The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Glucose Metabolism in Non-Diabetic African American Adults

NCT ID: NCT01141192

Last Updated: 2010-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Type 2 diabetes is more common among African Americans than Caucasians. African Americans are also at a higher risk for lower levels of vitamin D compared to other ethnic groups. The investigators don't yet know if there is a connection between not having enough vitamin D and type 2 diabetes in African Americans. Researchers have found that the less vitamin D Caucasians had the higher the chance they would have type 2 diabetes but it is less clear if this is the case for African Americans. The investigators want to better understand how vitamin D status and diabetes risk are linked in African Americans. Also, the investigators want to see if supplementation with vitamin D will improve your blood pressure, blood sugar, \& insulin. All of these are in some way related to diabetes. The investigators want to measure changes in blood sugar \& blood pressure in people who do not have diabetes with the hope of learning new information to help treat those that do have diabetes.

The investigators hypothesize that vitamin D status is related to diabetes risk measured by hemoglobin A1c (a test of glucose level over time), fasting glucose and insulin in non-diabetic African American adults and that body weight status may affect vitamin D status in response to vitamin D supplements compared to placebo.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a 60,000 IU vitamin D3 supplement every four weeks or an inactive placebo. All investigators and the participants will be blinded to the assignment group of each participant until all testing is completed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vitamin D3 supplement

60,000 IU vitamin D3 oral supplement provided every four weeks at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 in the form of one 50,000 and two 5,000 IU vitamin D3 supplements in gelcap form.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

vitamin D3, cholecalciferol

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

1 gelcap of 50,000 IU vitamin D3 plus 2 gelcaps of 5,000 IU vitamin D3 each; a total of 60,000 IU vitamin D3 dosed four weeks apart at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 of the 16 week study.

Sugar Pill

Inactive placebo tablets identical in appearance to the active comparator provided every four weeks at weeks 0,4,8,and 12.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Inactive comparator

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

The inactive comparator dose provided was identical in appearance to the active comparator but contained no vitamin D3

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

vitamin D3, cholecalciferol

1 gelcap of 50,000 IU vitamin D3 plus 2 gelcaps of 5,000 IU vitamin D3 each; a total of 60,000 IU vitamin D3 dosed four weeks apart at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 of the 16 week study.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Inactive comparator

The inactive comparator dose provided was identical in appearance to the active comparator but contained no vitamin D3

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* African American by self-report
* In good health

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of diabetes
* Health problems/medication affecting calcium and/or vitamin D metabolism
* Current use of vitamin/mineral/herbal/nutritional supplements
* Inability to swallow pills
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Augusta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Medical College of Georgia

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yanbin Dong, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Augusta University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical College of Georgia

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liu E, Meigs JB, Pittas AG, McKeown NM, Economos CD, Booth SL, Jacques PF. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin d is associated with markers of the insulin resistant phenotype in nondiabetic adults. J Nutr. 2009 Feb;139(2):329-34. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.093831. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19106328 (View on PubMed)

Pittas AG, Dawson-Hughes B. Vitamin D and diabetes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010 Jul;121(1-2):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.03.042. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20304061 (View on PubMed)

Voidonikola PT, Stamatelopoulos KS, Alevizaki M, Kollias GE, Zakopoulos NA, Lekakis JP, Anastasiou E, Theodorakis MJ, Pittas AG, Papamichael CM. The association between glycemia and endothelial function in nondiabetic individuals: the importance of body weight. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Dec;16(12):2658-62. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.431. Epub 2008 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18846051 (View on PubMed)

Liu E, Meigs JB, Pittas AG, Economos CD, McKeown NM, Booth SL, Jacques PF. Predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D score and incident type 2 diabetes in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jun;91(6):1627-33. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28441. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20392893 (View on PubMed)

Zhu H, Guo D, Li K, Pedersen-White J, Stallmann-Jorgensen IS, Huang Y, Parikh S, Liu K, Dong Y. Increased telomerase activity and vitamin D supplementation in overweight African Americans. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jun;36(6):805-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.197. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21986705 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0910091

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Vitamin C and Cardiovascular Risk
NCT00534014 COMPLETED NA
Chromium and Insulin Resistance
NCT00846248 COMPLETED NA