An Active-controlled, Clinical Trial to Assess Central Hemodynamic Effects of Bisoprolol in Hypertensive Patients (Central Hemodynamic Assessment Measured in Patient With HypertensION [CHAMPION])

NCT ID: NCT01079962

Last Updated: 2014-02-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

209 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-12-31

Study Completion Date

2011-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Antihypertensive drugs aim to reduce blood pressure (BP) either through decrease of the total peripheral resistance through vasodilatation at the level of arterioles (microcirculation) or by decreasing the cardiac output through reduction of the stroke volume or heart rate or both. On the other hand, all antihypertensive drugs might potentially decrease arterial stiffness passively with the reduction of the distending pressure or with the resynchronization of the reflected pressure wave. With theses potential mechanisms, it is also expected that these drugs might exert a favorable effect on pulse pressure amplification between central and peripheral arteries.

However, there is solid evidence that the widely applied antihypertensive drugs have differential effect on brachial and central BP. Several reports in the past have confirmed the potential hypothesis that beta blockers decrease central BP less than the observed reduction at the level of the brachial artery. It has been hypothesized that deceleration of heart rate and the re synchronizing the reflected pressure wave earlier in the systolic phase seems to be the leading cause of non-favorable effect of beta blockers on central BP, these effects might be partially counterbalanced in beta blockers with high beta-1 selectivity resulting in less peripheral vasoconstriction properties.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Central pulse pressure is a better predictor of left ventricular mass and carotid intima thickness, and the conventional peripheral BP does not seem to be an accurate reflection of central arterial BP. The pulse pressure amplification between peripheral and central arteries reflects the left ventricular afterload, subendothelial viability, and the intensity of cyclic stress imposed to the renal and cerebral micro- and macro vessels. As central hemodynamic parameters are independently associated with organ damage and are closely related to important cardiovascular outcome, it is suggested that the new clinical trials on antihypertensive drug treatment should compare simultaneously the chronic effect of drugs on both peripheral and central BP.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective:

* To assess the effect of bisoprolol versus atenolol on the aortic pulse pressure as a central hemodynamic index in subjects with hypertension

Secondary objectives:

* To assess the effect of bisoprolol versus atenolol on the aortic BP as a central hemodynamic index in subjects with hypertension
* To assess the effect of bisoprolol versus atenolol on the AIx and cfPWV as arterial stiffness indexes in subjects with hypertension
* To assess the effect of bisoprolol versus atenolol on the aortic pulse pressure as a central hemodynamic index at interim visit (Visit 4)
* To assess the effect of bisoprolol versus atenolol on the lipid profile and serum glucose as metabolism indexes
* To assess the effect of bisoprolol versus atenolol on the brachial BP as a peripheral BP index in subjects with hypertension
* To assess the safety and tolerability of bisoprolol versus atenolol in subjects with hypertension

The present study will be approximately of 14 weeks duration comprising of 1 week screening, followed by a 12 weeks treatment period and a 2 weeks post study follow up contact conducted via telephone to monitor additional serious adverse experiences.

There will be 4 scheduled visits (at Day -7, Day 0, Week 4 and Week 12). After screening period in which eligibility criteria were confirmed, subjects with hypertension will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment with either bisoprolol or atenolol. Hemodynamic measurements will be made at baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and biochemical measurements will be made at baseline (Day 0) and at Week 12.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bisoprolol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bisoprolol

Intervention Type DRUG

Bisoprolol tablet will be administered orally at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) once daily in the morning for 12 weeks.

Atenolol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Atenolol

Intervention Type DRUG

Atenolol tablet will be administered orally at a dose of 50 mg once daily in the morning for 12 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bisoprolol

Bisoprolol tablet will be administered orally at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) once daily in the morning for 12 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Atenolol

Atenolol tablet will be administered orally at a dose of 50 mg once daily in the morning for 12 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CONCORĀ® TENORMINĀ®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* An antihypertensive-naive subject or a subject who has not been taking the previously administered antihypertensive agent for at least 4 weeks prior to screening
* Subjects aged between 20 and 75 years, inclusive
* Subjects with systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than or equal to 140 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and less than 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 90 mmHg and less than 110 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with secondary hypertension
* Subjects with renal impairment (Creatinine greater than 150 micromoles/liter \[mcmol/L\] or Creatinine greater than 1.7 mg/deciliter \[dL\])
* Subjects with severe hypertension (Stage III) SBP greater than or equal to 180 mmHg or DBP greater than or equal to 110 mmHg
* Subjects with congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina
* Subjects with moderate bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* Subjects with symptomatic bradycardia, radial artery injury, second degree or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, left bundle branch block (LBBB)
* Subjects with a history of hypersensitivity to bisoprolol and atenolol products
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Responsible

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Merck Ltd., Korea, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Severance Hosptial, 250, Seongsanno, Seodaemungu

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Park S, Rhee MY, Lee SY, Park SW, Jeon D, Kim BW, Kwan J, Choi D. A prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, clinical trial to assess central haemodynamic effects of bisoprolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2013 Apr;31(4):813-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835e8f5b.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23385648 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EMD 084000-505

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fixed-Free HTN Trial
NCT03578042 UNKNOWN PHASE4