Objective Evaluation of Patients With Palmar Hyperhidrosis Submitted to Two Levels of Sympathectomy: T3 and T4.

NCT ID: NCT01140659

Last Updated: 2010-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare the results obtained with video-assisted sympathectomy performed in two distinct levels ganglionic (third versus fourth thoracic ganglion) for the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis, through a blind randomized clinical trial using an objective method to measure the sweat before and after the operation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, the treatment of choice for treating palmar hyperhidrosis (PH) is video-assisted thoracic sympathectomy (VATS) . This minimally invasive technique has been well standardized and provides adequate results with low morbidity.

The main side effect of VATS is compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH). This is present in most cases and is considered the greatest cause of dissatisfaction. To reduce the risk of CH, various studies have been conducted to compare different levels of ganglion resection. These studies have been based on subjective quantification of sweating (assessment of sweating reported by patients) and on the application of quality-of-life questionnaires.

Recently, tests for the objective evaluation of sweating have been developed to quantify sweating among patients with various diseases, including PH. So far, there have not been any studies comparing the long-term results of thoracic sympathectomy on the third ganglion (G3) versus the fourth ganglion (G4)with objective evaluation to quantify sweating.

The present study was prospective, randomized and blinded, with the objective of comparing the results from VATS at two different resection levels: G3 versus G4. All the patients were followed over a one-year period, and their palmar sweating was quantified using a portable device (VapoMeter) to measure transepidermal water loss (TEWL). In addition, CH was evaluated by applying a specific quality-of-life questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Objective measurement of sweat

We selected 40 patients from February 2007 to May 2009. All participants were randomized into two groups of 20 patients (G3 and G4) and underwent the sympathectomy, being followed for 12 months. We used an objective method for measuring sweat, checking the "TEWL (transepidermal water loss) measured by the "VapoMeter", and evaluated the quality of life before and after the operation. Also studied were: incidence and intensity of the compensatory hyperhidrosis.

Group Type OTHER

Video-assisted sympathectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All participants were randomized into two groups of 20 patients (G3 and G4) and underwent video-assisted sympathectomy, being followed for 12 months. During this period, the subjects completed a questionnaire about quality of life and carried out the measurements of sweat by VapoMeter.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Video-assisted sympathectomy

All participants were randomized into two groups of 20 patients (G3 and G4) and underwent video-assisted sympathectomy, being followed for 12 months. During this period, the subjects completed a questionnaire about quality of life and carried out the measurements of sweat by VapoMeter.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Thoracic sympathectomy Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being determined to accomplish the procedure, because such a statement depends on the level of discomfort suffered by the patient.
* Absence of previous thoracic surgery.
* Concordance with the completion of informed consent.
* Preoperative normal, including chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, blood count, sodium, potassium, urea, creatinine, glucose and thyroid hormones.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with BMI\> 25.
* Pregnancy.
* Younger than 15 and more than 45 years.
* Heart disease that may contraindicate the procedure (congestive heart failure, coronary insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmias, symptomatic, acute myocardial infarction, etc.).
* Acute infections or chronic.
* Bleeding disorder.
* Neoplasms.
* Inflammatory diseases of pulmonary or pleural.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Faculty of Medicine - University of São Paulo (FMUSP)

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

José Ribas M de Campos

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Thoracic Surgery - University of São Paulo - Medical College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine - University of São Paulo.

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

005/05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.