Cost-effectiveness of PCI With Taxus vs CABG - 5 Years FUP

NCT ID: NCT01199419

Last Updated: 2014-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

207 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the present study is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using TAXUS stents compared to the costs of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in the first 5 years and then 10 years after intervention. Multivessel PCI or CABG was performed in 114 or 93 patients, respectively. Clinical outcomes, in terms of incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), all-cause death, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke, resource use and costs are analyzed prospectively over a 5 and 10-year follow-up (FUP) period. Overall costs consist of the baseline costs of the index procedure (PCI or CABG), clinical and angiographic procedure-related treatments during the entire FUP. The primary endpoint is cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness, defined as the reduction of the composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PCI

comparison of PCI vs. CABG in multivessel disease

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

invasive treatment of coronary artery disease

CABG

comparison of PCI vs. CABG in multivessel disease

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

invasive treatment of coronary artery disease

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

comparison of PCI vs. CABG in multivessel disease

invasive treatment of coronary artery disease

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* two or three-vessel disease requiring percutaneous or surgical multivessel intervention with the aim of complete revascularization
* age \> 18 years
* clinical symptoms (stable or unstable angina) or signs of myocardial ischemia
* ≥ 50% diameter stenosis of each lesion

Exclusion Criteria

* acute myocardial infarction (\< 48 h);
* contraindications to clopidogrel, aspirin, heparin and taxol;
* pregnancy or lack of protection against pregnancy or breast-feeding during the study;
* hemorrhagic diathesis and platelet count \<100.000/ml3
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mariann Gyongyosi

MD PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of Vienna, Dept. of Cardiology

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Version 1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Plug Arterial Closure System (PACS, 7F)
NCT00533156 COMPLETED PHASE2