Tivantinib Plus Erlotinib Versus Placebo Plus Erlotinib for the Treatment of Non-squamous, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01244191

Last Updated: 2021-04-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1048 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-11

Study Completion Date

2012-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to determine if the combination regimen of tivantinib with erlotinib will improve overall survival relative to erlotinib alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer who have received 1 or 2 prior systemic anti-cancer therapies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non Squamous, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tivantinib and erlotinib

Tivantinib 720 mg daily (360 mg twice a day) in combination with 150 mg of erlotinib, given once a day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tivantinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Tivantinib 720 mg daily as 3 x 120 mg oral tablets given twice a day

Erlotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets, given once a day

Placebo and erlotinib

Tivantinib placebo given twice a day in combination with 150 mg of erlotinib, given once a day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Tivantinib Placebo tablets given twice a day

Erlotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets, given once a day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tivantinib

Tivantinib 720 mg daily as 3 x 120 mg oral tablets given twice a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Tivantinib Placebo tablets given twice a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Erlotinib

Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets, given once a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ARQ197 No drug

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed surgically unresectable locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
* Measurable disease and documented disease progression following last prior therapy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, Version 1.1.
* Have received one or two prior lines of systemic anti-cancer therapy therapy for advanced or metastatic disease, one of which must be a platinum-doublet therapy. Patients who received only adjuvant treatment will be eligible only if disease progression occurred \<6 months after completion of adjuvant therapy. Prior maintenance therapy is allowed and will be considered as the same line of therapy when continued without discontinuation after initiation of a treatment regimen.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
* Resolution of any toxic effects of prior therapy (including radiotherapy) according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0, Grade ≤1 (with the exception of alopecia and ≤grade 2 neuropathy). Subject must have recovered from significant surgery-related complications.
* Demonstrate adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal functions, defined as:
* ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) in subjects with no liver metastasis and ≤5.0 x ULN in subjects with liver metastasis.
* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN (≤ 4 × ULN total and ≤1.5 × ULN direct bilirubin is acceptable for subjects with Gilbert's syndrome).
* ANC ≥1.5 × 10\^9/L.
* Platelet count ≥100 × 10\^9/L.
* Hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL (transfusion and/or growth factor support allowed).
* Serum creatinine ≤1.5 × ULN or creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min.
* Archival and/or fresh biopsy tissue sample must be available for biomarker determination. The status of the following biomarkers will be collected in this study: EGFR and KRAS mutation status prior to randomization, and MET status post randomization
* If of child-bearing/reproductive potential (female or male), must agree to use double-barrier contraceptive measures, oral contraception, or avoidance of intercourse during the study and for 90 days after last investigational drug dose received
* If female and of childbearing potential, must have a negative result of a pregnancy test (serum or urine) within 72 hours prior to initiating study treatment.
* Must have signed and dated an approved Informed Consent Form (Including HIPAA authorization, if applicable) before performance of any study-specific procedures or tests. Subjects must be fully informed about their illness and the investigational nature of the study protocol (including forseeable risks and possible side effects)

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior therapy with an EGFR inhibitor and/or ARQ 197 (or other known c-MET inhibitor).
* Receipt of any systemic anti-tumor treatment for NSCLC within 3 weeks prior to randomization.
* Receipt of palliative radiotherapy within 2 weeks or radiotherapy for curative intent of target lesions within 3 weeks prior to randomization. Lesions subjected to radiotherapy within 3 weeks prior to randomization may not be used as target lesions.
* Major surgical procedure within 3 weeks prior to randomization.
* History of cardiac disease:

Congestive heart failure defined as Class II to IV per New York Heart Association classification; active coronary artery disease; previously diagnosed symptomatic bradycardia (subjects with asymptomatic bradycardia and heart rate above 50 bpm are allowed) or other cardiac arrhythmia defined as ≥Grade 2 according to NCI CTCAE, version 4.0, or uncontrolled hypertension; myocardial infarction that occurred within 6 months prior to study entry (myocardial infarction that occurred \> 6 months prior to study entry is permitted).

* Clinically unstable central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (to be enrolled in the study, subjects must have confirmation of stable disease by MRI or computed tomography (CT) scan within 4 weeks of randomization and have CNS metastases well controlled by steroids, anti-epileptics or other symptom-relieving medications).
* Need to breastfeed a child during or within 12 weeks of completing the study.
* Significant gastrointestinal disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with absorption of ARQ 197 and/or erlotinib (eg, Crohn's disease, small or large bowel resection, malabsorption syndrome).
* Inability or unwillingness to swallow the complete doses of ARQ 197 or erlotinib.
* Any known contraindication to treatment with, including hypersensitivity to, ARQ 197 or erlotinib.
* History of malignancy other than NSCLC within the 5 years prior to randomization, with the exceptions of adequately treated intraepithelial carcinoma of the cervix uteri; prostate carcinoma with a prostate-specific antigen value \<0.2 ng/mL; or basal or squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV).
* Any other significant co-morbid condition that, in opinion of the investigator, would impair study participation or cooperation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ArQule, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, NJ USA)

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Global Clinical Leader

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Parker, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Thornton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Austell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Cartersville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Douglasville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Fishers, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Goshen, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Greenfield, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Grand Island, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

East Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Goshen, New York, United States

Site Status

Latham, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Tualatin, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Easley, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bartlett, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southaven, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Cedar Park, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Kyle, Texas, United States

Site Status

Round Rock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Round Rock, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Marcos, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Leesburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Midlothian, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Winchester, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Woodbridge, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Yakima, Washington, United States

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Viedma, , Argentina

Site Status

Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Perth, , Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Wollongong, , Australia

Site Status

Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Duffel, , Belgium

Site Status

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Ijuí, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Næstved, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Esslingen am Neckar, , Germany

Site Status

Gauting, , Germany

Site Status

Großhansdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

Leverkusen, , Germany

Site Status

Löwenstein, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Porta Westfalica, , Germany

Site Status

Rheine, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Deszk, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Mátraháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Avellino, , Italy

Site Status

Aviano, , Italy

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Cremona, , Italy

Site Status

Cuneo, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Livorno, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Novara, , Italy

Site Status

Orbassano, , Italy

Site Status

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Rozzano, , Italy

Site Status

Sassari, , Italy

Site Status

Sondalo, , Italy

Site Status

Sora, , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Oaxaca City, , Mexico

Site Status

Oaxaca City, , Mexico

Site Status

Enschede, ER, Netherlands

Site Status

Helmond, HA, Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Bystra, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Prabuty, , Poland

Site Status

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Wałbrzych, , Poland

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Izhevsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Pyatigorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Tula, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Veliky Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Barakaldo, Bilbao, Spain

Site Status

Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Manresa, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Italy Mexico Netherlands Peru Poland Romania Russia Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scagliotti G, von Pawel J, Novello S, Ramlau R, Favaretto A, Barlesi F, Akerley W, Orlov S, Santoro A, Spigel D, Hirsh V, Shepherd FA, Sequist LV, Sandler A, Ross JS, Wang Q, von Roemeling R, Shuster D, Schwartz B. Phase III Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tivantinib (ARQ 197) Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 20;33(24):2667-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.7317. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26169611 (View on PubMed)

Scagliotti GV, Novello S, Schiller JH, Hirsh V, Sequist LV, Soria JC, von Pawel J, Schwartz B, Von Roemeling R, Sandler AB. Rationale and design of MARQUEE: a phase III, randomized, double-blind study of tivantinib plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic, nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2012 Sep;13(5):391-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22440336 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-022365-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ARQ197-A-U302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.