Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
316 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-09-30
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The diagnosis of SBP is based on the detection of a polymorphonuclear neutrophils count equal to or greater than 250 /mm3 in the ascitic fluid (method of reference). However, obtaining an ascitic cell count is sometimes difficult because it can not always be performed in emergency especially outside the opening hours of the laboratory of Bacteriology. This raises the necessity of developing quick and easy alternative approaches of diagnosis.
Few groups have proposed the use of urinary reagent strip for rapid diagnosis of SBP. Nevertheless, the investigators clinical teams have shown that the sensitivity of this test was low in a large national multicenter prospective study involving more than a thousand patients (Nousbaum et al., 2007). The use of Multistix strips test is thus not recommended for the routine application of diagnosis of SBP due to its lack of sensitivity.
Although performed on small groups of patients, several studies have reported that IL-8 or IL-6 might be used as markers of ascitic fluid infections. Based on these data and confirmed by the investigators preliminary results the investigators propose to study on a broad recruitment of patients estimated to about 500 inclusions (about 45 infected patients) the interest of using IL-8 and IL-6 as predictive markers of SBP. The investigators propose to use an ELISA method, standardized, rapid and automated, applicable in the context of emergency (7 days a week and 24 hours a day) as previously described in the work conducted to exclude the urinary tract infection (Oregioni et al., 2005).
During the preliminary experiments conducted for this project, the investigators also found systematic variation of another marker, leptin. This is a protein hormone involved in the inflammatory and immune responses (Otero et al., 2005). It appears necessary to include the study of this marker in the analysis of differential protein response between patients suffering or not suffering from SBP.
The investigators therefore propose a diagnostic study, non-interventional, prospective, multicenter trial conducted over 2 years.
* The main objective is to establish the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative) of IL-8 and IL-6, assayed in the ascites fluid by an automated ELISA in the early diagnosis of SBP.
* The secondary objectives are to confirm the interest of the measurement of leptin in the SBP and to establish the diagnostic performance of IL-8 and IL-6 or leptin according to different clinical features in patients (score Child-Pugh classification and history of SBP, ascitic fluid infection with positive bacterial culture).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Ascitis Parencentesis in SBP
NCT06679842
Laboratory Diagnosis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
NCT05696054
Procalcitonin in Cirrhotic Patients at High Risk for Sepsis
NCT01578226
Imipenem Versus Cefepime in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and to Evaluate the Risk Factors for Treatment Failure
NCT01852630
Procalcitonin in Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patient
NCT04105400
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cirrhosis patient
All consecutive patients with cirrhosis admitted to the five participating center Patients were hospitalized or treated in an ambulatory setting for treatment of ascites or complications of cirrhosis. Ascitic fluid was obtained by paracentesis according to the usual clinical management for these patients.
Ascite liquid puncture
Ascitic fluid obtained by paracentesis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ascite liquid puncture
Ascitic fluid obtained by paracentesis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with social insurance
* Signature of informed consent
* Patient admitted for treatment of ascites or complications of cirrhosis. Diagnosis of cirrhosis relied on clinical, biological and morphological criteria (portal hypertention, hepatic biopsy…).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with chylous ascites or ascites not related to portal hypertention (pancreatic ascites, hemoperitoneum, ascites observed during acute heart failure, peritoneal tuberculosis, hepatocellular carcinome…)
* Patient with obesity severe (IMC ≥ à 35 kg/m2)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
LANDRAUD Luce, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hepato-gastro-enterology and bacteriology department
Brest, , France
Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department
Creil, , France
Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department
Hyères, , France
Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department
Montpellier, , France
Hepato-gastro-enterology and Bacteriology department
Nice, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-API-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.