Beta Blockers and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease Aortopathy (BAV Study)

NCT ID: NCT01202721

Last Updated: 2019-09-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

85 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether long-term treatment with a beta-blocker (BB) such as atenolol and/or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) such as telmisartan, given to adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease (aortopathy) reduces the widening (dilatation) of the aorta from its baseline size.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease lesion with an estimated 280 000 to 560 000 people affected in the Canada. Dilatation of the ascending aorta is a common feature in patients with BAV and is a result of inherent vascular abnormalities with superimposed effects of age and acquired cardiovascular risk factors. Severe aortic dilatation (\> 50mm) leads to aortic dissection and premature death.

Histopathological studies of the aortas in patients with BAVs report similar findings to that of patients with Marfan syndrome. Beta Blocker (BB) therapy and more recently, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) therapy, have been shown to decrease to rate of aortic dilatation and be of benefit to patients with Marfan syndrome. There is no such data however in patients with BAV and aortopathy.

Within the context of a randomized clinical trial, the investigators proposed to test the hypothesis that BB or ARB will reduce the rate of progressive aortic dilatation in adults with BAVs and ascending aortopathy as compared to placebo.

Design: Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial of adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy. Patients who are eligible to take either study medication will be randomly allocated to participate in either the BB (atenolol) vs. placebo arm, or the ARB (telmisartan) vs. placebo arm. Patients who are ineligible for the BB arm will be assigned to the ARB vs. placebo arm and patients who are ineligible for the ARB arm will be assigned to the BB vs. placebo arm. Within each arm, all participants will be randomized to take either placebo or active medication. The atenolol arm will be up-titrated to100mg/day and the telmisartan arm will be up-titrated to 80 mg/day, or to the maximum tolerated dose.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Atenolol

Atenolol or matching placebo 25 mg up-titrated to 100 mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Atenolol

Intervention Type DRUG

Atenolol or matching placebo 25 mg up-titrated to 100 mg

Telmisartan

Telmisartan or matching placebo 40 mg up-titrated to 80mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Telmisartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Telmisartan or matching placebo 40 mg up-titrated to 80mg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Atenolol

Atenolol or matching placebo 25 mg up-titrated to 100 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Telmisartan

Telmisartan or matching placebo 40 mg up-titrated to 80mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Atenolol 25/50/100 mg or matched placebo Micardis 40/80 mg or matched placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age =\> 18 years
* Men and women with BAV and ascending aorta measuring \> 37mm.
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of cardiac diseases, such as

* Symptomatic aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation referred for surgical intervention or asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation based on current guidelines
* Uncontrolled heart failure, right ventricular failure due to pulmonary hypertension
* Cardiogenic shock
2. Systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg
4. Ascending aorta measuring ≥ 50mm, requiring prophylactic ascending aorta surgery
5. Unable to provide informed consent
7. Prior surgery on ascending aorta or aortic root (balloon valvuloplasty, aortic valvotomy or post coarctation surgery are acceptable)
8. Women who are pregnant at screening visit
9. Contraindication to MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, metallic clip in eye or brain)
10. History of any illness which limits the participants' ability to complete the study


1. Heart rate \<60 bpm
2. Heart block (1st, 2nd and 3rd degree AV block on ECG), or sick sinus syndrome
3. Asthma of sufficient severity to represent a contraindication to BB use in the judgment of the patient's physician
4. History of severe peripheral artery disorders
5. History of pheochromocytoma without the use of alpha-adrenergic blockers
6. History of metabolic acidosis


1. Women who are pregnant, lactating or who intend to become pregnant during the course of the study
2. Women who are of childbearing age and are not on reliable, accepted form of birth control
3. Hyperkalemia \[serum potassium \> 5.5 mmol/L\] or renal dysfunction \[GFR\<45% measured by MDRD)
5. History of bilateral renal artery stenosis or unilateral renal artery stenosis to a solitary kidney
6. History of hepatic insufficiency and hepato-biliary obstruction
7. History of fructose intolerance
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Population Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Judith Therrien, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MdGill University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

University of British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. Boniface Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health Sciences-General

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Population Health Research Institute - Coordinating Centre

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital/University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Cité de la Santé de Laval

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Regina General Hospital

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BAV-15JUNE2010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.