Reduced Intensity Haploidentical Transplant for Hematological Malignancies

NCT ID: NCT01162096

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many patients with hematological malignancies (leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma) cannot undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) because they do not have a well matched donor. HSCT from partially matched family donors (haploidentical HSCT) is an option for most patients but has been associated with poor outcomes. This study was designed to test whether using an exact amount of a donor's lymphocytes (white cells) and dividing the transplant process into 2 steps, would increase overall survival by decreasing complications. The therapy is reduced intensity so it is targeted, but not limited to, patients over the age of 65 or those who have had previous transplants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant is a life saving therapy for patients who are without well matched donors. This type of therapy has been associated with poor outcomes in the past due to complications such as infection. The Jefferson 2 Step approach was designed to allow the infusion of an exact dose of tolerized lymphocytes in haploidentical transplant in order to allow for immune reconstitution post transplant to avoid infectious complications while still having acceptable rates of GVHD. In this approach, older patients or patients who were transplanted previously with high-risk hematological malignancies undergo chemotherapy with fludarabine and cytarabine or thiotepa. The patients then receive an exact dose of their donors' lymphocytes. The phase I portion of the study determined the optimal dose of lymphocytes. Two days after receiving the donor lymphocytes, the patients receive 2 daily doses of cyclophosphamide. The purpose of the cyclophosphamide is for in-vivo tolerization of the lymphocytes. One day after receiving cyclophosphamide, the patients receive stem cell from their donor. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are used as GVHD prophylaxis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hematological Malignancies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transplantation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients undergoing reduced intensity haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant from a partially matched related donor.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Haploidentical Allogeneic Transplantation

Patients undergoing reduced intensity haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant from a partially matched related donor.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CliniMACS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Any patient with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis in which allogeneic HSCT is thought to be beneficial, and in whom front-line therapy has already been applied.
2. Patients must have a related donor who is a two or more allele mismatch at the HLA-A;B; C; DR loci.
3. Patients who have sibling donors with a one antigen mismatch due to recombination will not be enrolled in this protocol.
4. Patients must adequate organ function:

1. LVEF of \>45%
2. DLCO \>45% of predicted corrected for hemoglobin
3. Adequate liver function as defined by a serum bilirubin \<1.8, AST or ALT \< 2.5X upper limit of normal
4. Serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dl or creatinine clearance of \> 40 ml/min
5. Performance status \> 70% (Karnofsky)
6. Patients must be willing to use contraception if they have childbearing potential
7. Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Performance status of \< 70% (Karnofsky)
2. HIV positive
3. Active involvement of the central nervous system with malignancy
4. Psychiatric disorder that would preclude patients from signing an informed consent
5. Pregnancy
6. Patients with life expectancy of \< 6 months for reasons other than their underlying hematologic/oncologic disorder or complications there from.
7. Patients who have received alemtuzumab within 8 weeks of transplant admission, or who have recently received horse or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and have ATG levels of \> 2 µgm/ml.
8. Patients who cannot receive cyclophosphamide
9. Patients with evidence of another malignancy, exclusive of a skin cancer that requires only local treatment, should not be enrolled on this protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neal Flomenberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Thomas Jefferson University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.KimmelCancerCenter.org

Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, an NCI-Designated Cancer Center

http://www.JeffersonHospital.org

Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006-29

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

JT 1149

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

06U.328

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bone Marrow Grafting for Leukemia and Lymphoma
NCT00186147 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION