Local Anesthesia Versus Saline Serum in Surgical Incision of Colorectal or Hepatic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT01075646
Last Updated: 2017-03-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
225 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intraperitoneal Local Anaesthetic in Bowel Surgery
NCT02449720
Impact of Intraoperative Deep Neuromuscular Blockade on NOL-guided Opioid Requirement in LSC Colorectal Surgeries
NCT03910998
Local Anesthetic Continuous Preperitoneal Infiltration and Wound Hyperalgesia
NCT01077752
Local Infiltration Analgesia With Ropivacaine Versus Placebo in Vaginal Hysterectomy: a Randomized, Double-Blind Study
NCT00768456
Continuous Preperitoneal Infusion of Ropivacaine After Open Liver Resection: Effect on Post-operative Recovery and Morbidity.
NCT01890408
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although opiates are very potent analgesics they also produce side effects and numerous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in morbidity when patients received lower dose of opiates during anesthesia and in postoperative period. Continuous infusion of local anesthetics in the surgical wound has been used for pain control in different types of surgeries. However, controversial reports has been reported in abdominal surgery.
We are conducting prospective, randomised and double-blind placebo control trials in two surgical models (colo-rectal oncologic surgery and hepatic resection) using continuous perfusion of ropivacaine 0.38% in the surgical wound versus saline.
Anesthetic protocol is the same for all patients.
Patients undergoing colo-rectal surgery can be operated either in laparotomy or laparoscopic technique therefore patients are stratified into four groups once surgical closure has begun:
* Group A1 ropivacaine and laparotomy
* Group A2 ropivacaine and laparoscopy
* Group B1 saline and laparotomy
* Group B2 saline and laparoscopy
In the preanesthesia visit patients who match inclusion criteria are invited to participate in the study and they signed the informed consent. When the patient is in the theatre a nurse not involved in the management of patients opens a closed envelope which indicates the solution to be prepared according to the assigned group.
The surgeon inserts a multiperforated catheter at the subfascial level of surgical wound , just below the suture of the muscular fascia (between the peritoneum and the muscular fascia) and after that surgeons finish the subcutaneous plane and the skin. After the closure a bolus of 5 ml (laparoscopy colon surgery)or 10 ml (laparotomy colon and hepatic surgery) of the solution is given through the catheter and subsequently an elastomer filled with ropivacaine or saline is connected. The catheter is fixed to the skin with steri-strip and sterile dressing.
During the procedure we administer in a protocol basis the NSAD and thirty minutes before the end of the surgery we administer morphine. In the postoperative period the patient receives a NSAD regime and a PCA morphine treatment.
The catheter is withdrawn after 48 hours and also the PCA and the analgesic treatment is with NSAD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ropivacaine
After a bolus administration of Ropivacaine a perfusion ot the same anesthetic is initiated through an elastomeric wound during 48 hours
ropivacaine
Laparotomy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus ropivacaine 0,75% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,38% at a 5ml/h.
Laparoscopy of colorectal surgery: 5 ml bolus ropivacaine 0,75% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,38% at a 2 ml/h.
Hepatic surgery: 10 ml de ropivacaine 0,45% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,23 at a 5ml/h.
saline solution
After a bolus administration of saline solution a perfusion ot saline solution is initiated through an elastomeric wound during 48 hours
saline solution
Laparotomy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 5ml/h.
Laparoscopy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 2 ml/h.
Hepatic surgery: 10 ml de saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 5ml/h
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ropivacaine
Laparotomy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus ropivacaine 0,75% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,38% at a 5ml/h.
Laparoscopy of colorectal surgery: 5 ml bolus ropivacaine 0,75% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,38% at a 2 ml/h.
Hepatic surgery: 10 ml de ropivacaine 0,45% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,23 at a 5ml/h.
saline solution
Laparotomy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 5ml/h.
Laparoscopy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 2 ml/h.
Hepatic surgery: 10 ml de saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 5ml/h
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing scheduled colorectal cancer and hepatic surgery
* Patients must be able to understand the PCA (the self administration system)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with epidural catheter or receiving combined analgesia during surgery (age above 80, moderate-severe respiratory dysfunction, patients who prior presented complex postoperative pain management.
* Emergency surgery
* Patients with risk of hepatic insufficiency (Klatskin's tumor, extended right hepatectomy, right hepatectomy in patients with steatosis, hepatic resection in patients over 70 years of age who have been given chemotherapy).
* Inflammatory bowel disease: ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease.
* Major psychiatric condition.
* Patients with active drug addiction or on chronic treatment with opiates.
* Morbid obesity (BMI \> 35 kg/m2)
* Patients with heart disease (myocardiopathy, conduction alterations, antiarrhythmic treatment) and severe liver disease (alteration synthesis, histolysis and or cholestasis).
* Patients with kidney failure.
* Patients treated with fluvoxamine (antidepressant) and enoxacin (antibiotic) both are potent inhibitors of CYPIA2.
* Septic patients
* Patients that do not wish to participate.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
antonia dalmau llitjos
MD PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antònia Dalmau Llitjós, Physical D
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Univeritary Hospital of Bellvitge. IDIBELL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anesthesiology Service of Univeritary Hospital of Bellvitge
Hospitalet . Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, Wu CL. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):914-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.007. Epub 2006 Oct 25. No abstract available.
Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, Rollin M, Parc Y, Mazoit JX, Azizi L, Gervaz P, Rohr S, Biermann C, Lienhart A, Eledjam JJ. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):461-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19.
Wu CL, Partin AW, Rowlingson AJ, Kalish MA, Walsh PC, Fleisher LA. Efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infusion for postoperative pain after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):366-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.02.030.
Gupta A, Perniola A, Axelsson K, Thorn SE, Crafoord K, Rawal N. Postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind comparison between placebo and local anesthetic infused intraperitoneally. Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct;99(4):1173-1179. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130260.24433.A2.
Zohar E, Fredman B, Phillipov A, Jedeikin R, Shapiro A. The analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled bupivacaine wound instillation after total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Anesth Analg. 2001 Aug;93(2):482-7, 4th contents page. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200108000-00048.
Fredman B, Zohar E, Tarabykin A, Shapiro A, Mayo A, Klein E, Jedeikin R. Bupivacaine wound instillation via an electronic patient-controlled analgesia device and a double-catheter system does not decrease postoperative pain or opioid requirements after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):189-93. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00036.
Chester JF, Ravindranath K, White BD, Shanahan D, Taylor RS, Lloyd-Williams K. Wound perfusion with bupivacaine: objective evidence for efficacy in postoperative pain relief. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Nov;71(6):394-6.
Baig MK, Zmora O, Derdemezi J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Use of the ON-Q pain management system is associated with decreased postoperative analgesic requirement: double blind randomized placebo pilot study. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Feb;202(2):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANESTHESIA SERVICE HUB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.