Early Detection of Lung Tumors by Sniffer Dogs - Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity
NCT ID: NCT01141842
Last Updated: 2013-05-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
230 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-11-30
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identifying Unique Scent Signature of Lung Cancer Through Body Odor
NCT01527461
Distinction Between Lung Cancer and Gynecological Cancers by Canine Scent Detection
NCT01383408
The Suitability of Sniff Dog as a Tool in Screening Tumors
NCT02049645
Canine-Assisted Profiling of Lung Cancer From Human Breath
NCT02759679
Breath Analysis to Diagnose Lung Cancer
NCT03250390
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Three study groups are defined using the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:
* lung cancer: male \& female, age 18-80, competent, confirmed lung cancer in diagnostic work up and surgery, no history or present other tumor disease
* healthy individual: male \& female, age 18-80, competent, no history or present other tumor disease including lung cancer, no pathological lung function tests
* chronic obstructive lung disease: male \& female, age 18-80, competent, no history or present other tumor disease including lung cancer, pathological lung function tests
For each patient, i) history, ii) present medication, iii) lung function tests are documented. For the lung cancer patients, the tumor stage following surgery is documented.
Five sniffer dogs are trained using BS of lung cancer patients and healthy individuals. After completion of the training the ability of the dogs to differentiate between the groups is tested:
* 5 BS are presented in 1 experiment:
* Test I: lung cancer vs healthy individual
* Test II: lung cancer vs chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* Test III: lung cancer vs healthy individuals \& bronchitis
* for every experiment 1 BS of a lung cancer patient is used
* the lung cancer sample is placed randomly in one of the five test tubes
* the other test tubes are used for BS of healthy individuals or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients or both
* neither the dog handler nor the dog know the loading of the test tubes
* experiments are repeated 5 to 10 times
For analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the dog's reaction is determined.
The patient's medication, smoking habits, age and gender are analysed to rule out confounders or bias.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
lung cancer
breath samples of patients with confirmed lung cancer
exhalation analysis of breath sample
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
underlying lung disease
patients with underlying lung disease and impairment in lung function
exhalation analysis of breath sample
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
healthy individual
healthy individual with no lung disease and no history of cancer including lung cancer
exhalation analysis of breath sample
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
exhalation analysis of breath sample
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
exhalation analysis of breath sample
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
exhalation analysis of breath sample
breath sample is presented to sniffer dog in test tube
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* competent
* confirmed lung cancer
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Schillerhoehe Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thorsten Walles
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thorsten Walles, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Schillerhoehe Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Schillerhoehe Hospital
Gerlingen, , Germany
Praxis Heimann & Ehmann
Stuttgart, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boedeker E, Friedel G, Walles T. Sniffer dogs as part of a bimodal bionic research approach to develop a lung cancer screening. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 May;14(5):511-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr070. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
Ehmann R, Boedeker E, Friedrich U, Sagert J, Dippon J, Friedel G, Walles T. Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon. Eur Respir J. 2012 Mar;39(3):669-76. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00051711. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KSH-TCH-IIT-2010-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.