Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial

NCT ID: NCT01177137

Last Updated: 2018-11-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

151 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT) is to assess the efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) as a treatment for severe debilitating tinnitus. TRT is a non-medical intervention that uses directive counseling (DC) and sound therapy (ST)to habituate the patient's associated negative emotional reactions to tinnitus, its perception, and ultimately, its impact on the patient's life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT), funded by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, is a multi-center randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) versus standard-of-care (SC) treatment in individuals who have self-perceived intolerable tinnitus. TRT is a non-medical intervention that uses directive counseling (DC) and low-level sound therapy (ST) achieved through sound generators (SGs) to habituate the patient's associated negative emotional reactions (annoyance) to tinnitus, its perception (awareness) and, ultimately, its impact on the participant's life. Study participants will include active and retired military personnel of the U. S. Armed Forces and their dependents who suffer from severe tinnitus. The study will be conducted at flagship Air Force, and Navy Medical Centers.

This trial will evaluate the efficacy of TRT and its components (DC and ST) versus the standard of care (SC) as administered in the military by comparing the efficacy of:

* (1) TRT (DC and ST achieved using conventional sound generators) versus SC;
* (2) TRT versus partial TRT (DC and placebo sound generators) to evaluate the separate effect of sound therapy, under the assumption that placebo noise generator will not provide any meaningful sound therapy beyond that found in SC;
* (3) partial TRT versus SC to evaluate the separate effect of DC.

Eligibility will be determined at the Baseline Eligibility Visit, which will consist of a medical and tinnitus history, physical examination, and baseline audiological/tinnitus/hyperacusis evaluation. Study participants will also complete a series of quality of life and psychological profile tests. Study Audiologists will administer the randomly assigned treatment. Follow-up visits at Clinical Centers will take place at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months and include completion of tinnitus outcome questionnaires at all visits. Psychometric testing and audiological/tinnitus/hyperacusis evaluation will take place at the 6, 12, and 18 month visits. Evaluation of audiometric pure tone and loudness discomfort level also will take place at treatment visits.

The primary outcome to be measured in the TRTT will be change in scores on the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) longitudinally assessed between baseline and follow-up (i.e., at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months following treatment). Secondary outcomes include changes in the sub-scales of the TQ, change in scores from the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), and TRT visual analogue scales, and change in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Psychometric secondary outcomes also include change in psychoacoustic variables related to the tinnitus sensation, including tinnitus pitch and loudness match, and loudness discomfort level.

The TRTT is designed to have sufficient power to detect a minimal clinically important difference in the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) i.e., a 10 point difference between TRT and SC groups on change in TQ global scores longitudinally assessed over the course of follow-up and a 7-point difference on TQ score by TRT components, DC and ST.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Subjective Tinnitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TRT

TRT includes treatment with a conventional sound generator (SG) and directive counseling (DC)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional sound generator (SG)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional SGs: Tranquil model sound generators (General Hearing Instruments, Inc.) are either inside or outside-the-ear devices that generate low-level noise, which is set at or just below the patient's mixing point (i.e., the noise level that just blends with the study participant's tinnitus)

Directive Counseling (DC)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Directive Counseling (DC): two-hour educational session during which the patient is given information regarding the nature of the tinnitus problem and related problems such as hearing loss and sound intolerance; visual aids to review the audiological/tinnitus/ hyperacusis evaluation, provide instruction on anatomy and physiology of hearing and tinnitus, introduce the Jastreboff neurophysiological model of tinnitus and related concepts of habituation, and describe and recommend the use of ST and environmental sound in the habituation process.

Partial TRT

Partial TRT includes treatment with a placebo sound generator (placebo SG) and directive counseling (DC).

Group Type OTHER

Placebo sound generator (placebo SG)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tranquil model placebo sound generators (General Hearing Instruments, Inc.) are either inside or outside-the-ear devices that generate a sound different from the active devices.

Directive Counseling (DC)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Directive Counseling (DC): two-hour educational session during which the patient is given information regarding the nature of the tinnitus problem and related problems such as hearing loss and sound intolerance; visual aids to review the audiological/tinnitus/ hyperacusis evaluation, provide instruction on anatomy and physiology of hearing and tinnitus, introduce the Jastreboff neurophysiological model of tinnitus and related concepts of habituation, and describe and recommend the use of ST and environmental sound in the habituation process.

Standard of Care (SC)

The standard of care arm includes care as typically delivered in US military medical centers

Group Type OTHER

Standard of Care (SC)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The standard of care treatment will be similar to that typically provided to patients with severe tinnitus at participating military medical centers and as described in the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Preferred Practice Patterns in Audiology (ASHA, 2006). Tinnitus management will be based on the patient's complaints, history, audiologic evaluation, and self-assessment. The goal of the tinnitus management is to reduce negative cognitive, affective, physical, and behavioral reactions to tinnitus and to improve the patient's well-being and quality of life. Specific treatment recommendations will be individualized to reflect the participant's concerns and abilities, as well as his or her engagement in the decision-making process regarding treatment options.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional sound generator (SG)

Conventional SGs: Tranquil model sound generators (General Hearing Instruments, Inc.) are either inside or outside-the-ear devices that generate low-level noise, which is set at or just below the patient's mixing point (i.e., the noise level that just blends with the study participant's tinnitus)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo sound generator (placebo SG)

Tranquil model placebo sound generators (General Hearing Instruments, Inc.) are either inside or outside-the-ear devices that generate a sound different from the active devices.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard of Care (SC)

The standard of care treatment will be similar to that typically provided to patients with severe tinnitus at participating military medical centers and as described in the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Preferred Practice Patterns in Audiology (ASHA, 2006). Tinnitus management will be based on the patient's complaints, history, audiologic evaluation, and self-assessment. The goal of the tinnitus management is to reduce negative cognitive, affective, physical, and behavioral reactions to tinnitus and to improve the patient's well-being and quality of life. Specific treatment recommendations will be individualized to reflect the participant's concerns and abilities, as well as his or her engagement in the decision-making process regarding treatment options.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Directive Counseling (DC)

Directive Counseling (DC): two-hour educational session during which the patient is given information regarding the nature of the tinnitus problem and related problems such as hearing loss and sound intolerance; visual aids to review the audiological/tinnitus/ hyperacusis evaluation, provide instruction on anatomy and physiology of hearing and tinnitus, introduce the Jastreboff neurophysiological model of tinnitus and related concepts of habituation, and describe and recommend the use of ST and environmental sound in the habituation process.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Directive Counseling (DC)

Directive Counseling (DC): two-hour educational session during which the patient is given information regarding the nature of the tinnitus problem and related problems such as hearing loss and sound intolerance; visual aids to review the audiological/tinnitus/ hyperacusis evaluation, provide instruction on anatomy and physiology of hearing and tinnitus, introduce the Jastreboff neurophysiological model of tinnitus and related concepts of habituation, and describe and recommend the use of ST and environmental sound in the habituation process.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or above
* Subjective severe tinnitus, defined as a score on the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) greater than or equal to 40
* Eligible for care at a Department of Defense Clinical Center
* Speaks English well enough to complete a series of questionnaires and benefit from counseling

Exclusion Criteria

* Involvement in pending tinnitus-related financial claims or litigation except that associated with usual Veterans' Administration retirement claims
* Tinnitus of less than 12 months duration
* Treatment for tinnitus within previous 12 months
* Routine unavoidable exposure to hazardous noise
* Use of a cancer chemotherapeutic drug within previous 12 months
* Treatment for head or neck injury within previous 24 months
* Treatment for an emotional, psychological, or psychiatric condition within previous 12 months resulting in inability to participate in the trial or complete all followup visits, as assessed by best clinical judgment
* Requirement for use of an ototoxic drug
* Hearing impairment, defined by audiometric thresholds \> 30 dB HL at and below 2,000 Hz and \> 40 dB HL at 4,000 and 8,000 Hz
* Required use of hearing aids
* Fluctuating hearing loss at a level that would interfere with the reliability of study results
* One or more prominent spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, defined as the presence of a spontaneous otoacoustic emission spike that is 3 or more times larger than the measured variation in amplitude across the remaining frequency range and/or if the emission corresponds in pitch to the tinnitus pitch
* Pulsatile somatosounds suggesting presence of abnormal vasculature or high blood pressure contributing to the tinnitus
* Feigning tinnitus or hearing loss
* Evidence by audiological testing of a treatable etiology of the tinnitus, such as conductive hearing impairment as shown by pure-tone thresholds, abnormal acoustic immittance, abnormal stapedial reflex test, or abnormal auditory brainstem response
* Predisposing disease with tinnitus symptoms amenable to medical or surgical intervention, including but not limited to; chronic otitis media, otosclerosis, vestibular disorder or dizziness, Eustachian tube, middle ear, or inner ear disease, Lyme disease or ear autoimmune disease, malocclusion or temporomandibular joint disease, uncontrolled allergies, aberrant ear, head, or neck blood vasculature or glomus tumor, neurological condition such as multiple sclerosis or ear-related demyelinating disease, perilymphatic fistula, or facial weakness or paralysis
* Meniere's disease
* Uncontrolled diabetes, defined as blood glucose consistently ≥ 200 mg/dl or an HBA1c above 8%
* Evidence from any laboratory study that suggests an etiology for the tinnitus that is treatable, including, but not limited to, abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) or thyroid hormone (T3 or T4) levels, positive fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA) test, or positive Lyme titer
* Evidence of a tumor contributing to the tinnitus, including an acoustic neuroma (or vestibular schwannoma), cerebellopontine angle tumor, skull base tumor, or any other type of tumor that the examining physician believes is responsible for the tinnitus
* Diagnosis of traumatic head or brain injury requiring treatment
* Diagnosis of an emotional, psychological, or psychiatric condition requiring treatment and resulting in inability to participate in the trial or complete all followup visits, as assessed by best clinical judgment
* Inability or unwillingness of patient to comply with study requirements
* Unwillingness of Clinical Center Director to randomize the patient to treatment due to the presence of any condition, physical, mental or social, which is likely to affect the patient returning for follow-up visits on schedule or which is likely to impair his or her performance on the functional tests
* Inability or unwillingness of patient to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

59th Medical Wing

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

United States Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

C. Craig Formby, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

Roberta W Scherer, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton

Camp Pendleton, California, United States

Site Status

Naval Medical Center

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

David Grant Medical Center

Travis Air Force Base, California, United States

Site Status

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Wilford Hall Medical Center

Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, United States

Site Status

Portsmouth Naval Medical Center

Portsmouth, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scherer RW, Formby C, Gold S, Erdman S, Rodhe C, Carlson M, Shade D, Tucker M, Sensinger LM, Hughes G, Conley GS, Downey N, Eades C, Jylkka M, Haber-Perez A, Harper C, Russell SK, Sierra-Irizarry B, Sullivan M; Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial Research Group. The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Oct 15;15:396. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-396.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25319676 (View on PubMed)

Formby C, Scherer R; TRTT Study Group. Rationale for the tinnitus retraining therapy trial. Noise Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;15(63):134-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.110299.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23571304 (View on PubMed)

Formby C, Yang X, Scherer RW. Contributions of Counseling and Sound Generator Use in Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Treatment Response Dynamics Assessed in a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Feb 9;65(2):816-828. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00210. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35073492 (View on PubMed)

Scherer RW, Erdman SA, Gold S, Formby C; TRTT Research Group. Treatment fidelity in the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial. Trials. 2020 Jul 23;21(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04530-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32703244 (View on PubMed)

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial Research Group; Scherer RW, Formby C. Effect of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy vs Standard of Care on Tinnitus-Related Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul 1;145(7):597-608. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0821.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31120533 (View on PubMed)

Scherer RW, Sensinger LD, Sierra-Irizarry B, Formby C; TRTT Research Group. Lessons learned conducting a multi-center trial with a military population: The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial. Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):429-435. doi: 10.1177/1740774518777709. Epub 2018 May 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29792074 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01DC007422

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01DC007422

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intervention for Reduced Sound Tolerance
NCT00890526 COMPLETED PHASE1