Performance of the Tasman Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) System

NCT ID: NCT01171066

Last Updated: 2021-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Assessment of the performance of the Tasman CPAP system in treating obstructive sleep apnea. The purpose of this study is to (1) evaluate the performance of this system in the efficacy of the treatment in comparison to S8 Escape, and (2) to evaluate the performance of the Tasman device via subjective assessment of comfort and ease of breathing compared to the participant's current CPAP device.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a condition characterised by partial or complete collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The treatment of choice for OSA is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). CPAP acts as a positive airway splint, delivering a fixed positive airway pressure to the upper airway via a tube and mask. The mask is attached to the participant's nose via head straps. The type of mask used is dependent upon participant choice and comfort and the mask that provides the best fit.

Some participants stop using CPAP therapy finding it difficult to tolerate due to leak issues or discomfort from their nasal mask. Another frequent concern is mask dislodgment while sleeping causing leaks and consequently waking the patient up.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of the Tasman CPAP system via objective and subjective assessment of comfort and ease of breathing compared to the participant's current CPAP device.

Aim

* To determine if the efficacy of the treatment is clinically equivalent to or better than the predicate device (S8 Escape)
* To evaluate the performance of the Tasman CPAP system in terms of comfort of breathing and general ease of use

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tasman CPAP

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tasman CPAP system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will trial the Tasman CPAP system for a duration of 1 week in place of their current CPAP system.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tasman CPAP system

Participants will trial the Tasman CPAP system for a duration of 1 week in place of their current CPAP system.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ResMed Tasman

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients willing to give written informed consent
* Patients who can read and comprehend English
* Patients being treated for OSA for \>6 months
* Patients using a ResMed nasal mask system
* Patients who can trial the trial mask for 7 nights

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not willing to give written informed consent
* Patients who can not read and comprehend English
* Patients being treated for OSA for \<6 months
* Patients using an inappropriate mask system
* Patients using Bilevel flow generators
* Patients who are not using CPAP between 7 and 13 cmH2O
* Patients who are pregnant
* Patients who cannot trial the trial mask for 7 nights
* Patients with a hearing impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ResMed

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Klaus Schindhelm

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ResMed

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ResMed Ltd

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MA14010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CPAP In-home Assessment NZ
NCT02804919 COMPLETED NA
CPAP In-home Assessment Australia
NCT02809794 COMPLETED NA
Effect of CPAP on Biomarkers in Patients With OSA
NCT01138865 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Performance of the Salt Lake Mask System
NCT01395693 COMPLETED PHASE2