Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Axial Spondyloarthritis

NCT ID: NCT01087762

Last Updated: 2018-08-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

325 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in subjects with active axial Spondyloarthritis (axial SpA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spondyloarthropathies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CZP 200 mg Q2W

Subjects received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneous (sc) on Weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP sc every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 6 onwards.

At every visit, subjects received one injection of 200 mg CZP and one injection of Placebo to maintain the study blind.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CZP 200 mg Q2W

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

CZP 400 mg Q4W

Subjects received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneous (sc) on Weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by 400 mg CZP sc every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 8 onwards.

Subjects received 2 injections of Placebo every 4 weeks in between the 2 injections of 200 mg CZP to maintain the study blind.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CZP 400 mg Q4W

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Placebo

Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 24. Placebo subjects who did not achieve certain predefined response criteria at both Weeks 14 and 16 left the Placebo group on Week 16.

After 24 weeks, all subjects were randomized to active treatment with CZP 200 mg Q2W or CZP 400 mg Q4W.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Placebo to CZP 200 mg escape on Week 16

Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 16. Subjects who did not achieve certain predefined response criteria at both Weeks 14 and 16 left the Placebo group on Week 16 and were treated with three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc on Weeks 16, 18 and 20, followed by 200 mg CZP sc every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 22 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.

Group Type OTHER

CZP 200 mg Q2W

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Placebo to CZP 400 mg escape on Week 16

Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 16. Subjects who did not achieve certain predefined response criteria at both Weeks 14 and 16 left the Placebo group on Week 16 and were treated with three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc on Weeks 16, 18 and 20, followed by 400 mg CZP sc every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 24 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.

Group Type OTHER

CZP 400 mg Q4W

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Placebo to CZP 200 mg on Week 24

Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 24. Three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc were given on Weeks 24, 26 and 28, followed by 200 mg CZP sc every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 30 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.

Group Type OTHER

CZP 200 mg Q2W

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Placebo to CZP 400 mg on Week 24

Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 24. Three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc were given on Weeks 24, 26 and 28, followed by 400 mg CZP sc every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 32 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.

Group Type OTHER

CZP 400 mg Q4W

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CZP 200 mg Q2W

200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

CZP 400 mg Q4W

400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cimzia CZP Certolizumab Pegol Cimzia CZP Certolizumab Pegol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Documented diagnosis of adult-onset axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA) of at least 3 months' duration as defined by the specified Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria
* Active disease as defined by:

* Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4
* Back pain ≥ 4 on a 0 to 10 Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NRS) (from BASDAI item 2)
* C-Reactive Protein (CRP) \> ULN (Upper Limit of Normal) and/or current evidence (ie, within the last 3 months from Screening) for Sacroiliitis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as defined by Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria
* Intolerance to or inadequate response to at least 1 Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID)

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of total Spinal Ankylosis ("bamboo spine")
* Diagnosis of any other Inflammatory Arthritis
* Prior treatment with any experimental biological agents for treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA)
* Exposure to more than 1 TNF-antagonist or to more than 2 previous biological agents for Axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA)
* History of or current chronic or recurrent infections
* High risk of infection
* Recent live vaccination
* Concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy
* Class III or IV congestive heart failure - New York Heart Association (NYHA)
* Demyelinating disease of the central nervous system
* Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study or within 3 months following the last dose of the investigational product
* Subjects with any other condition which, in the investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

+1 877 822 9493 UCB

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

961

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

953

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

954

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

971

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

987

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

974

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

973

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

966

Palm Desert, California, United States

Site Status

952

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

957

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

962

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

959

Orange Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

990

Pinellas Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

958

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

964

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

969

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

984

Flowood, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

965

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Site Status

950

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

985

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

963

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

977

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

951

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

970

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

982

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

972

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

975

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

978

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

983

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

967

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

981

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

968

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

700

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

701

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

704

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

705

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

709

La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

706

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

710

San Juan, , Argentina

Site Status

702

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

708

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

153

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

152

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

151

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

760

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

750

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

761

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

756

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

907

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

903

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

900

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

910

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

902

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

504

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

501

Hlučín, , Czechia

Site Status

500

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

502

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

505

Terezín, , Czechia

Site Status

503

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

200

Boulogne-Billan Court, , France

Site Status

201

Lille, , France

Site Status

205

Limoges, , France

Site Status

206

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

204

Paris, , France

Site Status

202

Tours, , France

Site Status

257

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

258

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

255

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

254

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

250

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

253

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

260

München, , Germany

Site Status

263

München, , Germany

Site Status

256

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

303

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

305

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

302

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

306

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

300

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

352

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

351

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

350

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

802

Cuernavaca, , Mexico

Site Status

801

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

401

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

400

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

458

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

452

Dąbrówka, , Poland

Site Status

455

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

459

Gdanks, , Poland

Site Status

457

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

450

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

454

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

453

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

456

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

462

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

550

Mérida, , Spain

Site Status

554

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

552

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

553

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

605

Barnsley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

600

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

602

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

601

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Belgium Brazil Canada Czechia France Germany Hungary Italy Mexico Netherlands Poland Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Landewe R, Braun J, Deodhar A, Dougados M, Maksymowych WP, Mease PJ, Reveille JD, Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Stach C, Hoepken B, Fichtner A, Coteur G, de Longueville M, Sieper J. Efficacy of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms of axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis: 24-week results of a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled Phase 3 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):39-47. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204231. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24013647 (View on PubMed)

Proft F, Vahldiek JL, Nicolaes J, Tham R, Hoepken B, Ufuktepe B, Poddubnyy D, Bressem KK. Machine learning vs human experts: sacroiliitis analysis from the RAPID-axSpA and C-OPTIMISE phase 3 axSpA trials. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2025 Apr 18;9(2):rkae118. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkae118. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40256636 (View on PubMed)

Rudwaleit M, Marzo-Ortega H, Navarro-Compan V, Tham R, Kumke T, Bauer L, de Peyrecave N, Kim M, Van den Bosch F. Exploratory analysis of the potential disconnect between objective inflammatory response and clinical response following certolizumab pegol treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):e004369. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004369.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39209369 (View on PubMed)

Baraliakos X, Kruse S, Auteri SE, de Peyrecave N, Nurminen T, Kumke T, Hoepken B, Braun J. Certolizumab pegol treatment in axial spondyloarthritis mitigates fat lesion development: 4-year post-hoc MRI results from a phase 3 study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Jul 6;61(7):2875-2885. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab841.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34791107 (View on PubMed)

Landewe R, Nurminen T, Davies O, Baeten D. A single determination of C-reactive protein does not suffice to declare a patient with a diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis 'CRP-negative'. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Sep 14;20(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1707-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30217232 (View on PubMed)

van der Heijde D, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Purcaru O, Kavanaugh AF. Improvements in workplace and household productivity with certolizumab pegol treatment in axial spondyloarthritis: results to week 96 of a phase III study. RMD Open. 2018 Apr 9;4(1):e000659. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000659. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29670761 (View on PubMed)

van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, Hermann KA, Landewe RBM, Machado PM, Maksymowych WP, Davies OR, de Peyrecave N, Hoepken B, Bauer L, Nurminen T, Braun J. Limited radiographic progression and sustained reductions in MRI inflammation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 4-year imaging outcomes from the RAPID-axSpA phase III randomised trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):699-705. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212377. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29343510 (View on PubMed)

Braun J, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Landewe R, Machado PM, Maksymowych WP, Davies O, Hoepken B, Nurminen T, Stach C, van der Heijde D. Effect of certolizumab pegol over 96 weeks of treatment on inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joints, as measured by MRI, and the association between clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2017 Apr 24;3(1):e000430. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000430. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28848654 (View on PubMed)

van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Landewe R, Sieper J, Maksymowych WP, Rudwaleit M, Van den Bosch F, Braun J, Mease PJ, Kivitz AJ, Walsh J, Davies O, Bauer L, Hoepken B, Peterson L, Deodhar A. Sustained efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of certolizumab pegol in axial spondyloarthritis: 4-year outcomes from RAPID-axSpA. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Sep 1;56(9):1498-1509. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex174.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28498975 (View on PubMed)

van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Fleischmann R, Mease PJ, Rudwaleit M, Nurminen T, Davies O. Early Disease Activity or Clinical Response as Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes With Certolizumab Pegol in Axial Spondyloarthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jul;69(7):1030-1039. doi: 10.1002/acr.23092. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27696727 (View on PubMed)

Rudwaleit M, Rosenbaum JT, Landewe R, Marzo-Ortega H, Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Davies O, Bartz H, Hoepken B, Nurminen T, Deodhar A. Observed Incidence of Uveitis Following Certolizumab Pegol Treatment in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jun;68(6):838-44. doi: 10.1002/acr.22848.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26815944 (View on PubMed)

Sieper J, Kivitz A, van Tubergen A, Deodhar A, Coteur G, Woltering F, Landewe R. Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Oct;67(10):1475-80. doi: 10.1002/acr.22594.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25832312 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-011719-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AS001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy and Safety Study of SUNPG1622
NCT02980705 TERMINATED PHASE2