Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-08-31
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quantitative Methods for Supplementing Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Cancer
NCT02058758
Investigation of Diagnostic Improvement Gained Through Optimization of MR Methods for Breast Cancer Detection
NCT02411760
Breast MRI Spectroscopy
NCT00577915
Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by the Use of Breast Proton MR Spectroscopy
NCT00580086
Comparison Study of Breast Computed Tomography (CT) With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
NCT00957099
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Follow-up contact will occur within one year after the MRI to determine whether a pathology report is available.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy Volunteers
Five healthy women will be screened for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contraindications, and then undergo contrast injection, and SWIFT acquisition.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Patients and healthy volunteers will be first screened for MRI contraindications. The SWIFT MRI workflow will be performed as follows:
* an IV line is placed by nurse,
* patient is placed in the 4 T MRI scanner at CMRR,
* initial scout images and manual linear shims are adjusted,
* Pre-contrast SWIFT T1 weighted images and T1 map are obtained,
* continuous SWIFT acquisition begins immediately before contrast injection,
* contrast injection,
* continuous SWIFT acquisition continues for 12 min after contrast,
* late enhancement images may also be obtained.
10 and 30 patients will be scanned in the first and second year, respectively. Thresholds will be set for prospective analysis. SWIFT-DCE diagnostic performance will be compared to prior FLASH-DCE methods.
Breast Cancer Patients
40 breast cancer patients who have suspected breast lesion that will be biopsied will be screened for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contraindications, and then undergo contrast injection and SWIFT acquisition.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Patients and healthy volunteers will be first screened for MRI contraindications. The SWIFT MRI workflow will be performed as follows:
* an IV line is placed by nurse,
* patient is placed in the 4 T MRI scanner at CMRR,
* initial scout images and manual linear shims are adjusted,
* Pre-contrast SWIFT T1 weighted images and T1 map are obtained,
* continuous SWIFT acquisition begins immediately before contrast injection,
* contrast injection,
* continuous SWIFT acquisition continues for 12 min after contrast,
* late enhancement images may also be obtained.
10 and 30 patients will be scanned in the first and second year, respectively. Thresholds will be set for prospective analysis. SWIFT-DCE diagnostic performance will be compared to prior FLASH-DCE methods.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Patients and healthy volunteers will be first screened for MRI contraindications. The SWIFT MRI workflow will be performed as follows:
* an IV line is placed by nurse,
* patient is placed in the 4 T MRI scanner at CMRR,
* initial scout images and manual linear shims are adjusted,
* Pre-contrast SWIFT T1 weighted images and T1 map are obtained,
* continuous SWIFT acquisition begins immediately before contrast injection,
* contrast injection,
* continuous SWIFT acquisition continues for 12 min after contrast,
* late enhancement images may also be obtained.
10 and 30 patients will be scanned in the first and second year, respectively. Thresholds will be set for prospective analysis. SWIFT-DCE diagnostic performance will be compared to prior FLASH-DCE methods.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Ferromagnetic implants
* History of shotgun wounds and shrapnel
* Obesity (\>250 pounds)
* Cardiac pacemaker
* Incompatible implanted medical device
* Severe claustrophobia
* Major surgeries with potential of ferromagnetic implants
* Severe asthma and allergies
* i-STAT system, a handheld blood analyzer (I-STAT) creatinine test, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<30
* Metallic object (greater than 2 cm in length) in the breast
* Metallic ink tatoo within 20 cm of the breast (approximately 8 inches)
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Curtis Corum, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Corum CA, Idiyatullin D, Snyder CJ, Garwood M. Gap cycling for SWIFT. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Feb;73(2):677-82. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25141. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Park JY, Garwood M. Fast and quiet MRI using a swept radiofrequency. J Magn Reson. 2006 Aug;181(2):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.05.014. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
Nelson MT, Benson JC, Prescott T, Corum CA, Snyder A, Garwood M. Breast MRI using SWeep Imaging with Fourier Transform (SWIFT). Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81 Suppl 1(0 1):S109. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(12)70044-X. No abstract available.
Corum CA, Benson JC, Idiyatullin D, Snyder AL, Snyder CJ, Hutter D, Everson LI, Eberly LE, Nelson MT, Garwood M. High-spatial- and high-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR breast imaging with sweep imaging with Fourier transformation: a pilot study. Radiology. 2015 Feb;274(2):540-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131273. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0907M69461
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2009NTLS055
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.