Focused Ultrasound Surgery in the Treatment of Pain Resulting From Metastatic Bone Tumors With the ExAblate 2100 Conformal Bone System
NCT ID: NCT01085565
Last Updated: 2016-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ExAblate Conformal Bone System Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain
NCT00981578
Combination Chemotherapy and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Multiple Myeloma
NCT00004903
Salvage Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Cancer That Has Progressed After Systemic Immunotherapy
NCT02710253
A Trial of Surgery and Fractionated Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Ependymoma
NCT02125786
Trial for Salvage Re-Irradiation of Metastatic Spine Lesions Using Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery
NCT02278744
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are primarily palliative and include localized therapies (radiation and surgery), systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiopharmaceutical, and bisphosphonates although the primary goal of the use of these therapies are often to address the disease itself), and analgesics (opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Recently, radiofrequency ablation has been tested as a treatment option for bone metastases \[8\]. Currently, an off label use of Cryoablation techniques are being tested as another alternative for bone Mets palliation. The main goals of these treatments are improvement of quality of life and functional level. These goals can be further described:
1. Pain relief
2. Preservation and restoration of function
3. Local tumor control
4. Skeletal stabilization
Treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care for patients with localized bone pain, and results in the palliation of pain for many of these patients. Twenty to 30% of patients treated with radiation therapy do not experience pain relief \[9-13\]. Re-treatment rates are generally reported in the range of 10-25%. Many patients with relapsed pain or poor response to initial radiation may be lost to follow up or may not be referred back to oncologists for consideration of re-radiation. In addition to relapse and re-treatment, there is an increased risk of pathologic fracture in the peri-radiation period. The fracture rate reported in radiation studies is generally in the range of 1% to 8%. The hyperemic response weakens the adjacent bone and increases the risk of spontaneous fracture. Furthermore, patients who have recurrent pain at a site previously irradiated may not be eligible for further radiation therapy secondary to limitations in normal tissue tolerance. Hesitation on the part of physicians to use a larger dose may be related to increased long-term toxicity. Larger radiation dose produces a greater risk of complications such as fibrosis of normal soft tissue, which can cause a decrement in the quality of life in cases of life expectancy longer than 6 months. There may also be a greater incidence of acute side effects of nausea and vomiting if the treatment field includes the stomach. The percent of patients experiencing vomiting following EBRT ranges from about 5% to 30%.
A palliative treatment for painful bone metastases that is non-invasive, without long-term toxicity and having minimal complications would be a useful tool for treating physicians and also a beneficial option for patients suffering from painful bone metastases. Results of preliminary studies indicate that ExAblate treatment of painful bone metastases may be a beneficial treatment option \[14, 15\]. The ExAblate system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device used in the coagulation of various types of soft tissue. The ExAblate system has the potential to achieve the first three of the four previously mentioned goals in the treatment of bone tumors; namely pain relief, preservation and restoration of functional levels and local tumor control \[11\]. The ExAblate system used in the present study is a technological advance over the ExAblate 2000 fixed transducer system in terms of flexibility of use and reduction of positioning related pain to the patients. The ExAblate system used in this study conforms to the patient's body shape at the location of the bone mets location
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exablate treatment
ExAblate 2100
Conformal Bone System
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ExAblate 2100
Conformal Bone System
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
3. Patients who are suffering from symptoms of bone metastases
4. Targeted tumor(s) are ExAblate device accessible and are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5)
5. Patient with NRS (0-10 scale) pain score ≥ 4 at the targeted tumors irrespective of medication.
6. Patient who's targeted tumors are on bone and bone-lesion interface is more than 1cm from the skin, major nerve or hollow viscera.
7. Targeted tumors clearly visible by non-contrast MRI, and ExAblate MRgFUS device accessible
8. Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate MRgFUS treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* Need surgical stabilization of the affected weight bearing bony structure OR
* Targeted tumor is at an impending fracture site of the weigh bearing bone. OR
* Patients with surgical stabilization of tumor site with metallic hardware
2. Target tumors-bone interface is less then 1cm from nerve bundles, bowels, skin or bladder.
3. Targeted (most painful) tumors:
* NOT visible by non-contrast MRI, OR
* NOT accessible to ExAblate device
4. Targeted tumor is in the skull
5. Patients on dialysis
6. Patients with life expectancy \< 6-Months
7. Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g., pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study.
8. Subjects with Patients with unstable cardiac status including:
* Unstable angina pectoris on medication
* Patients with documented myocardial infarction less than 40 days prior to protocol enrolment
* Subjects with Severe Congestive Heart Failure, NYHA class 4.
* Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs or with uncontrolled and/or untreated arrhythmia status
9. Severe cerebrovascular disease (CVA within last 6 months)
10. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP \> 100 on medication)
11. Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
12. Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist) including advanced kidney disease
13. Patients with an active infection or severe hematological, neurological, or other uncontrolled disease.
14. KPS Score \< 60 (See "Definitions" below)
15. Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
16. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 2 hrs.)
17. Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial for the palliation of their targeted bone metastasis tumors in the last 30 days
18. Patients receiving new chemotherapy regime or radiation to the targeted lesion (s) within the last two weeks
19. Patients with persistent undistinguishable pain (pain source unidentifiable)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
InSightec
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sheba MC
Ramat Gan, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Sponsor's website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BM011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.