Trial Outcomes & Findings for MK0653C in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With High Cholesterol (Switch Study)(MK-0653C-162) (NCT NCT01154036)
NCT ID: NCT01154036
Last Updated: 2022-02-09
Results Overview
LDL-C levels measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4. LDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald method when triglyceride (TG)\<350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L) and beta quantification ultracentrifugation when TG≥350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1547 participants
Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I )
2022-02-09
Participant Flow
Participants in the Atorvastatin 20mg and Rosuvastatin 10mg arms who did not meet low density lipoprotein-cholesterol goals during Phase I were eligible for Phase II. Approximately 25% of participants in the ezetimibe 10mg+atorvastatin10mg arm continued to Phase II regardless of LDL-C control but were not included in any of the statistical analyses
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Phase I: Ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + Atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mg
Co-administration of EZ 10 mg tablet + Atorva 10 mg tablet; once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mg
Atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mg
Rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks;
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase I
STARTED
|
120
|
483
|
944
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase I
COMPLETED
|
117
|
455
|
888
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase I
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
28
|
56
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase II
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
124
|
126
|
234
|
206
|
|
Phase II
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
27
|
116
|
121
|
225
|
200
|
|
Phase II
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
8
|
5
|
9
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Phase I: Ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + Atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mg
Co-administration of EZ 10 mg tablet + Atorva 10 mg tablet; once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mg
Atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mg
Rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks;
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase I
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase I
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase I
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
3
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase I
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
10
|
29
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase I
Adverse Event
|
1
|
11
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase II
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Phase II
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Phase II
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
|
Phase II
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase II
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
MK0653C in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With High Cholesterol (Switch Study)(MK-0653C-162)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Phase I: Ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + Atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mg
n=120 Participants
Co-administration of EZ 10 mg tablet + Atorva 10 mg tablet; once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mg
n=483 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mg
n=944 Participants
Rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks
|
Total
n=1547 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<20 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
20 to 29 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
30 to 39 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
40 to 49 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
165 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
50 to 59 years
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
324 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
531 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
60 to 64 years
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
183 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
297 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
310 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
508 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
253 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
489 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
813 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
230 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
455 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
734 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I )Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participant who received at least one dose of study drug during Phase I and had a baseline or at least one measurement available during Phase I
LDL-C levels measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4. LDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald method when triglyceride (TG)\<350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L) and beta quantification ultracentrifugation when TG≥350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=939 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Phase I)
|
-24.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.6
|
-10.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 20.8
|
-13.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 22.8
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
LDL-C levels measured at Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6. LDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald method when triglyceride (TG)\<350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L) and beta quantification ultracentrifugation when TG ≥350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Phase II).
|
-16.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 31.1
|
-8.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.3
|
-19.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 32.1
|
-8.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 20.8
|
2.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 27.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6 (End of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I and had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=119 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=471 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=915 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 100 mg/dL (Phase I)
|
56.3 Percentage of Participants
4.55
|
37.4 Percentage of Participants
2.23
|
43.6 Percentage of Participants
1.64
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (End of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II and had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=123 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=228 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=201 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 100 mg/dL (Phase II)
|
55.8 Percentage of Participants
4.53
|
34.1 Percentage of Participants
4.28
|
53.5 Percentage of Participants
3.30
|
35.8 Percentage of Participants
3.38
|
NA Percentage of Participants
Study plan did not include the collection of data for this arm for this Phase II endpoint; data not obtained or recorded
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6 (End of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I and had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=119 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=471 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=915 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 70 mg/dL (Phase I)
|
19.3 Percentage of Participants
3.62
|
3.0 Percentage of Participants
0.78
|
6.6 Percentage of Participants
0.82
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II and had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=123 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=228 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=201 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 70 mg/dL (Phase II)
|
18.3 Percentage of Participants
3.53
|
0.8 Percentage of Participants
0.81
|
15.4 Percentage of Participants
2.39
|
3.0 Percentage of Participants
1.20
|
NA Percentage of Participants
Study plan did not include the collection of data for this arm for this Phase II endpoint; data not obtained or recorded
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
TC measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=939 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) (Phase I)
|
-13.6 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 17.0
|
-6.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 14.1
|
-8.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase I) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
TC levels measured at Baseline (end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) (Phase II)
|
-10.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 19.9
|
-2.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
-13.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 22.8
|
-5.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 14.0
|
2.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I and had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
TG measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4. Baseline and post-baseline measurements were log-transformed in the response vector, with fixed effects for treatment, time and the interaction of time by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=119 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=471 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=915 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) (Phase I)
|
-6.0 Percentage Change
Interval -10.9 to -0.8
|
-3.9 Percentage Change
Interval -6.5 to -1.2
|
-1.1 Percentage Change
Interval -3.1 to 0.9
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase I) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II and had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
TG levels measured at Baseline (Week 6: end of Phase I) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6. Baseline and post-baseline measurements were log-transformed in the response vector, with fixed effects for treatment, time and the interaction of time by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=123 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=228 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=201 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) (Phase II)
|
-5.9 Percentage Change
Interval -11.0 to -0.4
|
-3.1 Percentage Change
Interval -8.4 to 2.4
|
-10.2 Percentage Change
Interval -13.9 to -6.4
|
-3.2 Percentage Change
Interval -7.3 to 1.2
|
NA Percentage Change
Study plan did not include the calculation of these values
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
HDL-C measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=939 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Phase I)
|
0.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
-1.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
1.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase I) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
HDL-C levels measured at Baseline (end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C (Phase II)
|
0.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 14.1
|
1.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 16.0
|
-0.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
0.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
0.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
Apo-B measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=479 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=938 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) (Phase I)
|
-12.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 20.7
|
-6.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 20.7
|
-7.6 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 20.1
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
Apo-B levels measured at Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=27 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B (Phase II)
|
-12.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 26.5
|
-6.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
-14.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 25.1
|
-4.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
-4.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
Apo-A-I measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=479 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=938 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) (Phase I)
|
-0.6 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
-1.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
1.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase I) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
Apo-A-I levels measured at Baseline (end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=27 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-I (Phase II)
|
1.6 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
1.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 14.1
|
-0.6 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 14.4
|
0.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 16.0
|
-0.7 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 14.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
Non-HDL-C measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=939 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C (Phase I)
|
-18.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 22.3
|
-7.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 17.6
|
-11.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 19.8
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase I) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
Non-HDL-C levels calculated at Baseline (end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C (Phase II)
|
-17.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 26.1
|
-5.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 16.6
|
-18.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 29.4
|
-6.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 18.5
|
-0.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
TC/HDL-C ratio calculated at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=939 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio (Phase I)
|
-14.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 17.9
|
-4.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
-9.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
TC/HDL-C Ratio calculated at Baseline (end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio (Phase II)
|
-13.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 21.7
|
-6.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
-11.7 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.3
|
-4.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 17.8
|
-1.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 9.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
LDL-C/HDL-C ratio calculated at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=939 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio (Phase I)
|
-23.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.6
|
-7.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.2
|
-14.7 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 26.9
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio calculated at Baseline (end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio (Phase II)
|
-20.6 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 31.4
|
-8.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 20.6
|
-18.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 31.6
|
-7.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
-4.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 22.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
Apo B/Apo A-I ratio calculated at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=479 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=938 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-I Ratio (Phase I)
|
-13.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 22.3
|
-4.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
-8.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
Apo B/Apo A-I Ratio calculated at Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=27 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-I Ratio (Phase II)
|
-11.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 26.2
|
-6.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 19.4
|
-11.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 27.5
|
-5.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
-6.7 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 11.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I or had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
Non HDL-C/HDL-C ratio calculated at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=120 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=480 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=939 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio (Phase I)
|
-18.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.9
|
-6.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 22.8
|
-12.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 25.9
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II or had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
Non HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio calculated at baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio (Phase II)
|
-18.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 29.5
|
-8.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
-16.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 32.3
|
-5.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.4
|
-1.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I)Population: Efficacy analyses were performed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase I this population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Phase I, had a baseline measurement for Phase I and had at least 1 measurement after the start of study drug provided during Phase I.
hs-CRP measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4. Baseline and post-baseline measurements were log-transformed in the response vector, with fixed effects for treatment, time and the interaction of time by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=117 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=458 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=899 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) (Phase I)
|
-10.5 Percentage Change
Interval -23.0 to 4.0
|
-6.6 Percentage Change
Interval -13.6 to 1.0
|
-9.0 Percentage Change
Interval -14.0 to -3.6
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and Week 12 (end of Phase II)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). For Phase II this population consisted of all randomized participants who completed Phase I and were not adequately controlled at the end of Phase I, received at least 1 dose of study treatment during Phase II, had a baseline measurement for Phase II and had at least 1 measurement after the start of Phase II
hs-CRP measured at Baseline (Week 6; end of Phase 1) and after 6 weeks of study drug administration (Week 12; end of Phase II). Baseline was defined as the average of the values at Visits 5 and 6. Baseline and post-baseline measurements were log-transformed in the response vector, with fixed effects for treatment, time and the interaction of time by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=119 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=121 Participants
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=226 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=200 Participants
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=27 Participants
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Hs-CRP (Phase II)
|
-19.5 Percentage Change
Interval -31.5 to -5.3
|
-6.4 Percentage Change
Interval -20.2 to 9.8
|
-10.9 Percentage Change
Interval -20.9 to 0.3
|
0.7 Percentage Change
Interval -11.2 to 14.2
|
NA Percentage Change
Study plan did not include the calculation of these values
|
Adverse Events
Phase I: Ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + Atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mg
Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mg
Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mg
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Phase I: Ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + Atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mg
n=120 participants at risk
Co-administration of EZ 10 mg tablet + Atorva 10 mg tablet; once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mg
n=480 participants at risk
Atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mg
n=939 participants at risk
Rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
n=28 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I.
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]
n=124 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Atorva 40mg
n=124 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]
n=231 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=205 participants at risk
Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.43%
1/231 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pelvic fracture
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bile duct cancer
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.11%
1/939 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.21%
1/480 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.43%
1/231 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol poisoning
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.43%
1/231 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.43%
1/231 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/231 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.49%
1/205 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.00%
0/120 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/480 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/939 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/28 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/124 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.43%
1/231 • Number of events 1 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/205 • up to 12 weeks
Adverse events were reported using the All Patients as Treated (APaT) Population, which was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The sponsor must have the opportunity to review all proposed abstracts, manuscripts, or presentations regarding this study 60 days prior to submission for publication/presentation. Any information identified by the sponsor as confidential must be deleted prior to submission.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER