days 1-7; up-titrated on Day 8 to 1.2 mg daily. At Week 12, dose may be increased to 1.8 mg once daily for participants who did not meet protocol-specified glycemic goals.

Intervention Type DRUG

glimepiride

starting dose of 1 mg tablet (up-titrated as needed), once daily, as needed, after Week 12.

Intervention Type DRUG

metformin

metformin tablets at a dose of ≥1500 mg per day

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MK-0431, Januvia®, Tesavel®, Xelevia®, Ristaben® Victoza® Amaryl® Fortamet®, Glucophage®, Glucophage® XR, Glumetza®, Riomet®, Metgluco®, Glycoran®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
* On stable dose of metformin monotherapy at a dose of at least 1500 mg per day for at least 12 weeks and a hemoglobin A1C ≥7.0% and ≤11.0%.
* Capable of using a liraglutide pen device.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of Type 1 Diabetes mellitus.
* Use of any oral antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) besides metformin, within the prior 12 weeks of screening.
* Cardiovascular disorders within the past 3 months including acute coronary syndrome or new or worsening symptoms of coronary heart disease, coronary artery intervention, stroke, or transient ischemic neurological disorder.
* Impaired liver function.
* Impaired kidney function.
* History of malignancy or clinically important hematological disorder that requires disease-specific treatment (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery) or, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to recur during the duration of the study.
* History of leukemia, lymphoma, aplastic anemia, myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic diseases, thrombocytopenia, or malignant melanoma, regardless of the time since treatment.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant or donate eggs within the projected duration of the study.
* Participation in another study with an investigational drug or device within 12 weeks prior to screening.
* History of hypersensitivity or any contraindication to sitagliptin, liraglutide, glimepiride, or metformin based upon the labels of the country of the investigational site.
* Participation in a weight loss program and not yet in maintenance phase, or starting of a weight loss medication (such as orlistat or phentermine) within the prior 8 weeks.
* Surgery within the prior 4 weeks or major surgery planned during the study.
* Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
* User of recreational or illicit drugs or recent history (within the last year) of drug abuse or increased alcohol consumption.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Charbonnel B, Steinberg H, Eymard E, Xu L, Thakkar P, Prabhu V, Davies MJ, Engel SS. Efficacy and safety over 26 weeks of an oral treatment strategy including sitagliptin compared with an injectable treatment strategy with liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin: a randomised clinical trial. Diabetologia. 2013 Jul;56(7):1503-11. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2905-1. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23604551 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0431-403

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.