Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
298 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-05-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
HCR vs. CABG Study
NCT02892474
Comparison of One-stop Hybrid Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Multi-vessel Disease
NCT01035034
The Ideal Sequence of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization with Endoscopic Coronary Revascularization
NCT05184075
Prospective Evaluation for Hybrid Cardiac Procedures
NCT05143671
Safety and Efficacy Continued Access Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in Very High Risk Subjects and High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT01531374
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR) (the intended combination of CABG and PCI) as a scientifically validated approach would have a major healthcare impact. The ability to deliver a new therapy for CAD that provides durability, but without the obligatory trauma and prolonged recovery time characteristic of conventional CABG would be a major advance in the field of cardiovascular medicine. Candidates in whom HCR would be particularly advantageous would be several subgroups of CAD patients that are increasing in numbers: the elderly, patients with a high predicted risk of mortality and/or morbidity for CABG, deconditioned patients or patients with significant disabilities and patients in whom treatment durability is important, but a significantly invasive approach is not an option. Moreover, HCR is likely to bridge the divide in treatment philosophies and approaches that exist between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. Collaboration rather than competition between these specialties will ultimately benefit patients, hospitals, payers and healthcare providers. The Hybrid Revascularization Observational Study is a multi-center observational study planning grant which will explore target populations for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR), their outcomes, and variations in specific ways these patients are managed, in order to inform the design of a pivotal comparative effectiveness trial of this emerging therapeutic strategy.
Given the observational nature of the study, the HCR and PCI groups' baseline characteristics and event rates are not directly comparable; rather, the results were intended to inform the design of a larger, randomized pivotal trial. The study was designed in two phases: Cohort 1, which captured demographic, angiographic, and practice patterns data for 6,669 consecutively screened patients; and Cohort 2 which captured demographic, angiographic, practice patterns, and outcome data for 298 patients who underwent either HCR or PCI with DES (90 of whom were also part of Cohort 1).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Angiogram Review Group
All consecutive and consenting patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization in a 3 month period
No interventions assigned to this group
Therapeutic Intervention Group
* Cohort 2 Therapeutic Intervention Group - HCR Patients (including those from the angiogram review group) who undergo Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) with minimally invasive LIMA-LAD CABG, OR
* Cohort 2 Therapeutic Intervention Group - PCI Patients (including those from the angiogram review group) who meet the proposed anatomic and clinical eligibility criteria and undergo multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug Eluting Stents
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 years or older
* Clinical indication for revascularization
* LAD and at least one additional vessel coronary disease (\> 70% stenosis) confirmed by angiogram
* Clinical characteristics and multi-vessel disease amenable to both PCI with DES and Hybrid as adjudicated by one interventional cardiologist and one cardiac surgeon
* Ability to tolerate and no plans to interrupt double platelet therapy for ≥ 12 months
* Ability to tolerate to single lung ventilation in the judgment of the investigator
* Willing to comply with all protocol required follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* 1 month prior to enrollment for bare metal stent (BMS) or
* 6 months prior to enrollment for DES
* Evidence of in stent restenosis of a DES or BMS
* Previous cardiac surgery of any kind
* Chronic total occlusion (CTO) in LAD or ≥ 2 CTOs in major coronary territories that are considered targets for revascularization
* Left main disease ≥ 50% stenosis
* Presence of fresh coronary thrombus
* Need for concomitant vascular or other cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization (including, but not limited to, valve surgery, aortic resection, left ventricular aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, etc)
* Previous STEMI within 30 days prior to randomization
* Previous stroke within 6 months prior to randomization
* Previous thoracic surgery involving the left pleural space
* Acute decompensated heart failure within 30 days prior to randomization
* Ejection fraction \< 30%
* Creatinine clearance ≤ 50 ml/min within 24 hours prior to randomization
* Hemodynamic instability at time of screening
* Body mass index \> 40
* Extra-cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 3 years
* Participation or planned participation in another investigational intervention study within 60 days prior to randomization
* Unable to give informed consent or potential for noncompliance with the study protocol due to psychiatric illness, organic brain disease, dementia, current alcohol abuse, mental retardation, language barrier, or geographical inaccessibility;
* Pregnancy at time of screening or intention to become pregnant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research
OTHER
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Puskas, MD, MSc, FACS, FACC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Deborah Ascheim, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Data Coordinating Center)
Joseph J DeRose, MD, FACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Montefiore Medical Center
Michael Argenziano, MD, FACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Mathew Williams, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
John G. Byrne, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Lankenau Hospital
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of Virginia Health Systems
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Puskas JD, Halkos ME, DeRose JJ, Bagiella E, Miller MA, Overbey J, Bonatti J, Srinivas VS, Vesely M, Sutter F, Lynch J, Kirkwood K, Shapiro TA, Boudoulas KD, Crestanello J, Gehrig T, Smith P, Ragosta M, Hoff SJ, Zhao D, Gelijns AC, Szeto WY, Weisz G, Argenziano M, Vassiliades T, Liberman H, Matthai W, Ascheim DD. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 26;68(4):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.032.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GCO 09-0657
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.