Respiratory Mechanics Effects of Flutter Valve in Bronchiectasis Patients
NCT ID: NCT00656721
Last Updated: 2015-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2006-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis
NCT03737630
Inspiratory Muscle Training for Breathless Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Heart Failure
NCT02579200
Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training by Spirotiger in Chronic Patients
NCT01556139
Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Advanced Lung Disease
NCT03511287
High-intensity vs. Low-intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT03247361
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The effects of the Flutter Valve on respiratory mechanics of patients with bronchiectasis have been evaluated by forced spirometry (Pryor e cols, 1994; Gondor e cols, 1999; Thompson e cols, 2002). This approach however, does not allow the characterization of mucus transportation along the airways (Williams, 1994). The forced oscillation technique (FOT), a non-invasive alternative to characterize respiratory mechanics, allows the evaluation of respiratory mechanics at different frequencies without special maneuvers (Dubois e cols., 1956). According to eligibility criteria and in a randomized order, the patients were submitted to two protocols (control and Flutter Valve intervention), with one-week interval between them (washout). Respiratory mechanics and expectorated sputum volume were assessed before and after each intervention, in order to assess the Flutter Valve effect on tracheobronchial sputum removal.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Flutter Valve
This a crossover study, so all subjects performed both, control and experimental interventions. In Flutter Valve intervention the subjects remained comfortably seated, breathing through the device for 15 minutes, starting off from the total pulmonary capacity, and being free to cough. Thereafter, a 5-min session of cough ensued. In the control intervention the subjects followed the same sequence of the Flutter Valve intervention, but the metallic sphere and the cover of the device were removed. Since the patients were not acquainted with the valve, they did not know its proper assembly. As in the Flutter Valve intervention, during 15 minutes the patients could expectorate spontaneously and return to the device. A 5-min coughing session took place.
Flutter Valve
Flutter Valve (Scandipharm, Birmingham, AL) is shaped like a pipe with a hardened plastic mouthpiece at one end, a plastic protective, perforated cover at the other end, and a high-density stainless steel ball resting in a plastic circular cone on the inside. When the patient expires, a vibratory effect is transmitted to airways by the steel ball oscillation in order to facilitate mucociliary clearance.
In our study, the use of the equipment was guided by a registered physical therapist, but the position (angle) was determined by the patient, according to his/her adaptation and perception of effectiveness of sputum clearance. The patients remained comfortably seated, breathing through the device for 15 minutes, starting from the total pulmonary capacity, and being free to cough. Thereafter, a 5-minute session of cough was done.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Flutter Valve
Flutter Valve (Scandipharm, Birmingham, AL) is shaped like a pipe with a hardened plastic mouthpiece at one end, a plastic protective, perforated cover at the other end, and a high-density stainless steel ball resting in a plastic circular cone on the inside. When the patient expires, a vibratory effect is transmitted to airways by the steel ball oscillation in order to facilitate mucociliary clearance.
In our study, the use of the equipment was guided by a registered physical therapist, but the position (angle) was determined by the patient, according to his/her adaptation and perception of effectiveness of sputum clearance. The patients remained comfortably seated, breathing through the device for 15 minutes, starting from the total pulmonary capacity, and being free to cough. Thereafter, a 5-minute session of cough was done.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* acute hemoptysis,
* recent history of rib fracture or pneumothorax (less than 1 year),
* respiratory infection in the four weeks before measurements,
* asthma,
* cystic fibrosis,
* daily sputum production lower than 25 mL/day
28 Years
92 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
OTHER_GOV
Rio de Janeiro State Research Supporting Foundation (FAPERJ)
OTHER_GOV
Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
OTHER
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fernando Silva Guimaraes
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fernando S Guimarães, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
002434-UFRJ
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.