RIBS V (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent)

NCT ID: NCT01239953

Last Updated: 2012-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

190 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Treatment of patients with bare metal stent restenosis remains a challenge. This study will assess which interventional strategy (paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs everolimus-eluting stent) is superior in the treatment of patients suffering from bare metal stent restenosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment of patients with bare metal stent restenosis remains a major clinical and technical challenge. Currently, drug-eluting stents are widely used in the management of these patients. Recently, the value of the paclitaxel-eluting balloon in this clinical setting has been suggested. However, there is only scarce observational data on the value of this new balloon in patients with bare metal stent restenosis.

This prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial will compare two different interventional strategies (namely, paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs everolimus-eluting stent) in the treatment of patients with bare metal stent restenosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

In-Stent Restenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paclitaxel-eluting balloon

Paclitaxel-eluting balloon (SeQuent Please, B. Braun)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Coronary angioplasty using the paclitaxel-eluting balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

Balloon angioplasty

Everolimus-eluting stent

Everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Prime, Abbott Vascular)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Coronary angioplasty using the everolimus-eluting stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stent implantation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Coronary angioplasty using the paclitaxel-eluting balloon

Balloon angioplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Coronary angioplasty using the everolimus-eluting stent

Stent implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

PATIENT:

* Age between 20 and 85 years
* Signed informed consent
* Acceptance of late angiographic control (6-9 months)
* Angina and / or objective evidence of ischemia

LESION:

* In-Stent restenosis (\> 50% visual) any bare metal stent
* Knowledge of prior stent location

Exclusion Criteria

PATIENT:

* Inclusion in another clinical research protocol
* Women of childbearing age
* Severe associated systemic disease (including renal or liver failure)
* Severe depression of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF \<25%)
* Disease that affects life expectancy
* Recent myocardial infarction ( \<7 days)
* Time of implantation of the previous BMS \<1 month
* Severe difficulties expected for late angiographic study

LESION:

* Angiographic failure during implementation of initial stent(residual stenosis\> 50%)
* Image of large thrombus in-stent (\> vessel diameter)
* Tortuosity or Ca + + with very severe difficulties during prior stent deployment
* Vessel diameter \<2 mm (visual estimate)
* Restenosis only "outside" the stent (The edge of the stent is not affected)
* Completely occlusive restenosis (100%, TIMI 0)
* Very diffuse restenosis (\> 30 mm length)
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

B.Braun Surgical SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundación Médica para la Investigación y Desarrollo en el Area Cardiovascular

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fernando Alfonso, MD, PhD

Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid. Cardiovascular Institute. Cardiac Department. Interventional Cardiology Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fernando Alfonso, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña

A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario de Alicante

Alicante, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario de Torrecardenas

Almería, Almeria, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina

Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Son Dureta

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves

Granada, Granada, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Carlos Haya

Málaga, Malaga, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria

Málaga, Malaga, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Provincial de Navarra

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo

Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Central de Asturias

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo

Toledo, Toledo, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet

Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baz JA, Pinar E, Albarran A, Mauri J; Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology. Spanish Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Intervention Registry. 17th official report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology (1990-2007). Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Dec;61(12):1298-314. doi: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)60057-8. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19080969 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cruz A, Garcia J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Escaned J, Hernandez R. Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis. EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5 Suppl D:D70-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19736076 (View on PubMed)

Pinar E, Albarran A, Baz JA, Mauri J. [Update on interventional cardiology]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009 Jan;62 Suppl 1:101-16. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(09)70045-4. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19174054 (View on PubMed)

Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, Abrecht L, Vaina S, Morger C, Kukreja N, Juni P, Sianos G, Hellige G, van Domburg RT, Hess OM, Boersma E, Meier B, Windecker S, Serruys PW. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):667-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60314-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17321312 (View on PubMed)

Hernandez RA, Macaya C, Iniguez A, Alfonso F, Goicolea J, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Zarco P. Midterm outcome of patients with asymptomatic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1402-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90594-d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1593031 (View on PubMed)

Kimura T, Yokoi H, Nakagawa Y, Tamura T, Kaburagi S, Sawada Y, Sato Y, Yokoi H, Hamasaki N, Nosaka H, et al. Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):561-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340903.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8569823 (View on PubMed)

Lopez-Palop R, Pinar E, Lozano I, Saura D, Pico F, Valdes M. Utility of the fractional flow reserve in the evaluation of angiographically moderate in-stent restenosis. Eur Heart J. 2004 Nov;25(22):2040-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15541841 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Goicolea J, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Escaned J, Banuelos C, Fernandez C, Macaya C. Long-term outcome and determinants of event-free survival in patients treated with balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Apr 15;83(8):1268-70, A9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00071-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10215297 (View on PubMed)

Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999 Nov 2;100(18):1872-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.18.1872.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10545431 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Cequier A, Angel J, Marti V, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Mantilla R, Lopez-Minguez JR, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Fernandez C, Macaya C, Seabra-Gomes R; Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association angiographic classification of coronary lesion morphology in patients with in-stent restenosis. Insights from the Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2006 Mar;151(3):681.e1-681.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16504631 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Suarez A, Perez L, Sabate M, Moreno R, Banuelos C. Intravascular ultrasound in patients with challenging in-stent restenosis: importance of precise stent visualization. J Interv Cardiol. 2006 Apr;19(2):153-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00123.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16650244 (View on PubMed)

Mehran R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM, Griffin J, Leon MB. Mechanisms and results of balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Sep 15;78(6):618-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00381-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8831392 (View on PubMed)

Reimers B, Moussa I, Akiyama T, Tucci G, Ferraro M, Martini G, Blengino S, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Long-term clinical follow-up after successful repeat percutaneous intervention for stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Jul;30(1):186-92. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00142-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9207641 (View on PubMed)

Bauters C, Banos JL, Van Belle E, Mc Fadden EP, Lablanche JM, Bertrand ME. Six-month angiographic outcome after successful repeat percutaneous intervention for in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 1998 Feb 3;97(4):318-21. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.4.318.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9468204 (View on PubMed)

Adamian M, Colombo A, Briguori C, Nishida T, Marsico F, Di Mario C, Albiero R, Moussa I, Moses JW. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison with rotational atherectomy, additional stent implantation and balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Sep;38(3):672-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01458-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11527615 (View on PubMed)

Albiero R, Silber S, Di Mario C, Cernigliaro C, Battaglia S, Reimers B, Frasheri A, Klauss V, Auge JM, Rubartelli P, Morice MC, Cremonesi A, Schofer J, Bortone A, Colombo A; RESCUT Investigators. Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis cutting balloon evaluation trial (RESCUT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 17;43(6):943-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.054.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15028348 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F. Should we use the cutting balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Dec 21;44(12):2416; author reply 2417. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.022. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15607412 (View on PubMed)

Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz GS, Waksman R, Abizaid A, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Lansky AJ, Stone GW, Leon MB. Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy: comparative mechanisms and results. Circulation. 2000 May 30;101(21):2484-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.21.2484.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10831522 (View on PubMed)

Strauss BH, Umans VA, van Suylen RJ, de Feyter PJ, Marco J, Robertson GC, Renkin J, Heyndrickx G, Vuzevski VD, Bosman FT, et al. Directional atherectomy for treatment of restenosis within coronary stents: clinical, angiographic and histologic results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Dec;20(7):1465-73. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90438-s.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1360479 (View on PubMed)

Sharma SK, Kini A, Mehran R, Lansky A, Kobayashi Y, Marmur JD. Randomized trial of Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-stent Restenosis (ROSTER). Am Heart J. 2004 Jan;147(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14691413 (View on PubMed)

vom Dahl J, Dietz U, Haager PK, Silber S, Niccoli L, Buettner HJ, Schiele F, Thomas M, Commeau P, Ramsdale DR, Garcia E, Hamm CW, Hoffmann R, Reineke T, Klues HG. Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST). Circulation. 2002 Feb 5;105(5):583-8. doi: 10.1161/hc0502.103347.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11827923 (View on PubMed)

Sabate M, Costa MA, Kozuma K, Kay IP, van der Giessen WJ, Coen VL, Ligthart JM, Serrano P, Levendag PC, Serruys PW. Geographic miss: a cause of treatment failure in radio-oncology applied to intracoronary radiation therapy. Circulation. 2000 May 30;101(21):2467-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.21.2467.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10831519 (View on PubMed)

Waksman R, Ajani AE, White RL, Chan R, Bass B, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM, Torguson R, Deible R, Pinnow E, Lindsay J. Five-year follow-up after intracoronary gamma radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Jan 27;109(3):340-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000109488.62415.01. Epub 2004 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14732756 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Sabate M. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs brachytherapy for restenosis. JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1837-8; author reply 1838. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1837-c. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17047209 (View on PubMed)

Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O'Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1264-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1264. Epub 2006 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16531619 (View on PubMed)

Stone GW, Ellis SG, O'Shaughnessy CD, Martin SL, Satler L, McGarry T, Turco MA, Kereiakes DJ, Kelley L, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS V ISR Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1253-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1253. Epub 2006 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16531618 (View on PubMed)

Moris C, Alfonso F, Lambert JL, Espolita A, Barriales V, Rodriguez V, Barriales R, Cortina A. Stenting for coronary dissection after balloon dilation of in-stent restenosis: stenting a previously stented site. Am Heart J. 1996 Apr;131(4):834-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90298-7. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8721666 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Cequier A, Zueco J, Moris C, Suarez CP, Colman T, Esplugas E, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Fernandez C, Macaya C. Stenting the stent: initial results and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary stenting for patients with in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 1;85(3):327-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00741-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11078301 (View on PubMed)

Mintz GS, Hoffmann R, Mehran R, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Leon MB. In-stent restenosis: the Washington Hospital Center experience. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Apr 9;81(7A):7E-13E. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00190-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9551588 (View on PubMed)

Shiran A, Mintz GS, Waksman R, Mehran R, Abizaid A, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Leon MB. Early lumen loss after treatment of in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1998 Jul 21;98(3):200-3. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.3.200.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9697818 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Garcia P, Fleites H, Pimentel G, Sabate M, Hernandez R, Escaned J, Banuelos C, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Moreno R, Macaya C. Repeat stenting for the prevention of the early lumen loss phenomenon in patients with in-stent restenosis. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound findings of a randomized study. Am Heart J. 2005 Feb;149(2):e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15846250 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Hernandez C, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Escaned J, Banuelos C, Sabate M, Sanmartin M, Fernandez C, Macaya C. Fate of stent-related side branches after coronary intervention in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;36(5):1549-56. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00927-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11079657 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Zueco J, Cequier A, Mantilla R, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Auge JM, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Seabra-Gomes R, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Macaya C; Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 3;42(5):796-805. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00852-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12957423 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Gómez-Recio M, Insa L, Calvo I, Hernández JM, Bullones JA, Hernández R, Escaned J, Macaya C, Gama-Ribeiro V, Leitao-Marques A; Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Implications of the

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Alfonso F, Melgares R, Mainar V, Lezaun R, Vazquez N, Tascon J, Pomar F, Cequier A, Angel J, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Sabate M, Banuelos C, Fernandez C, Garcia JM; Restensois Intra-stent: Ballon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Therapeutic implications of in-stent restenosis located at the stent edge. Insights from the restenosis intra-stent balloon angioplasty versus elective stenting (RIBS) randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2004 Oct;25(20):1829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15474698 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Auge JM, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Hernandez JM, Bullones JA, Calvo I, Esplugas E, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Moreno R, Fernandez C, Hernandez R, Gama-Ribeiro V; RIBS Investigators. Long-term results (three to five years) of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Sep 6;46(5):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.050.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16139121 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Mantilla R, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Moreno R, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C; RIBS-II Investigators. A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6;47(11):2152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.078.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16750678 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Iniguez A, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C; RIBS-II Investigators. Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 11;52(20):1621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18992651 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F. Optimal implantation strategies using drug-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: do we know the answer? Circulation. 2004 Sep 14;110(11):e302. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000141457.02676.FD. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15364823 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Fernandez C, Escaned J, Banuelos C, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Cequier A, Sabate M, Moris C, Zueco J, Seabra-Gomes R; Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stent Implantation (RIBS-I) and Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of a pooled analysis of two randomized studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct 1;72(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21694.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18814274 (View on PubMed)

Kastrati A, Mehilli J, von Beckerath N, Dibra A, Hausleiter J, Pache J, Schuhlen H, Schmitt C, Dirschinger J, Schomig A; ISAR-DESIRE Study Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.165.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15644543 (View on PubMed)

Dibra A, Kastrati A, Alfonso F, Seyfarth M, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Mehilli J, Schomig A. Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 6;49(5):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.049. Epub 2006 Dec 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17276188 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F. Drug-eluting stents and in-stent restenosis. JAMA. 2005 Apr 20;293(15):1855; author reply 1855-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.15.1855-a. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15840854 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez AE, Granada JF, Rodriguez-Alemparte M, Vigo CF, Delgado J, Fernandez-Pereira C, Pocovi A, Rodriguez-Granillo AM, Schulz D, Raizner AE, Palacios I, O'Neill W, Kaluza GL, Stone G; ORAR II Investigators. Oral rapamycin after coronary bare-metal stent implantation to prevent restenosis: the Prospective, Randomized Oral Rapamycin in Argentina (ORAR II) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8):1522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.052. Epub 2006 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16630986 (View on PubMed)

Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17101615 (View on PubMed)

Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, Heuer H, Hengstenberg C, Maikowski C, Werner GS, Antoni D, Kleber FX, Bocksch W, Leschke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Speck U, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2009 Jun 16;119(23):2986-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839282. Epub 2009 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19487593 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F. Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis. Circulation 2010. In press.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Alfonso F, Garcia J, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernando L, Hernandez R, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Macaya C. New stent implantation for recurrences after stenting for in-stent restenosis: implications of a third metal layer in human coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 8;54(11):1036-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.082. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19729123 (View on PubMed)

Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, Farhat N, Mahaffey KW, Cutlip DE, Fitzgerald PJ, Sood P, Su X, Lansky AJ; SPIRIT III Investigators. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1903-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1903.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18430909 (View on PubMed)

Stone GW, for the SPIRIT IV Investigators.. One year clinical results of SPIRIT IV (A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease). Clinical Trials. TCT 2009. San Francisco, USA, Septiembre 2009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Garcia Del Blanco B, Garcia-Touchard A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Masotti M, Zueco J, Melgares R, Mainar V, Moreno R, Dominguez A, Sanchis J, Bethencourt A, Moreu J, Cequier A, Marti V, Otaegui I, Bastante T, Gonzalo N, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Cardenas A, Fernandez C; under the auspices of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the RIBS IV and V Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7):e003479. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003479.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27412868 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Garcia Del Blanco B, Otaegui I, Masotti M, Zueco J, Velaquez M, Sanchis J, Garcia-Touchard A, Lazaro-Garcia R, Moreu J, Bethencourt A, Cuesta J, Rivero F, Cardenas A, Gonzalo N, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Fernandez C; RIBS V Study Investigators. Long-Term Results of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Balloons in Patients With Bare-Metal In-Stent Restenosis: 3-Year Follow-Up of the RIBS V Clinical Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1246-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.037. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27339840 (View on PubMed)

Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cardenas A, Garcia Del Blanco B, Seidelberger B, Iniguez A, Gomez-Recio M, Masotti M, Velazquez MT, Sanchis J, Garcia-Touchard A, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Melgares R, Cequier A, Dominguez A, Mainar V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Moreu J, Marti V, Moreno R, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez C, Macaya C; RIBS V Study Investigators, under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;63(14):1378-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24412457 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RIBS V

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.