Role of Antibiotics in Preventing Infection in Babies Born Through Meconium Stained Liquor
NCT ID: NCT01290003
Last Updated: 2015-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-06-30
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Piperacillin-tazobactam in Neonates
NCT00873327
Antibiotic Therapy for Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis
NCT03932123
Efficacy And Safety Of Short Course Antibiotic Therapy In Preterm Neonates With Early Onset Sepsis
NCT06197269
A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating if Antibiotic Use in the First 48 Hours of Life Adversely Impacts the Preterm Infant Microbiome
NCT02477423
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Antibiotic Exposure in Neonatal Sepsis Using Neutrophil CD64
NCT01825421
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The routine use of antibiotics in MSAF babies has been advocated for a long time as a part of the conventional treatment. Meconium passage in utero is hypothesized to represent a response to fetal bacterial infection in addition to intrauterine hypoxia. Additionally the rationale for use of antibiotics includes the radiographic similarity of MAS to bacterial pneumonia, in vitro enhancement of bacterial growth in presence of meconium as well as the possibility of meconium induced inhibition of phagocytic activity and respiratory burst response by alveolar macrophages rendering patients with MAS more susceptible to infection. These recommendations however are empirical and the incidence of bacterial infection in neonates born through MSAF as well as in MAS has not been systematically evaluated, to date. With the rising concern about the emergence of resistant strains in neonatal ICUs and the possible side effects of antibiotics (like amino glycosides) including nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity in neonates, a systematically conducted, randomized controlled trial is necessary to assess the utility of antibiotics in the routine management of infants with MSAF and MAS. Hence the purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical course, complications, and infection related outcomes in cases of MSAF and MAS, treated with or without antibiotics therapy
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Antibiotic Group
Neonates randomized to intervention Group(Antibiotic group)will receive the first line antibiotics (Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Amikacin) as per the unit policy for 72 hours. These neonates will also be monitored by performing sepsis screens and blood culture for development of sepsis.
Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Amikacin
Inj Piperacillin-Tazobactam 50 mg/Kg/dose 12 hourly IV X 3 days (6 doses) Inj Amikacin 15 mg/kg/dose 24 hourly IV X 3 days (3 doses)
No Antibiotic Group
Neonates randomized to 'No antibiotic group' will receive supportive treatment as per standard unit protocol. These neonates will be monitored by performing sepsis screens and blood culture for development of sepsis.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Amikacin
Inj Piperacillin-Tazobactam 50 mg/Kg/dose 12 hourly IV X 3 days (6 doses) Inj Amikacin 15 mg/kg/dose 24 hourly IV X 3 days (3 doses)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meconium staining of amniotic fluid
* Cephalic presentation
* Singleton pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal of consent
30 Minutes
2 Hours
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lady Hardinge Medical College
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sushma Nangia, M.D.
Professor Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sushma Nangia, MBBS, MD, DM
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kalawati Saran children's Hospital, Lady Hardinge Medical College
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Goel A, Nangia S, Saili A, Garg A, Sharma S, Randhawa VS. Role of prophylactic antibiotics in neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF)--a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Feb;174(2):237-43. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2385-4. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LHMC/054/Ab-Pro-M
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.