Laryngeal Reflex Study Under Propofol Anesthesia: Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine
NCT ID: NCT01222169
Last Updated: 2015-10-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypotheses:
I: The severity of laryngospasm evoked by laryngeal stimulation is reduced 2 min. after iv. administration on 2mg/kg lidocaine in pediatric patients anesthetized with propofol (3mcg/ml).
II:The incidence of laryngospasm elicited by controlled stimulation 10min. after iv. administration of lidocaine is equivalent to the response before the administration of lidocaine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interest of Lidocaine in Children with Upper Airway Infection Undergoing General Anesthesia
NCT06584461
Evaluation of Topic Anaesthesia for Laryngoscopy With Fibroscopy During Paediatric Ear Nose Throat (ENT)Consultation
NCT01125332
Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant on Sore Throat and Hemodynamics
NCT03031808
Usefulness of Lidocaine as Topical Pharyngeal Anaesthesia in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Under Sedation With Propofol
NCT01489891
Efficacy of IV Lidocaine at Alleviating Pain Associated With Propofol Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sedation
NCT00786916
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In a previous work using a established stimulation model (stimulating the laryngeal mucosa with a small amount of distilled water under direct fiberbronchoscopic observation), we observed a risk reduction of 60% of laryngospasm 2min. after the application of 2mg/kg bolus of lidocaine. This effect had already diminished after 10 min.
The laryngeal reflex responses differ largely in children anesthetized with either inhalational anesthetics or with propofol. The impact iv administered lidocaine on laryngeal and respiratory reflex responses in children anesthetized with propofol has not been assessed, although this combination might result in a profound suppression of laryngeal reflex responses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
larynx assessment under stimulation
NaCl 0,9%
Propofol 3micrgr/ml (TCI plasma concentration) and NaCl 0,9% 2min. and 10min. application
Larynx assessment under stimulation
NaCl 0,9%
Propofol 3micrgr/ml (TCI plasma concentration) and NaCl 0,9% 2min. and 10min. application
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NaCl 0,9%
Propofol 3micrgr/ml (TCI plasma concentration) and NaCl 0,9% 2min. and 10min. application
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* gender: female / male
* elective surgery or diagnostic procedure requiring general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* reactive airway disease under therapy
* cardiovascular disease
* neuromuscular disease
* positive family history of malignant hyperthermia
* known hypersensitivity to the investigational medical product
* Participation in another study
* Inability of the parents to read and understand the participant's information
25 Months
84 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thomas Erb
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thomas Erb
Prof. Dr. Thomas O. Erb
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas O Erb, Professor MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University children's hospital beider Basel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University children's hospital beider Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UKBB_ANA_LR 6
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.