Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Two Treatment Regimens (Sitagliptin Versus Liraglutide) on Participants Who Failed to Achieve Good Glucose Control on Metformin Alone (MK-0431-403) (NCT NCT01296412)

NCT ID: NCT01296412

Last Updated: 2017-06-09

Results Overview

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

653 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and Week 26

Results posted on

2017-06-09

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Overall Study
STARTED
326
327
Overall Study
COMPLETED
275
257
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
51
70

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
8
29
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
1
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
10
7
Overall Study
Non-compliance with study drug
1
2
Overall Study
Other reason not specified
20
15
Overall Study
Physician Decision
1
3
Overall Study
Pregnancy
0
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
10
13

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison of Two Treatment Regimens (Sitagliptin Versus Liraglutide) on Participants Who Failed to Achieve Good Glucose Control on Metformin Alone (MK-0431-403)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
n=326 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
n=327 Participants
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Total
n=653 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=5 Participants
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=7 Participants
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
148 Participants
n=5 Participants
147 Participants
n=7 Participants
295 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
178 Participants
n=5 Participants
180 Participants
n=7 Participants
358 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hemoglobin A1c (A1C)
8.2 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
8.1 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=7 Participants
8.2 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
Fasting Plasma Glucose
174.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.7 • n=5 Participants
172.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.8 • n=7 Participants
173.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.3 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Population: Per-protocol population defined as participants who had a measurement at baseline and a measurement after at least 24 weeks (i.e., 168 days) of treatment, and did not have any major protocol violations.

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
n=269 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
n=253 Participants
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C)
-1.32 percent
95% Confidence Interval 1.06 • Interval -1.42 to -1.23
-1.42 percent
95% Confidence Interval 1.04 • Interval -1.51 to -1.32

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Population: Per-protocol population defined as participants who had a measurement at baseline and a measurement after at least 24 weeks (i.e., 168 days) of treatment, and did not have any major protocol violations.

Change from baseline at Week 26 is defined as Week 26 minus Week 0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
n=269 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
n=252 Participants
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
-33.7 mg/dL
95% Confidence Interval 46.2 • Interval -37.5 to -29.9
-39.6 mg/dL
95% Confidence Interval 40.3 • Interval -43.6 to -35.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: Per-protocol population defined as participants who had a measurement at baseline and a measurement after at least 24 weeks (i.e., 168 days) of treatment, and did not have any major protocol violations.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
n=269 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
n=253 Participants
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Percentage of Participants Reaching A1C Goal of <7.0%
62.8 percentage of participants
72.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: Per-protocol population defined as participants who had a measurement at baseline and a measurement after at least 24 weeks (i.e., 168 days) of treatment, and did not have any major protocol violations.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
n=269 Participants
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
n=253 Participants
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Percentage of Participants Reaching A1C Goal of <6.5%
33.8 percentage of participants
38.3 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride

Serious events: 17 serious events
Other events: 58 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Liraglutide

Serious events: 12 serious events
Other events: 97 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
n=326 participants at risk
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
n=324 participants at risk
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
General disorders
Accidental death
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Infections and infestations
Cholecystitis infective
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniocerebral injury
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.61%
2/326 • Number of events 2
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Sternal fracture
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subcutaneous hematoma
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Investigations
Prostatic specific antigen increased
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle haemorrhage
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma stage I
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 2
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric stenosis
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract obstruction
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchitis chronic
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Emphysema
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
0.00%
0/326
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.31%
1/324 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Vascular disorders
Blue toe syndrome
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
0.31%
1/326 • Number of events 1
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
0.00%
0/324
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Sitagliptin +/- Glimepiride
n=326 participants at risk
Sitagliptin 100 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
n=324 participants at risk
Liraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
2.1%
7/326 • Number of events 9
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
10.8%
35/324 • Number of events 42
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
3.1%
10/326 • Number of events 13
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
19.4%
63/324 • Number of events 73
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.8%
6/326 • Number of events 10
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
6.5%
21/324 • Number of events 25
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
1.2%
4/326 • Number of events 4
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
6.5%
21/324 • Number of events 21
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
12.6%
41/326 • Number of events 89
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.
4.6%
15/324 • Number of events 31
Safety analyses were performed on the all participants as treated population (defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy). Participants were included in the reporting group corresponding to the actual study treatment received. Three participants randomized to therapy did not receive any study therapy.

Additional Information

Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

Phone: 1-800-672-6372

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The sponsor must have the opportunity to review all proposed abstracts, manuscripts, or presentations regarding this study 60 days prior to submission for publication/presentation. Any information identified by the sponsor as confidential must be deleted prior to submission.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER