Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Study on Breast Volume and Shape Change
NCT ID: NCT01222390
Last Updated: 2023-04-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-11-30
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Externally Implantable Tissue Expansion Device on Scar Length
NCT00798798
Abdominal Scar Improvement in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
NCT05377723
A Study of Granexin® Gel for the Reduction of Scar Formation in Surgical Wounds Following Bilateral Anchor Incision Breast Surgery
NCT04331080
Force Modulating Tissue Bridges for Closure of Vertical Scars in Breast Reduction
NCT05028816
Silicone Taping for the Improvement of Abdominal Donor Site Scars
NCT04506255
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The crescent-shaped expander has been studied by John YS Kim, MD in a retrospective review of 40 consecutive patients who underwent acellular dermis assisted breast reconstruction. He found the crescentric tissue expansion with acellular dermis is well tolerated with high patient and surgeon satisfaction likely due to selective lower pole expansion related to the crescent shape, as well as significant immediate expansion related to larger subpectoral pockets.
To date, no studies have been reported that investigate the lower pole expansion resulting from varying tissue expander dimensions with objective computer software\[15, 16\]. The advent of three-dimensional imaging technology to objectively measure lower pole expansion provides a quantitative means to study the advantages of using the CPX3® tissue expander. We propose a study that will show whether or not the CPX3® tissue expander's unique design can have an ultimate effect on the shape and location of volume change on the postoperative breast. Three-dimensional cameras also provide an advantage for assessing patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction who desire a reconstructive outcome that will bear some resemblance to their current breasts \[15\].
The 3-D imaging calculation evaluates the following parameters: absolute volume, absolute volume change, location of expansion, base width, breast projection and contour symmetry. Older methods of volume assessment would assume that the base of the breast is a flat plane. The Vectra system takes into account the curvature of the chest wall, which results in a more accurate breast volume measurement. With 3-D imaging there is no exposure to radiation\[16\]. Another advantage to 3-D imaging is the option to view the subject's image at any angle, 360 degrees\[17\]. Our study would show the postoperative results of using the CPX3® tissue expander with an objective analysis of the degree of lower-pole expansion.
This will be a prospective study. Fifteen patients will be enrolled and will receive a Contour profile tissue expander (CPX3) during their reconstruction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Contour Profile Tissue Exander
Patients undergoing breast reconstruction using a Contour Profile Tissue Expander (CPX3).
Contour Profile Tissue Expander
The Contour Profile Tissue Expander is a tissue expander with a greater height to width ratio than traditional tissue expanders. This increased ratio allows for greater lower pole expansion, thus creating a more natural looking, ptotic breast. Additionally, the suture tabs on the back of the expander hold the expander in place and prevent malposition and displacement.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Contour Profile Tissue Expander
The Contour Profile Tissue Expander is a tissue expander with a greater height to width ratio than traditional tissue expanders. This increased ratio allows for greater lower pole expansion, thus creating a more natural looking, ptotic breast. Additionally, the suture tabs on the back of the expander hold the expander in place and prevent malposition and displacement.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have had delayed secondary flap surgery (replacing expander with autogenous tissue)
* Patients who have pacemakers and/or defibrillators which are not compatible with CPX3
25 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mentor Worldwide, LLC
INDUSTRY
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Kim
Associate Professor Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John YS Kim, MD, MA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Dumanian GA, Kim JYS, Mustoe TA, Galiano RD, Fine NA. Outcomes of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in the setting of prereconstruction radiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):354-361. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823ae8b1.
Mioton LM, Smetona JT, Hanwright PJ, Seth AK, Wang E, Bilimoria KY, Gaido J, Fine NA, Kim JY. Comparing thirty-day outcomes in prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 13,082 patients? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jul;66(7):917-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
Nahabedian MY, Galdino G. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1582-90. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000085818.54980.C4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
G10-0056
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.