Diagnostic of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

NCT ID: NCT01193426

Last Updated: 2018-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

316 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), an infection of ascitic fluid in the absence of localized intra-abdominal infection, is one of the main potentially fatal complications of cirrhosis. In the case of SBP, early diagnosis and rapid therapeutic care can improve patient survival (Garcia-Tsao, 2001).

The diagnosis of SBP is based on the detection of a polymorphonuclear neutrophils count equal to or greater than 250 /mm3 in the ascitic fluid (method of reference). However, obtaining an ascitic cell count is sometimes difficult because it can not always be performed in emergency especially outside the opening hours of the laboratory of Bacteriology. This raises the necessity of developing quick and easy alternative approaches of diagnosis.

Few groups have proposed the use of urinary reagent strip for rapid diagnosis of SBP. Nevertheless, the investigators clinical teams have shown that the sensitivity of this test was low in a large national multicenter prospective study involving more than a thousand patients (Nousbaum et al., 2007). The use of Multistix strips test is thus not recommended for the routine application of diagnosis of SBP due to its lack of sensitivity.

Although performed on small groups of patients, several studies have reported that IL-8 or IL-6 might be used as markers of ascitic fluid infections. Based on these data and confirmed by the investigators preliminary results the investigators propose to study on a broad recruitment of patients estimated to about 500 inclusions (about 45 infected patients) the interest of using IL-8 and IL-6 as predictive markers of SBP. The investigators propose to use an ELISA method, standardized, rapid and automated, applicable in the context of emergency (7 days a week and 24 hours a day) as previously described in the work conducted to exclude the urinary tract infection (Oregioni et al., 2005).

During the preliminary experiments conducted for this project, the investigators also found systematic variation of another marker, leptin. This is a protein hormone involved in the inflammatory and immune responses (Otero et al., 2005). It appears necessary to include the study of this marker in the analysis of differential protein response between patients suffering or not suffering from SBP.

The investigators therefore propose a diagnostic study, non-interventional, prospective, multicenter trial conducted over 2 years.

* The main objective is to establish the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative) of IL-8 and IL-6, assayed in the ascites fluid by an automated ELISA in the early diagnosis of SBP.
* The secondary objectives are to confirm the interest of the measurement of leptin in the SBP and to establish the diagnostic performance of IL-8 and IL-6 or leptin according to different clinical features in patients (score Child-Pugh classification and history of SBP, ascitic fluid infection with positive bacterial culture).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cirrhosis patient

All consecutive patients with cirrhosis admitted to the five participating center Patients were hospitalized or treated in an ambulatory setting for treatment of ascites or complications of cirrhosis. Ascitic fluid was obtained by paracentesis according to the usual clinical management for these patients.

Ascite liquid puncture

Intervention Type OTHER

Ascitic fluid obtained by paracentesis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ascite liquid puncture

Ascitic fluid obtained by paracentesis

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years old
* Patient with social insurance
* Signature of informed consent
* Patient admitted for treatment of ascites or complications of cirrhosis. Diagnosis of cirrhosis relied on clinical, biological and morphological criteria (portal hypertention, hepatic biopsy…).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient who have received abdominal surgery within the last month.
* Patient with chylous ascites or ascites not related to portal hypertention (pancreatic ascites, hemoperitoneum, ascites observed during acute heart failure, peritoneal tuberculosis, hepatocellular carcinome…)
* Patient with obesity severe (IMC ≥ à 35 kg/m2)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

LANDRAUD Luce, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hepato-gastro-enterology and bacteriology department

Brest, , France

Site Status

Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department

Creil, , France

Site Status

Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department

Hyères, , France

Site Status

Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department

Nice, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-API-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.