ExAblate Conformal Bone System Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors for the Palliation of Pain

NCT ID: NCT00981578

Last Updated: 2020-03-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-11-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A study to evaluate the safety and initial effectiveness of the ExAblate 2100 Conformal Bone System in the treatment of pain resulting from metastatic bone tumors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bone is the third most common organ involved by metastatic disease behind lung and liver \[6\]. In breast cancer, bone is the second most common site of metastatic spread, and 90% of patients dying of breast cancer have bone metastasis. Breast and prostate cancer metastasize to bone most frequently, which reflects the high incidence of both these tumors, as well as their prolonged clinical courses. Post-cancer survival has increased with improvement in early detection and treatments. As a consequence, the number of patients developing metastatic bone disease during their lifetime has also increased.

Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are primarily palliative and include localized therapies (radiation and surgery), systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiopharmaceutical, and bisphosphonates although the primary goal of the use of these therapies are often to address the disease itself), and analgesics (opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Recently, radiofrequency ablation has been tested as a treatment option for bone metastases \[8\]. Currently, an off label use of Cryoablation techniques are being tested as another alternative for bone Mets palliation. The main goals of these treatments are improvement of quality of life and functional level. These goals can be further described:

1. Pain relief
2. Preservation and restoration of function
3. Local tumor control
4. Skeletal stabilization

Treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care for patients with localized bone pain, and results in the palliation of pain for many of these patients. Twenty to 30% of patients treated with radiation therapy do not experience pain relief \[9-13\]. Re-treatment rates are generally reported in the range of 10-25%. Many patients with relapsed pain or poor response to initial radiation may be lost to follow up or may not be referred back to oncologists for consideration of re-radiation. In addition to relapse and re-treatment, there is an increased risk of pathologic fracture in the peri-radiation period. The fracture rate reported in radiation studies is generally in the range of 1% to 8%. The hyperemic response weakens the adjacent bone and increases the risk of spontaneous fracture. Furthermore, patients who have recurrent pain at a site previously irradiated may not be eligible for further radiation therapy secondary to limitations in normal tissue tolerance. Hesitation on the part of physicians to use a larger dose may be related to increased long-term toxicity. Larger radiation dose produces a greater risk of complications such as fibrosis of normal soft tissue, which can cause a decrement in the quality of life in cases of life expectancy longer than 6 months. There may also be a greater incidence of acute side effects of nausea and vomiting if the treatment field includes the stomach. The percent of patients experiencing vomiting following EBRT ranges from about 5% to 30%.

A palliative treatment for painful bone metastases that is non-invasive, without long-term toxicity and having minimal complications would be a useful tool for treating physicians and also a beneficial option for patients suffering from painful bone metastases. Results of preliminary studies indicate that ExAblate treatment of painful bone metastases may be a beneficial treatment option \[14, 15\]. The ExAblate system is a non-invasive thermal ablation device used in the coagulation of various types of soft tissue. The ExAblate system has the potential to achieve the first three of the four previously mentioned goals in the treatment of bone tumors; namely pain relief, preservation and restoration of functional levels and local tumor control \[11\]. The ExAblate system used in the present study is a technological advance over the ExAblate 2000 fixed transducer system in terms of flexibility of use and reduction of positioning related pain to the patients. The ExAblate system used in this study conforms to the patient's body shape at the location of the bone mets location.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Metastases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ExAblate 2100 Treatment

ExAblate 2100 ablation for the treatment of painful bone metastases.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ExAblate 2100

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conformal Bone System

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ExAblate 2100

Conformal Bone System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Focused ultrasound ablation, MRgFUS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women age 18 and older
2. Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
3. Patients who are suffering from symptoms of bone metastases
4. One to 3 painful lesions.
5. Targeted tumor(s) are ExAblate device accessible and are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5)
6. Patients with persistent distinguishable pain associated with up to 3 tumors of which a maximum of 2 tumors will be treated:

o If patient has pain from additional sites that are not planned for treatment, the pain from the additional sites must be evaluated as being less intense by at least 2 points on the NRS compared to the site(s) to be treated.
7. Patient with NRS (0-10 scale) pain score ≥ 4 at the targeted tumors (i.e: both tumors targeted for treatment must have NRS ≥ 4) irrespective of medication
8. Targeted tumors (most painful) size up to 8 cm in diameter
9. Patient whose targeted (most painful) tumors are on bone and bone-lesion interface is deeper than 1cm from the skin.
10. Targeted (most painful) tumors clearly visible by non-contrast MRI, and ExAblate MRgFUS device accessible
11. Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate MRgFUS treatment
12. At least 2 weeks since chemotherapy
13. No radiation therapy to targeted (most painful) tumors in the past two weeks

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who either

* Need surgical stabilization of the affected weight bearing bony structure (\>7 fracture risk score, see Section 6.9) OR
* Targeted tumor is at an impending fracture site of the weigh bearing bone (\>7 on fracture risk score, see Section 6.9).

OR

o Patients with surgical stabilization of tumor site with metallic hardware
2. More than 3 painful lesions or more than 2 requiring immediate localized treatment
3. The targeted tumor(s) is (are) less than 2 points more painful compared to other non-targeted painful lesions on the site specific NRS.
4. Targeted tumor is in the skull
5. Patients on dialysis
6. Patients with life expectancy \< 6-Months
7. Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g., pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study.
8. Patients with unstable cardiac status including:

* Unstable angina pectoris on medication
* Patients with documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry
* Congestive heart failure requiring medication (other than diuretic)
* Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs
9. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP \> 100 on medication)
10. Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
11. Patients with an active infection or severe hematological, neurological, or other uncontrolled disease.
12. Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist) including advanced kidney disease
13. KPS Score \< 60 (See "Definitions" below)
14. Severe cerebrovascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months)
15. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (can be up to 4 hrs of total table time.)
16. Target (most painful) tumor-bone interface is less then 1cm from nerve bundles, bowels or bladder.
17. Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial for the palliation of their targeted bone metastasis tumors in the last 30 days
18. Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation (i.e., to the targeted lesion (s)) within the last two weeks
19. Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
20. Patients with persistent undistinguishable pain (pain source unidentifiable)
21. Targeted (most painful) tumors size \> 8 cm in diameter
22. Targeted (most painful) tumors:

* NOT visible by non-contrast MRI, OR
* NOT accessible to ExAblate device
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

InSightec

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

City of Hope

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

University of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.insightec.com

Sponsor's web page

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BM010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.