CopiOs Posterolateral Fusion Procedure

NCT ID: NCT01123850

Last Updated: 2015-05-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare radiographic data collection from patients undergoing instrumented PLF with CopiOs(R) BVF or instrumented PLF with autologous bone and to assess overall clinical outcomes. Patients will serve as self controls.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, counter-balanced study involving 85 subjects at up to 8 investigative centers. Each subject will be an appropriate candidate for an instrumented PLF and will meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All subjects will undergo an instrumented, pedicle screw PLF procedure. Autograft or other interbody devices identified by the surgeon to be in the best interest of the patient may be used. Enrolled patients will receive CopiOs BVF sponge soaked with bone marrow aspirate on one side and autologous bone on the other side. All patients will receive both CopiOs BVF and autologous bone. Patients will serve as self-controls in this counter-balanced study. Data will be collected pre-operatively, operatively and post-operatively at six and twelve months.

The study objectives include: Radiographic success of CopiOs is non-inferior to autograft with clear evidence of bridging bone. Radiographic analysis will be used to show that CopiOs works as well as autograft when comparing the rate of fusion at 6 and 12 months. The CT scan (12 month) will show that CopiOs works as well as autograft when comparing the fusion mass between the transverse processes. Additionally, clinical success will be determined by an improvement of 15 percentage points using the Oswestry Disability Index and maintenance or improvement in the motor and sensory components of the neurological assessment from preoperative to postoperative. Since patients serve as self-controls there will be no clinical success comparisons between the groups. Rather, clinical success will be measured on overall improvement based on patient outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spondylolisthesis Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single ARM - Copios Bone Filler

All subjects will undergo an instrumented, pedicle screw PLF procedure. Autograft or other interbody devices identified by the surgeon to be in the best interest of the patient may be used. Enrolled patients will receive CopiOs BVF sponge soaked with bone marrow aspirate on one side and autologous bone on the other side. All patients will receive both CopiOs BVF and autologous bone. Patients will serve as self-controls in this counter-balanced study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Copios

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bone Void Filler

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Copios

Bone Void Filler

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient must be skeletally mature; between the ages of 21 and 75
* Patients having degenerative spondylolisthesis, stenosis with instability, or degenerative disc disease as diagnosed by radicular signs and/or imaging studies
* Patients will be medically indicated for a single-level, instrumented PLF between L2 and S1 per their surgeon
* Patient must be willing and able to comply with study requirements, including all necessary study related paperwork and follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of iliac crest bone graft;
* Any previous lumbar spinal surgeries at indicated level;
* Any medical or physical condition that would preclude the potential benefit of spinal surgery;
* Use of a dynamic stabilization systems;
* Sites where stresses on void will exceed the load strength of fixation of hardware;
* Segmental defects;
* Significantly impaired vascularity proximal to the surgical site;
* Sites in direct contact with articular space;
* Soft tissue deficit not allowing closure;
* Active systemic or local infection;
* Severe degenerative bone disease;
* Patients with osteoporosis who are actively under treatment;
* Extreme obesity, as defined by NIH Clinical Guidelines Body Mass Index (BMI\>40 kg/m2);
* Active malignancy;
* Patients with a history of multiple allergies;
* Patients with known allergies to bovine collagen;
* Hypercalcemia;
* Pregnancy;
* Mental illness;
* Alcohol or drug abuse;
* Incarceration.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zimmer Biomet

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Neurological Surgery of Southern Illinois

Belleville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana Orthopedic Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Las Cruces Orthopaedic Associates

Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Upstate Bone and Joint Center

East Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Scott and White Healthcare

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF
NCT05691062 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
LUMBAR & SACROILIAC FUSION STUDY
NCT07204288 RECRUITING NA