MK0653C in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With High Cholesterol (Switch Study)(MK-0653C-162)

NCT ID: NCT01154036

Last Updated: 2022-02-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1547 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of switching to co-administration of ezetimibe and atorvastatin versus treatment with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin in high cardiovascular risk patients with hypercholesterolemia who have not achieved specified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The primary hypothesis is that the co-administration of ezetimibe 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg will be superior to both atorvastatin 20 mg and rosuvastatin 10 mg with respect to the percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) after 6 weeks of treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a 18 week randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study composed of a 6 week screening/run-in and 12 week double-blind treatment period (composed of 2 phases; each 6 weeks in duration). Only those participants who do not meet low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goals at the end of Phase I (Week 6), were eligible to continue into Phase II (Week 12).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypercholesterolemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Phase I: ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mg

Co-administration of EZ 10 mg tablet + Atorva 10 mg tablet; once daily for 6 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ezetimibe 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mg

Atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mg

Rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Comparator: rosuvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg

Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ezetimibe 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]

Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ezetimibe 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phase II: Atorva 40mg

Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]

Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ezetimibe 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg

Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Comparator: rosuvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ezetimibe 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparator: rosuvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is at high cardiovascular risk and meets one of the following conditions: has never taken lipid-lowering therapy or has been off such therapy for at least 6 weeks; or, is currently taking a stable dose of certain lipid-lowering agents
* Patient is willing to maintain a cholesterol lowering diet during the study
* Female patients receiving non-cyclical hormone therapy have maintained a stable dose and regimen for at least 8 weeks and are willing to continue the same regimen during the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is Asian
* Patient routinely has more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day
* Female patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
* Patient has congestive heart failure
* Patient has had a myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, angioplasty, or acute coronary syndrome within 3 months of screening
* Patient has uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias
* Patient has had a partial ileal or gastric bypass or other significant intestinal malabsorption
* Patient has uncontrolled high blood pressure
* Patient has kidney disease
* Patient has any disease known to influence blood lipid levels
* Patient has any disorders of the blood, digestive system, or nervous system including stroke and degenerative disease that would limit study participation
* Patient has poorly controlled or newly diagnosed diabetes
* Patient is known to be HIV positive
* Patient has a history of cancer in the last 5 years, except certain skin and cervical cancers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Organon and Co

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Monitor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Krempf M, Simpson RJ Jr, Ramey DR, Brudi P, Giezek H, Tomassini JE, Lee R, Farnier M. Patient and physician factors influence decision-making in hypercholesterolemia: a questionnaire-based survey. Lipids Health Dis. 2015 May 19;14:45. doi: 10.1186/s12944-015-0037-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25985907 (View on PubMed)

Bays HE, Averna M, Majul C, Muller-Wieland D, De Pellegrin A, Giezek H, Lee R, Lowe RS, Brudi P, Triscari J, Farnier M. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to atorvastatin versus atorvastatin uptitration or switching to rosuvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 15;112(12):1885-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24063830 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010_517

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

0653C-162

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.