A Study of Onartuzumab (MetMAb) in Combination With Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Participants With Met Diagnostic-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received Chemotherapy For Advanced or Metastatic Disease (MetLung)

NCT ID: NCT01456325

Last Updated: 2016-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

494 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of onartuzumab (MetMAb) in combination with Tarceva (erlotinib) in participants with incurable non-small cell lung cancer identified to be Met diagnostic-positive. Participants will be randomized to receive either onartuzumab (MetMAb) or placebo in combination with erlotinib. Anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Onartuzumab+Erlotinib

Participants will receive onartuzumab 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of every cycle of 3 weeks along with erlotinib 150 mg tablet orally once daily (QD) from Day 1, Cycle 1 until there is evidence of disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erlotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will receive erlotinib 150 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1, Cycle 1.

Onartuzumab (MetMab)

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will receive onartuzumab 15 mg/kg IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle.

Placebo+Erlotinib

Participants will receive onartuzumab matching placebo on Day 1 of every cycle of 3 weeks along with erlotinib 150 mg tablet orally QD from Day 1, Cycle 1 until there is evidence of disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Erlotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will receive erlotinib 150 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1, Cycle 1.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will receive onartuzumab matching placebo on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erlotinib

Participants will receive erlotinib 150 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1, Cycle 1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Onartuzumab (MetMab)

Participants will receive onartuzumab 15 mg/kg IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Participants will receive onartuzumab matching placebo on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tarceva RO5490258

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult participants, greater than or equal to (\>/=) 18 years of age
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed incurable Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC tumor
* Met diagnostic-positive status tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC)
* Results of endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutation testing
* Radiographic evidence of disease
* Prior treatment with at least one platinum-based line of treatment (for stage IIIb/IV) and no more than one additional line of chemotherapy treatment; the last dose of chemotherapy must have been administered \>/= 21 days prior to Day 1
* availability of tissue sample for diagnostic testing is required

Exclusion Criteria

* More than 30 days of exposure to an investigational or marketed agent that can act by EGFR inhibition, or a known EGFR-related toxicity resulting in dose modifications (EGFR inhibitors including but not limited to gefitinib, erlotinib and cetuximab)
* Brain metastases or spinal cord compression not definitively treated with surgery and/or radiation, or previously treated central nervous system (CNS) metastases or spinal cord compression without evidence of stable disease for \>/= 14 days
* History of another malignancy in the previous 3 years, unless cured by surgery alone and continuously disease free for at least 3 years; participants with prior history of non-invasive cancers are eligible
* Inadequate hematological, biochemical or organ function
* Significant history of cardiac disease
* Serious active infection at time of randomization or other serious underlying medical conditions that would impair the ability of the participant to receive protocol treatment
* Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye
* Clinically significant gastro-intestinal disease, including uncontrolled inflammatory gastro-intestinal diseases
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Positive for human immunodefinciency (HIV) infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Genentech, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ivor Caro, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Genentech, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Hayward, California, United States

Site Status

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Clara, California, United States

Site Status

South San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Vallejo, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Bettendorf, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Farmington, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Quilmes, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Chermside, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Gilly (Charleroi), , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Namur, , Belgium

Site Status

Salvador/BA, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Temuco, , Chile

Site Status

Čakovec, , Croatia

Site Status

Dubrovnik, , Croatia

Site Status

Pula, , Croatia

Site Status

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Großhansdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Pokfulam, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Shatin, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Edelény, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Aviano, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy

Site Status

Genoa, Liguria, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Monza, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Rozzano, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Orbassano, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Ancona, The Marches, Italy

Site Status

Lido di Camaiore, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Perugia, Umbria, Italy

Site Status

Aichi, , Japan

Site Status

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Ehime, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Hyōgo, , Japan

Site Status

Hyōgo, , Japan

Site Status

Kanagawa, , Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Miyagi, , Japan

Site Status

Miyagi, , Japan

Site Status

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Saitama, , Japan

Site Status

Shizuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Yamaguchi, , Japan

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Sandton, , South Africa

Site Status

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Cherkassy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sumy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Grimsby, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India Romania United States Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Croatia France Germany Hong Kong Hungary Ireland Israel Italy Japan Netherlands Peru Poland Russia Serbia South Africa South Korea Spain Taiwan Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Koeppen H, Yu W, Zha J, Pandita A, Penuel E, Rangell L, Raja R, Mohan S, Patel R, Desai R, Fu L, Do A, Parab V, Xia X, Januario T, Louie SG, Filvaroff E, Shames DS, Wistuba I, Lipkind M, Huang J, Lazarov M, Ramakrishnan V, Amler L, Phan SC, Patel P, Peterson A, Yauch RL. Biomarker analyses from a placebo-controlled phase II study evaluating erlotinib+/-onartuzumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: MET expression levels are predictive of patient benefit. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 1;20(17):4488-98. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1836. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24687921 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GO27761

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2011-002224-40

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

OAM4971g

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id