The Vitality, Independence, and Vigor in Elders Study I Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT01198886

Last Updated: 2015-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

121 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate changes in functional status that result from an Exercise-Nutrition Program (ENP) targeted toward older adults residing at senior housing facilities.

\- The primary hypothesis is that over the 6-month intervention period subjects in the intervention group will realize significant improvements in lower extremity function compared to a control group.

Secondary objectives

To evaluate changes in nutritional status that result from the ENP.

\- The secondary hypothesis is that subjects in the intervention group will realize significant increases in circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) and demonstrate improvements in nutritional status compared to a control group.

To evaluate changes in inflammatory status that result from the ENP.

\- Subjects in the ENP group will exhibit reduced concentrations of circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6) compared with the control group.

To evaluate changes in psychosocial factors that result from the ENP

* The related hypothesis is that over the 6-month intervention period subjects in the intervention group will increase exercise self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation to exercise, and satisfaction of psychological needs compared to a control group.
* Additionally it is hypothesized that subjects in the intervention group will realize improvements in mood and quality of life compared to a control group.

To assess the feasibility of conducting the Exercise-Nutrition Program in a senior housing facility setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Older adults are the fastest growing segment of the population in many countries around the world, and the maintenance of independence has emerged as a major public health priority. Although a significant decline in physical function was once considered an inevitable consequence of aging, many studies have demonstrated that targeted exercise programs can dramatically improve physical function, even into advanced age. There is also evidence that appropriately timed protein intake is important for exercise recovery and the growth and maintenance of lean body mass. Other nutrients may be important to muscle strength and function as well. Yet many older adults have poor nutritional status. A combined exercise and nutrition program for functionally at-risk older adults, conveniently offered in the senior housing facilities where many reside, has great potential to improve functional status and quality of life in this population.

Main objective

* The primary objective of this study is to evaluate changes in functional status that result from the Exercise-Nutrition Program (ENP).
* The primary hypothesis is that over the 6-month intervention period subjects in the intervention group will realize significant improvements in lower extremity function compared to a control group.

Secondary objectives

The secondary objectives of the research project are:

* To evaluate changes in nutritional status that result from the ENP.
* The secondary hypothesis is that subjects in the intervention group will realize significant increases in circulating IGF-1 and 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) and demonstrate improvements in nutritional status compared to the control group.
* Subjects in the ENP will exhibit reductions in circulating plasma IL-6 concentrations, which are indicative of systemic inflammatory status.
* To evaluate changes in psychosocial factors that result from the ENP.
* The related hypothesis is that over the 6-month intervention period subjects in the intervention group will increase exercise self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation to exercise, and satisfaction of psychological needs compared to a control group.
* Additionally it is hypothesized that subjects in the intervention group will realize improvements in mood and quality of life compared to a control group.

Another major objective is to assess the feasibility of conducting the Exercise-Nutrition Program in a senior housing center facility setting.

TRIAL DESIGN

Type of trial The study objectives will be achieved in the context of a controlled, randomized field trial. Randomization will be by site (senior housing center). Intervention group subjects will participate in the Exercise-Nutrition Program (ENP). Control group subjects will participate in the Successful Aging Program (SAP), which will provide them with useful skills and an adequate attention control, but will not affect the primary outcome of this study.

Subjects, groups and centers:

In each study group the number of subjects to complete the study protocol will be 40 (see also 9.3 statistical section). Assuming a conservative dropout rate of 10% after the 3 month intervention and 15% at the end of the 6 month study, a sample of 53 subjects per group, or 106 total, will be required to be enrolled in the study. 16-20- senior housing centers will be recruited and each will run one class with an average size of at least 5 subjects (maximum 25 subjects).

Sites will be assigned to one of 2 groups:

Group 1: Exercise-Nutrition Program (ENP) Group 2: Successful Aging Program (SAP)

Duration of subject participation:

Subjects will undergo the proposed intervention for 6 months. The target population for this study will be elderly people (65 yrs+) living in senior housing centers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Functionally Limited Sedentary

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Successful Aging Program

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Successful Aging Program

Intervention Type OTHER

Once per week discussion on lifestyle topics important to older adults. Classes conclude with a gentle upper body stretching routine.

Exercise-Nutrition Program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise-Nutrition Program

Intervention Type OTHER

Targeted exercise program offered 3-days per week at the study participants place of residence (senior housing facility). Other means to encourage physical activity outside of these exercise classes will be available. A nutrient-rich protein carbohydrate experimental beverage will be taken following the exercise sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Successful Aging Program

Once per week discussion on lifestyle topics important to older adults. Classes conclude with a gentle upper body stretching routine.

Intervention Type OTHER

Exercise-Nutrition Program

Targeted exercise program offered 3-days per week at the study participants place of residence (senior housing facility). Other means to encourage physical activity outside of these exercise classes will be available. A nutrient-rich protein carbohydrate experimental beverage will be taken following the exercise sessions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 65+
* Living at a senior housing facility
* SPPB score of 3-9
* BMI \<35
* 6CIT \< or = 14
* Permission of primary care provider
* Willingness to be randomized to either treatment group

Exclusion Criteria

* Failure to provide informed consent
* Participate in \>125 minutes per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity
* Moderate to severe cognitive impairment (6CIT \>15)
* Inability to communicate due to severe, uncorrectable hearing loss or speech disorder
* Severe visual impairment (if it precludes completion of assessments and/or intervention)
* Wheelchair bound
* Late-stage, progressive, degenerative neurologic disease, e.g., Parkinson's Disease, multiple sclerosis, acute lateral sclerosis.
* Severe rheumatologic or orthopedic diseases, e.g., awaiting joint replacement, active inflammatory disease
* Terminal illness with life expectancy less than 12 months, as determined by a physician
* Severe pulmonary disease, requiring either steroid pills or injections or the use of supplemental oxygen
* Severe cardiac disease, including NYHA Class III or IV congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, history of cardiac arrest, use of a cardiac defibrillator, or uncontrolled angina
* Other significant co-morbid disease that would impair ability to participate in the exercise-based intervention, e.g. renal failure on hemodialysis, severe psychiatric disorder (e.g. bipolar, schizophrenia), excessive alcohol use (\>14 drinks per wk); persons with depression will not be excluded
* Surgery in the previous 6 months
* Patient who cannot be expected to comply with treatment
* Inability to obtain signed authorization from participant's primary care health care provider.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tufts University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Miriam E Nelson, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tufts University

Sara C. Folta, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tufts University

Roger F. Fielding, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tufts University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Drake Village

Arlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Nashoba Park

Ayer, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Compass on the Bay

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Chestnut Park at Cleveland Circle

Brighton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Neville Place at Fresh Pond

Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Youville House

Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Chelmsford Crossings

Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Putnam Farms at Danvers

Danvers, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Standish Village at Lower Mills

Dorchester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Youville Place

Lexington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Methuen Village

Methuen, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Evans Park at Newton Center

Newton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Coleman House

Newton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

The Falls at Cordingly Dam

Newton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Golda Meir House

Newton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Holland Street Center

Somerville, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Waltham Crossings

Waltham, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Corcoran MP, Chui KK, White DK, Reid KF, Kirn D, Nelson ME, Sacheck JM, Folta SC, Fielding RA. Accelerometer Assessment of Physical Activity and Its Association with Physical Function in Older Adults Residing at Assisted Care Facilities. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(7):752-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0640-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27499309 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09.37.CLI

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1006010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stress Resilience Study
NCT00891488 COMPLETED