Abdominal Compression in Orthostatic Hypotension

NCT ID: NCT01223391

Last Updated: 2014-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess if abdominal binders that use pull strings to adjust compression (non-elastic) are more effective than standard elastic abdominal binders in attenuating neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In 3 protocols, patients will undergo standing maneuvers, measured abdominal compressions, continuous BP monitoring and symptoms, ease-of-use and compliance scoring. In protocol 1, patients will exert abdominal compression to maximal tolerable and comfortable levels and values will be recorded. In protocol 2, patients will perform 3 standing maneuvers following a preceding rest period with and without abdominal compression at 20 mmHg (binders used in random order). In protocol 3, the standing maneuvers will be extended and the investigator will adjust binders to levels of abdominal compression corresponding to what patient gauged as maximal tolerable and comfortable levels. Comparison of outcome measures will establish which binder achieves higher abdominal compression, is easier to adjust, likely will be used in the future, if elastic and adjustable binders are equally effective in attenuating Orthostatic Hypotension and its associated symptoms at comparable pressures and which binder is more effective in recovering standing BP and improving orthostatic symptoms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Autonomic Failure Orthostatic Hypotension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Abdominal binder

Standing with abdominal compression using elastic vs. non-elastic abdominal binders.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abdominal binder

Intervention Type OTHER

External abdominal compression sequentially applied at 20 mmHg for 3 minutes, maximal tolerable level for 1.5 minutes and comfortable level for 2 minutes.

No abdominal binder

Standing without abdominal compression

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

No abdominal binder

Intervention Type OTHER

Standing without abdominal binder for 3 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abdominal binder

External abdominal compression sequentially applied at 20 mmHg for 3 minutes, maximal tolerable level for 1.5 minutes and comfortable level for 2 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

No abdominal binder

Standing without abdominal binder for 3 minutes

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Elastic abdominal binder Non-elastic abdominal binder

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and nonpregnant women aged 18-80 years.
2. Chronic neurologic conditions known to cause OH: multiple system atrophy (MSA), Parkinson's disease, autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy or progressive autonomic neuropathy (e.g., diabetic, amyloid).
3. Orthostatic hypotension defined as a drop of systolic BP\>30 mmHg or diastolic BP\>15 mmHg.
4. Adrenergic failure of at least moderate severity defined as CASS-adrenergic ≥3.
5. Ambulatory and able to stand more than 3 minutes without pre-syncope.
6. BMI \<29.
7. Ability to comply with study procedures and appointments.
8. Normal cognition (able to understand the study, learn the maneuvers, and follow complex commands).
9. Concomitant therapy with anticholinergic, alpha and beta agonists will be withdrawn 48 hours prior to autonomic evaluations. Midodrine will be withdrawn the night before evaluation. Fludrocortisone doses up to 0.2 mg per day will be permitted.

The diagnosis of probable MSA requires 1) the presence of orthostatic hypotension or urinary incontinence, and 2) poorly levodopa responsive parkinsonism or cerebellar ataxia.

The diagnosis of clinically definite Parkinson's disease requires 1) the presence of resting tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity, 2) clinical asymmetry, and 3) response to levodopa.

The diagnosis of autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy requires 1) a sub-cute onset, 2) the presence of generalized and severe autonomic failure (CASS\>6), 3) selective involvement of autonomic nerve fibers and 4) positive alpha-3 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor auto-antibodies.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating females.
2. Non-neurogenic OH, such as that due to medication or hypovolemia.
3. Chronic illnesses or other central nervous system conditions that affect autonomic function.
4. Established dementia.
5. Debilitating ataxia.
6. Moderate to severe lower extremity weakness.
7. Severe systemic illness, such as end-stage pulmonary, cardiac or renal disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mayo Clinic

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey Basford, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-005203

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.