ALternate Site Cardiac ReSYNChronization (ALSYNC) Study

NCT ID: NCT01277783

Last Updated: 2019-06-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

138 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The ALternate site cardiac reSYNChronization (ALSYNC) study, a non-comparative, prospective, non-randomized, multi-national clinical investigation.

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and performance of the investigational atrial transseptal endocardial LV lead delivery system and the implant procedure for delivering the SelectSecure® Model 3830 lead into the Left Ventricle via a superior approach, and to evaluate the performance of the SelectSecure® Model 3830 lead in the Left Ventricle.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and the risk of heart failure decompensation and improves quality of life in indicated patients. However, many do not benefit due to failure to deliver the left ventricular (LV) lead via coronary sinus (5-10%) or lack of symptomatic improvement (30-40%).

The purpose of the ALSYNC Study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LV endocardial (LVE) pacing using a Model 3830 lead implanted by a novel pectoral atrial transseptal lead delivery system.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endocardial Left Ventricular pacing

All patients will undergo the intervention, and are followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (minimum) and biannually thereafter until 1 year after enrollment of the last patient.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endocardial Left Ventricular pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects receive an endocardial LV lead placement via superior approach using Medtronic Model 3830 lead and Medtronic Model 6227ATS deflectable delivery catheter and Medtronic Model 6248HS, 6248JL, or 6248JS delivery catheter, using trans esophageal echo (TEE) or intra-cardiac echo (ICE) to guide the procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endocardial Left Ventricular pacing

Subjects receive an endocardial LV lead placement via superior approach using Medtronic Model 3830 lead and Medtronic Model 6227ATS deflectable delivery catheter and Medtronic Model 6248HS, 6248JL, or 6248JS delivery catheter, using trans esophageal echo (TEE) or intra-cardiac echo (ICE) to guide the procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy candidate/recipient with:
* Failed Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy implant or required CRT replacement without viable access to Coronary sinus or,
* Sub-optimal Coronary sinus anatomy per investigator discretion or,
* Worsened or unchanged clinical status after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy implant
* Patients able and willing to take optimal Vitamin K antagonist therapy (International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2-4)
* Patients willing to sign and date the Patient Informed Consent form
* Patients 18 years of age or older
* Patients able and willing to comply with the protocol, and is expected to remain available for follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients having contraindications to Vitamin K antagonist therapy
* Patients contraindicated for \< 100 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate
* Patients unable to tolerate an urgent thoracotomy
* Documented (previous) ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
* Patients with known previous atrial septal defect closure, or history of mural thrombus that has not been resolved
* Patients with documented atrial fibrillation AND increased stroke risk as determined by the Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age(2), Diabetes, Stroke(2), Vascular disease, Age, and Sex Category (CHA2DS2-VASc) Score of equal to or greater than 5
* Patients with unstable angina pectoris or who have had an acute myocardial infarct within the past 30 days
* Patients with known atrial septum defect (ASD) and/or left superior vena cava
* Patient with known internal carotid artery stenosis of greater than 50%
* Patients diagnosed with peripheral artery disease that are expected to undergo stenting within the next three months
* Patients who have had a Coronary artery bypass graft or stent within the past three months
* Patients with history of mitral or aortic valve repair or replacement
* Post heart transplant patients (patients waiting for heart transplant are allowed in the study)
* Patients currently undergoing dialysis treatment
* Patients with ongoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy that may have an effect on cardiac function
* Patients with ongoing Adverse Events from a previous Left Ventricle lead implant attempt
* Patients enrolled in any concurrent drug and/or device study that may confound the results of this study
* Patients who are not expected to survive more than twelve months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Professor John Morgan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Spire Southampton Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AZ Sint-Jan - Campus Sint-Jan

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Regional de la Citadelle

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Saint Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre - University Campus

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hôpital Haut-Lévêque - CHU de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHU Grenoble Hôpital Michalon

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU de Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Semmelweis Egyetem AOK

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico Sant' Orsola - Malpighi

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Presidio Ospedaliero Alessandro Manzoni

Lecco, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Complesso Ospedaliero San Filippo Neri Ospedale San Filippo Neri

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht (AZM)

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Golden Jubilee National Hospital

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - The Heart Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton General Hospital

Southhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Canada France Hungary Italy Netherlands United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Biffi M, Defaye P, Jais P, Ruffa F, Leclercq C, Gras D, Yang Z, Gerritse B, Ziacchi M, Morgan JM; ALSYNC Investigators. Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study. Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 15;259:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.030.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29579617 (View on PubMed)

Morgan JM, Biffi M, Geller L, Leclercq C, Ruffa F, Tung S, Defaye P, Yang Z, Gerritse B, van Ginneken M, Yee R, Jais P; ALSYNC Investigators. ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2118-27. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv723. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26787437 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ALSYNC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LV Only MPP With SyncAV
NCT03567096 COMPLETED NA
Cardiac Resynchronisation Study
NCT01213537 COMPLETED
Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study
NCT02004873 COMPLETED NA