Cutting Balloon Study

NCT ID: NCT01205568

Last Updated: 2018-05-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

73 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-08-01

Study Completion Date

2009-09-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter Cutting Balloon therapy for branch pulmonary artery stenosis resistant to low pressure dilation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed study will be a prospective, multi-center, randomized, blinded trial comparing 2 treatments for pulmonary artery stenosis. Specifically, vessels that fail to respond to balloon inflation at 8 ATM will be individually randomized to 1 of 2 treatment pathways. In the first treatment pathway, the vessel is dilated using a CB, followed by additional low pressure balloon dilation (\< 8ATM). In the second pathway,the vessel is dilated with high pressure balloon angioplasty, with balloon inflation pressures exceeding 15 ATM. Cross-over therapy will be permitted for failed high pressure treatment starting with enrollment of patient #15. The primary outcome assessment for efficacy will be a comparison of percent change in minimum lumen diameter before and after randomized therapy, as determined by a core laboratory blinded to pathway assignment. The primary outcome assessment for safety will be a comparison of the proportion of vessel dilations resulting in any serious adverse events, as determined by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Patient-level safety endpoints will also be tabulated. Patients can have multiple vessels enrolled; analytical techniques will adjust for potential intra-patient correlation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Artery Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with Resistant Pulmonary Artery Stenosis

Vessels with resistant PA stenosis were identified during catheterization and eligible vessels were randomized to Cutting Balloon or High Pressure Balloon Dilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcatheter Cutting Balloon therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

High Pressure Balloon Angioplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcatheter Cutting Balloon therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

High Pressure Balloon Angioplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

a. At least 1 branch pulmonary artery stenosis referred for planned catheterization for PA dilation b. At least one of the following: i.greater than one half systemic right ventricular pressure ii. regional decrease in pulmonary blood flow by lung scan iii. elevated pulmonary artery pressures (\> 20 mmHg MPAP) iv. cyanosis at least in part due to PA stenosis c. Informed consent of patient and/or parent/guardian; assent of mature minors d. Agreement to participate in protocol, including follow-up testing


1. Native pulmonary artery or branch which fails balloon dilation up to 8 ATM; as defined by failure to eliminate a waist
2. Native pulmonary artery or branch with a balloon waist diameter less than 7.5 mm (i.e.,0.5 mm less than the largest available CB) with dilation at 8 ATM
3. All eligible vessels that are dilated during the catheterization must be enrolled as study vessels; "off-study" use of Cutting Balloons or high pressure dilations in eligible vessels is not allowed.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior pulmonary artery angioplasty or surgery on the vessel within the previous 6 weeks
2. Pregnancy


1. Vessel with an aneurysm from a prior dilation or surgery, defined as a local enlargement of the vessel greater than 100% of the lumen diameter both proximally and distally to the aneurysm. The maximum aneurysm diameter and vessel lumen diameter proximal and distal to the aneurysm will be recorded. The location of the aneurysm relative to the angioplasty site will be determined and reported as proximal, distal, or in the region of waist formation.
2. Prior stent placement associated with the obstruction

i. balloon inflation for the purpose of expanding the diameter of the stent along its length with no residual waist proximal or distal to the stent edges ii. balloon inflation resulting in waist formation within the edges of a stent iii. dilation of a vessel through the cells of a stent c. Unifocalized nor non-unifocalized systemic to pulmonary artery collaterals. d. A vessel requiring therapy at a site not amenable to delivery or safe positioning of a Cutting Balloon device due to unfavorable anatomy as determined by the physician and based on as assessment of vessel angles, size, length, and proximity to other vessels.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kathy Jenkins

Professor of Pediatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kathy Jenkins, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Boston Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California at San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital, Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

75593

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

0502027R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Drug Coated Balloons for Prevention of Restenosis
NCT00696956 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
BPA vs. PEA in CTEPH
NCT05110066 RECRUITING NA