Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-08-31
2006-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Devices used to facilitate mucus mobilization have been target of several controversies and mainly a few scientific studies that endorse the use of those equipments. According to the principle of acapella® device, it should be used concomitant with nebulization aiming to optimize its performance in bronchial hygiene.
Aims: To assess the effect of acapella® device application in the radioaerosol regional pulmonary deposition through pulmonary scintigraphy in normal subjects.
Materials and method: 10 health individuals, males and mean age of 24,4 ± 2,2 years participated in this study during the three phases of this research: 1st phase were done with nebulization through acapella® device, attached in the final branch according to manufacturer recommendation; in 2nd phase a ¨T¨tube connector were adapted, being nebulizer attached to the mouthpiece and in 3rd phase nebulization were performance through the mouthpiece as routinely used in aerosoltherapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Activity of Inspiratory Muscles With the Use of Positive Pressure in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT01111487
Acute Effects After Stretching Respiratory Muscles on Ventilatory Pattern and Volume Distribution of Chest Wall
NCT02416349
Respiratory Exercises Versus Manual Therapy and Respiratory Exercises in Moderate Smokers
NCT02514161
New Intervention Protocol With Inspirometer Versus 2 Modalities of Pulmonary Intervention: INSPUL-REHAB
NCT04270162
Respiratory Muscles After Inspiratory Muscle Training After COVID-19
NCT05582642
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acapella with nebulization
1. st Phase In this phase the jet nebulizer was connected to the branch end of the Acapella according to manufacturer's recommendations.
The volunteer did the radio-aerosol inhalation to obtain images of the lung fields scintigraphy static during the period of 300 seconds using an array of at 256x256x16 incidence later, as that encompasses most incidence of lung volume.
2. nd Phase The experimental procedure of this phase was similar to the 1st stage, but what differed was it made an adjustment by placing a pipe "T" between the mouthpiece and the device Acapella so that the aerosol would be inhaled not pass through the device.
Stage 3 This stage was considered phase control since the aerosol inhalation was performed through the mouthpiece connected directly to the nebulizer as is routinely used in clinical practice as illustrated. The procedure of this phase followed the same protocol of previous phases.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Performed spirometry
* According to the criteria of the Guidelines for Pulmonary Function-2002 published by the official organ of the Brazilian Society of Thoracic
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological diseases and body temperature greater than 37 º C during the initial evaluation and during intervention
* Respiratory rate (RR) greater than 35ipm.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Franca EE, Dornelas de Andrade AF, Cabral G, Almeida Filho P, Silva KC, Galindo Filho VC, Marinho PE, Lemos A, Parreira VF. Nebulization associated with bi-level noninvasive ventilation: analysis of pulmonary radioaerosol deposition. Respir Med. 2006 Apr;100(4):721-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Aug 31.
Volsko TA, DiFiore J, Chatburn RL. Performance comparison of two oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices: Acapella versus Flutter. Respir Care. 2003 Feb;48(2):124-30.
Mesquita FO, Galindo-Filho VC, Neto JL, Galvao AM, Brandao SC, Fink JB, Dornelas-de-Andrade A. Scintigraphic assessment of radio-aerosol pulmonary deposition with the acapella positive expiratory pressure device and various nebulizer configurations. Respir Care. 2014 Mar;59(3):328-33. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02291. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
fabricio 01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.