Imprime PGG, Alemtuzumab, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With High Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT01269385

Last Updated: 2020-06-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as alemtuzumab and rituximab, can kill chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells and are effective therapies for this disease. Biological therapies, such as Imprime PGG (poly-(1-6)-beta-glucotriosyl-(1-3)-beta-glucopyranose), may stimulate the immune system in different ways and help monoclonal antibodies kill CLL cells. Giving PGG beta-glucan together with alemtuzumab and rituximab could make therapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as alemtuzumab and rituximab, more effective.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of PGG beta-glucan when given together with alemtuzumab and rituximab and to see how well it works in treating patients with earlier stage high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine the maximum tolerated dose of PGG beta glucan in combination with alemtuzumab and rituximab. (Phase I) II. Assess the rate of complete response of patients with high-risk, early-intermediate stage CLL who are treated with alemtuzumab, rituximab, and PGG beta glucan before meeting standard National Cancer Institute-International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (NCI-IWCLL) criteria (Hallek, Cheson et al. 2008) for treatment. (Phase II)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To monitor and assess toxicity of this regimen. II. Clinical evaluation of toxicity. III. Serial monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

IV. To assess the rate of overall response in CLL patients using this treatment regimen.

V. To determine time to progression, time to next treatment, and duration of response in CLL patients using this treatment regimen.

TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the correlation between the individual prognostic markers (17p-, 11q-, unmutated VH gene, use of VH3-21, ZAP70+, CD38+) and clinical outcome.

II. To assess response to this combination regimen using an expanded definition of response, including bone marrow studies with immunohistochemical studies for residual CLL cells and sensitive flow cytometry for minimal residual disease in patients in complete clinical remission.

OUTLINE: This is phase I, dose-escalation study of PGG beta-glucan followed by a phase II study.

Patients receive PGG beta-glucan intravenously (IV) over 2-4 hours on days 1, 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31; alemtuzumab subcutaneously (SC) on days 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 26, 29, 31, and 33; and rituximab IV on days 10, 17, 24, and 31. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up monthly for 3 months, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Stage 0 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Stage I Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Stage II Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I

Patients receive PGG beta-glucan IV over 2-4 hours on days 1, 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31; alemtuzumab subcutaneously on days 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 26, 29, 31, and 33; and rituximab IV on days 10, 17, 24, and 31. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

alemtuzumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Given subcutaneously

rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Given IV

PGG beta-glucan

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

flow cytometry

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

laboratory biomarker analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

DNA analysis

Intervention Type GENETIC

Correlative studies

fluorescence in situ hybridization

Intervention Type GENETIC

Correlative studies

polymerase chain reaction

Intervention Type GENETIC

Correlative studies

polymorphism analysis

Intervention Type GENETIC

Correlative studies

mutation analysis

Intervention Type GENETIC

Correlative studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

alemtuzumab

Given subcutaneously

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

rituximab

Given IV

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

PGG beta-glucan

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

flow cytometry

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

laboratory biomarker analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

DNA analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type GENETIC

fluorescence in situ hybridization

Correlative studies

Intervention Type GENETIC

polymerase chain reaction

Correlative studies

Intervention Type GENETIC

polymorphism analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type GENETIC

mutation analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type GENETIC

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody Campath-1H MoAb CD52 Monoclonal Antibody Campath-1H Monoclonal Antibody CD52 IDEC-C2B8 IDEC-C2B8 monoclonal antibody Mabthera MOAB IDEC-C2B8 Rituxan Imprime PGG fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) PCR

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of CLL (Hallek, Cheson et al. 2008) manifested by: Minimum threshold peripheral lymphocyte count of 5 x 10\^9/L AND immunophenotypic demonstrations of a population of B lymphocytes (as defined by CD19+) which are monoclonal (light chain exclusion); CLL will be diagnosed if these cells have \>= 3 of the following characteristics: CD5+, CD23+, dim surface light chain expression, dim surface CD20 expression AND fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis is negative for IGH/CCND1 and/or immunostaining is negative for cyclin D1 expression
* \>= 1 of the following poor prognosis factors: unmutated IGHV (\< 2%) AND CD38 expression (\>= 30% cells positive on flow cytometry); unmutated IGHV (\< 2%) AND ZAP-70 expression (\>= 20% cells positive on flow cytometry); use of VH3-21 gene segment irrespective of mutation status AND CD38 expression (\>= 30% cells positive on flow cytometry); use of VH3-21 gene segment irrespective of mutation status AND ZAP-70 expression (\>= 20% cells positive on flow cytometry); 11q22-; 17p13-
* Rai classification Stage 0, I or II that does not meet standard NCI-IWCLL criteria for treatment of CLL (Hallek, Cheson et al. 2008)
* Limited CLL disease burden with no lymph nodes \> 5 cm in any diameter and splenomegaly \< 6 cm below left costal margin in midclavicular line at rest
* Creatinine =\< 1.5 x upper normal limit (UNL)
* Total bilirubin =\< 3.0 x UNL; if total is elevated, a direct bilirubin should be performed and should be =\< 1.5 x UNL
* AST =\< 3.0 x UNL
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS): 0, 1, or 2
* Negative serum pregnancy test done =\< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
* Provide informed written consent
* Willing to return to a Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) enrolling institution for follow-up
* Willing to provide blood samples for correlative research purposes

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Nursing women
* Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception
* New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart disease
* Recent myocardial infarction (\< 1 month)
* Uncontrolled infection
* Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), serological evidence of active hepatitis B infection (HBsAg or HBeAg positive) or positive hepatitis C serology, as further severe immunosuppression with this regimen may occur
* Evidence of active autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, or pure red blood cell aplasia
* Other active primary malignancy requiring treatment or limits survival to =\< 2 years
* Any major surgery =\< 4 weeks prior to registration
* Any previous chemotherapy or monoclonal antibody treatment for CLL
* Current use of corticosteroids; NOTE: previous corticosteroids are allowed
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Ansell, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2010-02329

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LS1084

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

10-003025

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LS1084

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.