Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) and DEXA to Evaluate Fixation and Wear of the Restoration ADM Acetabular System

NCT ID: NCT01273324

Last Updated: 2021-08-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The dual mobility design concept for acetabular liners, as is used in the Restoration ADM Acetabular System, has been applied in various implants since its introduction by Gilles Bousquet in France in 1976. Dual mobility cups have shown good clinical results and have been particularly lauded for low incidence of dislocations. However, the wear performance of this design concept has not been proven to date. As wear particles are a possible contributing factor in aseptic loosening, the assessment of wear and fixation is an important step in proving this implant design.

The proposed study will combine RSA and peri-prosthetic bone mineral density as well as outcome questionnaires to provide a complete in vivo evaluation of prosthesis fixation, polyethylene wear, and objective and subjective outcomes for the Restoration ADM Acetabular System.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Question 1: a) Do the implant components of the Restoration ADM Acetabular System achieve adequate fixation to the underlying bone? Null Hypothesis: There is no significant increase in micromotion of the implant components after 1 year indicating adequate long-term fixation at the implant - bone interface. Alternative Hypothesis: There is a significant increase in micromotion of of the implant components after 1 year indicating inadequate fixation at the implant - bone interface. b) What are the migration patterns (translations and rotations) of the Restoration ADM Acetabular System components during the first three years postoperatively? c) For what proportion of implants does migration continue to increase during the three year follow-up? d) Are inducible displacements, measured during weight-bearing follow-up exams, consistent over time and do they indicate that adequate fixation has been achieved? e) Are there significant differences in migration patterns (translations and rotations) between the Restoration ADM Acetabular System components and other implants previously studied with RSA and reported in the literature? Question 2: a) How much does the femoral head wear into the polyethylene liner?b)How much backside wear occurs on the polyethylene liner? c)How does the total wear compare to that with other implants previously reported in the literature? Question 3: Does the polyethylene liner demonstrate mobile bearing properties? Question 4: a) Are there changes over time in bone mineral density of peri-prosthetic bone with the Restoration ADM Acetabular System components? b) Where do changes in bone mineral density occur? Question 5: Does total hip arthroplasty using the Restoration ADM Acetabular System result in significant improvement in health status and functional outcome?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ADM

ADM Cup

ADM Cup

Intervention Type DEVICE

ADM Cup

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ADM Cup

ADM Cup

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Styrker ADM Acetabular Cup

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip indicating primary total hip arthroplasty
2. Between the ages of 21 and 80 inclusive
3. Patients willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements and self-evaluations
4. Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Inflammatory arthritis
2. BMI \>40
3. Post-traumatic arthritis of the hip
4. Prior arthroplasty with the affected hip
5. Hip dysplasia
6. Active or prior infection
7. Medical condition precluding major surgery
8. Severe osteoporosis or osteopenia
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dalhousie University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Dunbar

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Dunbar, MD, FRCSC, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dalhousie University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Capital District Health Authority

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDHA-RS/2012-079

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bone Fixation of Mpact Double Mobility Cup
NCT02850575 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
RSA - ACTIS Hip Stem
NCT04879732 COMPLETED NA
REDAPT Revision Hip System With RSA
NCT04541693 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
BC Study of G7 Cup and Compatible Femoral Stems
NCT03456622 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING