A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin and MK0431A in Comparison to a Commonly Used Medication in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (0431-068)(COMPLETED)

NCT ID: NCT00541450

Last Updated: 2017-05-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

492 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-15

Study Completion Date

2010-01-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and MK0431A in comparison to a commonly used medication in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sita/Met FDC

In Phase A (Treatment Day 1 to Week 12), participants were administered 100 mg once daily (q.d.) of sitagliptin and matching placebo to 15 mg pioglitazone q.d. for 6 weeks followed by matching placebo to 30 mg pioglitazone for the next 6 weeks.

In Phase B (Treatment Week 12-Week 40), participants were switched to the Sita/Met Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), which was increased to 50/1000 mg b.i.d. over a period of 4 weeks; as well as matching placebo to 45 mg pioglitazone.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Comparator: sitagliptin phosphate (sitagliptin)

Intervention Type DRUG

sitagliptin 100 mg tablet q.d. orally for a 12-wk treatment period

sitagliptin phosphate (+) metformin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

sitagliptin/metformin HCl (Sita/Met) 50/500 mg b.i.d. orally and then 50/1000 mg b.i.d. orally for a 28-wk treatment period

Matching placebo to pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

matching placebo to pioglitazone tablet q.d. orally, for a 40-wk treatment period.

Participants were administered matching placebo the 15 mg pioglitazone q.d. orally for 6 weeks, followed by matching placebo to 30 mg pioglitazone q.d orally for 6 weeks, followed by matching placebo to 45 mg pioglitazone q.d. orally, up to 40 weeks.

Pioglitazone

In Phase A (Treatment Day 1 up to Week 12), randomized participants in the pioglitazone group were administered 15 mg q.d. of pioglitazone and matching placebo to sitagliptin. At Week 6, participants were up-titrated to 30 mg pioglitazone q.d.

In Phase B (Treatment Week 12 to Week 40), participants were administered 45 mg pioglitazone q.d.; as well as matching placebo to Sita/Met FDC (50/500 increased to 50/1000 b.i.d. after 4 weeks).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Comparator: pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

pioglitazone 15 mg tablet q.d. orally for 6 weeks, followed by 30 mg q.d orally for 6 weeks, followed by 45 mg q.d. orally, up to 40 weeks.

Matching placebo to sitagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

matching placebo to sitagliptin q.d., orally for a 12-wk treatment period.

Matching Placebo to Sita/Met FDC

Intervention Type DRUG

matching placebo to Sita/Met FDC - 50/500 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks and then 50/1000 mg b.i.d. orally for a 28-wk treatment period (Week 12 to Week 40).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Comparator: sitagliptin phosphate (sitagliptin)

sitagliptin 100 mg tablet q.d. orally for a 12-wk treatment period

Intervention Type DRUG

sitagliptin phosphate (+) metformin hydrochloride

sitagliptin/metformin HCl (Sita/Met) 50/500 mg b.i.d. orally and then 50/1000 mg b.i.d. orally for a 28-wk treatment period

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparator: pioglitazone

pioglitazone 15 mg tablet q.d. orally for 6 weeks, followed by 30 mg q.d orally for 6 weeks, followed by 45 mg q.d. orally, up to 40 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo to pioglitazone

matching placebo to pioglitazone tablet q.d. orally, for a 40-wk treatment period.

Participants were administered matching placebo the 15 mg pioglitazone q.d. orally for 6 weeks, followed by matching placebo to 30 mg pioglitazone q.d orally for 6 weeks, followed by matching placebo to 45 mg pioglitazone q.d. orally, up to 40 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo to sitagliptin

matching placebo to sitagliptin q.d., orally for a 12-wk treatment period.

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Placebo to Sita/Met FDC

matching placebo to Sita/Met FDC - 50/500 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks and then 50/1000 mg b.i.d. orally for a 28-wk treatment period (Week 12 to Week 40).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MK0431, Januvia™ MK-0431A, Janumet™ Actos®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients between the ages of 18 and 78 with type 2 diabetes mellitus
* Patient has not been on any antihyperglycemic agent (Insulin or oral) in the last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has a history of type 1 diabetes mellitus or a history of ketoacidosis
* Patient has previously been treated with sitagliptin or has previously been in a study using a DPP-4 inhibitor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

78 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Monitor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perez-Monteverde A, Seck T, Xu L, Lee MA, Sisk CM, Williams-Herman DE, Engel SS, Kaufman KD, Goldstein BJ. Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and the fixed-dose combination of sitagliptin and metformin vs. pioglitazone in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Sep;65(9):930-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02749.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21849007 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007_501

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

0431-068

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.