Left Atrial Distensibility to Predict Prognosis in Consecutive Patients

NCT ID: NCT01171040

Last Updated: 2011-03-08

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Total Enrollment: 2000 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2009-07-31
• Study Completion Date: 2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) has prognostic significance in patients with heart failure. Traditionally, it should be assessed by invasive method, as cardiac catheterization and Swan-Gung catheter. In advance of new techniques and modality, echocardiography provides some useful parameters for assessing LVFP, such myocardial tissue Doppler imaging. Many articles had documented that peak velocity of early-diastolic trans-mitral inflow velocity divided by early-diastolic velocity over mitral annulus correlated closely to LVFP. However, myocardial tissue Doppler only provides the information of regional myocardium, so patients with regional wall motion abnormality, as coronary artery disease, can't be assessed by this method without handicap. In addition, conduction disturbance, like bundle branch block, also influences the result of myocardial tissue Doppler. For resolving those problems, the investigators had designed a new global parameter to assess LVFP. In the investigators prior study, left atrial distensibility correlated logarithmically to LVFP in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and also in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Left atrial distensibility provided a new viewpoint to assess left ventricular diastolic function and to predict prognosis. This time, to extend left atrial distensibility to general population received echocardiographic examination for predicting prognosis is attempted.

Detailed Description

Introduction High left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) have been associated with volume overload in patients with heart failure and have also been correlated to some extent with more severe symptoms and lower survival rates. In a study of more than 1000 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure, those with persistently elevated LVFP more than 18 mmHg had increased 1-year mortality compared with those with LVFP less than 16 mmHg. Investigators have also demonstrated that acute reduction of LVFP with vasodilator therapy can improve cardiac function and reduce mortality risk, suggesting that LVFP is an appropriate marker of cardiac risk and functional improvement. However, LVFP measurement involves invasive catheterization, limiting its clinical use especially in the outpatient setting. In advance of new techniques and modality, echocardiography provides some useful parameters to assess LVFP, such myocardial tissue Doppler imaging. Many articles had documented that peak velocity of early-diastolic trans-mitral inflow velocity divided by early-diastolic velocity over mitral annulus was closed correlated with LVFP. However, myocardial tissue Doppler only provides the information of regional myocardium, so patients with regional wall motion abnormality, such as coronary artery disease, can't be assessed by this method without handicap. In addition, conduction disturbance, like bundle branch block, also influences the result of myocardial tissue Doppler. For resolving those problems, we will design a new global parameter to assess LVFP. In prior study, we disclosed the logarithmic relationship between LVFP and left atrial distensibility in acute myocardial infarction patient received primary coronary intervention. This time, to extend our conclusion to general population received echocardiographic examination is attempted. Additionally, we infer that left atrial distensibility which indicates LVFP would influence long-term prognosis, including the event rate of cardiovascular event, stroke and death.

Purpose Left atrial size, particularly left atrial volume, has been recognized as a marker of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Contrary to flow and tissue Doppler parameters, left atrial volume is independent of acute volume load and therefore may provide a more accurate assessment of acute and chronic left ventricular dysfunction. In addition, the measurement of left atrial volume is lack of some handicaps of tissue Doppler, including regional myocardial dysfunction in coronary artery disease and bundle branch block. In recent studies, end-systolic left atrial volume (maximal left atrial volume) was useful to predict the risk of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The short-term and long-term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction was also associated with left atrial volume. In patients with mitral regurgitation, it could be used to reliably estimate the regurgitant volume. Despite end-systolic left atrial volume provides prognostic significance in many disease entities, left atrium is filling and empty in dynamic cyclic motion, so we speculate that left atrial distensibility, defined as the percentage change of left atrial volume between end-systolic and end-diastolic phase, has more prognostic power to represent LVFP and to predict the prognosis. Based on the phenomenon of that higher LVFP, which will conduct to and stretch left atrium in diastolic phase, induces left atrial distension and makes the reduction of distensibility between end-systolic and end-diastolic phases, we had proved the logarithmic relationship between left atrial distensibility and LVFP.

Materials and Methods

Subjects:

2000 consecutive patients received echocardiographic examinations will be enrolled. The exclusion criteria are including (1) patients with prosthetic mitral valves or mitral stenosis, (2) rhythm other than sinus rhythm, (3) age more than 18 years-old, (4) inadequate image quality, (5) lack of informed consent.

Traditional echocardiographic measurement and myocardial tissue Doppler:

All studies are performed by experienced sonographers and reviewed by staff cardiologists with advanced training in echocardiography. Left ventricular function is assessed by Simpson's method. Mitral regurgitation is graded with color flow imaging. Mitral inflow is assessed with pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography form the apical 4-chamber view. The Doppler bean is aligned parallel to the direction of flow, and a 1- to 2-mm sample volume is placed between the tips of mitral leaflets during diastole. From the mitral inflow profile, the E- and A-wave velocity, E-deceleration time, and E/A velocity ration are measured. Pulmonary venous flow is recorded with pulsed-wave Doppler with a sample volume placed 1 cm into the right upper pulmonary vein. The flow velocities are recorded, and the ratio of systolic to diastolic forward flow (S/D ratio) is calculated. Doppler tissue imaging of mitral annulus over septal, lateral and inferior borders is also obtained from apical views. Diastolic filling is categorized as normal (grade 0), impaired relaxation (grade 1), pseudonormalization (grade 2), and restrictive (grade 3) by a combination of transmitral and pulmonary flow patterns as validated previously.

Left atrial volume measurement:

Left atrial volume is assessed by the biplane area-length method from apical 4- and 2-chamber views. The volumes are measured at end-systolic (just before mitral valve opening or the largest dimension), pre-atrial contraction (just before P wave), and end-diastolic (the smallest dimension or the onset of QRS complex), using the highest frame rate. The left atrial outlines at those three phases retrace off-line for three consecutive beats, then average. The recesses of the pulmonary veins and the left atrial appendage are excluded. The length of left atrium is that of the perpendicular line measured from the middle of the plane of the mitral annulus to the superior aspect of the left atrium. The left atrial volume is calculated as: 0.85 x 4-chamber area x 2-chamber area ÷ the shorter of the two lengths. The volume is indexed for body surface area. Left atrial distensibility is defined as: (end-systole left atrial volume - end-diastole left atrial volume) ÷ end-systole left atrial volume. Left atrial ejection fraction is calculated as: (pre-atrial contraction volume - end-diastole left atrial volume) ÷ pre-atrial contraction volume.

Follow-up:

Clinical outcomes are determined 1-year after indexed examination. Follow-up included assessment for the occurrence of sudden death, heart failure with hospitalization, atrial fibrillation, stroke, and death (both cardiac and non-cardiac) per 3 months by telephone interview.

Interobserver variability:

In all cases, atrial volume is measured by two observers independently. Interobserver variability is calculated as the difference between the values obtained by the tow observers divided by the mean.

Statistical analysis:

SPSS software is used for statistical analysis. All continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic characteristics is performed by chi-square analysis for categorical variables and by Student t test for echocardiography and other continuous variables. A p value < 0.05 is considered significant. Patients will be subdivided to four quartiles according to left atrial distensibility. Unadjusted survival curves are produced using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test is used to compare survival curves. Adjusted survival curves are constructed using variables entered into the Cox model set to their mean values in the total population. The hazard ratio of low left atrial distensibility will be assessed by comparing quartile to quartile.

Conditions

Heart Failure; Atrial Fibrillation; Stroke

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Consecutive patients received echocardiographic examinations

Consecutive patients received echocardiography are willing to participate in this study.

Echocardiography, including the measurements of left atrial (LA) distensibility

Intervention Type: OTHER

The LA volumes were measured at three points: 1) immediately before the mitral valve opening (maximal LV volume or Volmax); 2) at onset of the P-wave on electrocardiography (pre-atrial contraction volume or Volp); and 3) at mitral valve closure (minimal LV volume or Volmin). The LA distensibility was calculated as (Volmax - Volmin)x 100% / Volmin. The LA ejection fraction was calculated as (Volp - Volmin)x 100% / Volp. In all patients, LA volumes were indexed to body surface area (BSA).

Interventions

Echocardiography, including the measurements of left atrial (LA) distensibility

The LA volumes were measured at three points: 1) immediately before the mitral valve opening (maximal LV volume or Volmax); 2) at onset of the P-wave on electrocardiography (pre-atrial contraction volume or Volp); and 3) at mitral valve closure (minimal LV volume or Volmin). The LA distensibility was calculated as (Volmax - Volmin)x 100% / Volmin. The LA ejection fraction was calculated as (Volp - Volmin)x 100% / Volp. In all patients, LA volumes were indexed to body surface area (BSA).

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• consecutive patients received echocardiographic examination are willing to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

• (1) patients with prosthetic mitral valves, or mitral stenosis
• (2) rhythm other than sinus rhythm
• (3) age less than 18 years-old
• (4) inadequate image quality
• (5) lack of informed consent

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Principal Investigators

Shih-Hung Hsiao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Locations

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Taiwan

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Jong-Khing Huang, MD

Role: CONTACT

irb@vghks.gov.tw

886-7-3422121 ext. 1518

Facility Contacts

Jong-Khing Huang, MD

Role: primary

irb@vghks.gov.tw

886-7-3422121 ext. 1518

Shih-Hung Hsiao, MD

Role: backup

a841120@kimo.com

886-7-3422121 ext. 2011

References

Kasner M, Westermann D, Steendijk P, Gaub R, Wilkenshoff U, Weitmann K, Hoffmann W, Poller W, Schultheiss HP, Pauschinger M, Tschope C. Utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of diastolic function in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: a comparative Doppler-conductance catheterization study. Circulation. 2007 Aug 7;116(6):637-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.661983. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17646587 (View on PubMed)

Agricola E, Galderisi M, Oppizzi M, Melisurgo G, Airoldi F, Margonato A. Doppler tissue imaging: a reliable method for estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in patients with mitral regurgitation. Am Heart J. 2005 Sep;150(3):610-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.046.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16169349 (View on PubMed)

Appleton CP, Galloway JM, Gonzalez MS, Gaballa M, Basnight MA. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressures using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in adult patients with cardiac disease. Additional value of analyzing left atrial size, left atrial ejection fraction and the difference in duration of pulmonary venous and mitral flow velocity at atrial contraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):1972-82. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90787-2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 8245357 (View on PubMed)

Rossi A, Cicoira M, Zanolla L, Sandrini R, Golia G, Zardini P, Enriquez-Sarano M. Determinants and prognostic value of left atrial volume in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 16;40(8):1425. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02305-7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12392832 (View on PubMed)

Simek CL, Feldman MD, Haber HL, Wu CC, Jayaweera AR, Kaul S. Relationship between left ventricular wall thickness and left atrial size: comparison with other measures of diastolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995 Jan-Feb;8(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(05)80356-6.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7710749 (View on PubMed)

Moller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK, Seward JB, Reeder GS, Wright RS, Park SW, Bailey KR, Pellikka PA. Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003 May 6;107(17):2207-12. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000066318.21784.43. Epub 2003 Apr 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12695291 (View on PubMed)

Beinart R, Boyko V, Schwammenthal E, Kuperstein R, Sagie A, Hod H, Matetzky S, Behar S, Eldar M, Feinberg MS. Long-term prognostic significance of left atrial volume in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 21;44(2):327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.062.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15261927 (View on PubMed)

Hsiao SH, Huang WC, Lin KL, Chiou KR, Kuo FY, Lin SK, Cheng CC. Left atrial distensibility and left ventricular filling pressure in acute versus chronic severe mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 1;105(5):709-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.052.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 20185021 (View on PubMed)

Hsiao SH, Chiou KR. Renal function decline predicted by left atrial expansion index in non-diabetic cohort with preserved systolic heart function. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May 1;18(5):521-528. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew224.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 28064152 (View on PubMed)

Hsiao SH, Chiou KR. Left atrial expansion index predicts atrial fibrillation in dyspnea. Circ J. 2013;77(11):2712-21. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0463. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 23892385 (View on PubMed)

Hsiao SH, Chiou KR. Left atrial expansion index predicts all-cause mortality and heart failure admissions in dyspnoea. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Nov;15(11):1245-52. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft087. Epub 2013 May 22.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 23703107 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

http://www.grb.gov.tw/index.htm

Government Research Bulletin

Other Identifiers

VGHKS99-015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id