Treatment Efficacy and Toxicity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Database and Repository
NCT ID: NCT01070121
Last Updated: 2015-10-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-02-28
2012-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chronic Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT05038553
Gene-Environment Interactions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Autoimmunity Disease Severity
NCT00594451
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Myositis Cohort
NCT05627089
Health Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT00346411
Identification of New Biomarkers to Promote Personalized Treatment of Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
NCT03214263
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of concomitant MTX and biologic agents has dramatically improved the outcomes of RA treatment in the US. This proposal is based on the premise the next major advance needed in the treatment of RA is not additional drugs, but rather a dramatic improvement in the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the use of drugs for individual patients with RA. One of the hopes for modern medicine is the realization of "personalized" medicine, which allows accurate, quick prediction of which drug will be the most efficacious, least toxic, and least expensive for an individual patient.
One of the major obstacles to identifying clinically useful markers of treatment response in RA is the lack of cohorts with prospectively collected treatment response data coupled with biological samples. Because of the importance of this issue and the paucity of funding for such efforts, multiple efforts to establish single institution (using institutional funds) or multisite cohorts and repositories (typically dependent on private practitioners and pharmaceutical company support) are planned. To date, there has been no attempt to harmonize the efforts of the US academic RA research community to create a public resource.
Recognizing that building de novo cohorts within a short time frame is not feasible, our current proposal will fill a critical need: establishing an infrastructure of academic investigators to lay the foundation for future collaborative large-scale registries; and uniting the efforts of many organizations with the common goal of improving care of RA patients. This project will facilitate future research that will result in significant, publicly visible improvements in health care. Identifying predictors of treatment response in RA will lead to rapid, early institution of optimal drugs rather than a "hit or miss" sequential approach; reduce adverse events; improve patient compliance; and lead to substantial reduction in the cost of health care. By unifying the efforts of academic researchers, we can create unique resources, such as a bank of cryopreserved blood cells to allow sophisticated immunologic research to dissect molecular signals of successful treatment of RA.
In order to determine the feasibility of this infrastructure for prospectively collecting data and samples we will enroll a small number of participants (10/site/year for each of 2 years, for a total of 200 participants).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RA patients/participants
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of RA based on the cumulative presence of at least 4 of 7 ACR Criteria;
3. Willing and able to provide informed consent; and
One of the following:
* Starting MTX OR
* Previous or current use of Methotrexate and starting (or switching to) any of the following medications (with or without MTX)
* Etanercept
* Infliximab
* Adalimumab
* Rituximab
* Abatacept
* Golimumab
* Certolizumab
* Tocilizumab
There is no minimum disease activity (number of swollen joints, DAS28, CRP or ESR, etc.) necessary for enrollment. Treatment decisions are entirely at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist.
There are no combinations of drugs to be excluded, except those that do not include at least one of the seven drugs noted above.
Use of corticosteroids (oral, parenteral, intra-articular) is allowed, but must be recorded.
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Duke University
OTHER
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
North Shore Medical Center
OTHER
Stanford University
OTHER
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
University of Nebraska
OTHER
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
S. Louis Bridges, MD, PhD
Director, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
S. Louis Bridges, Jr., MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of Colorado in Denver
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
North Shore Medical Center (LIJ Health System)
Lake Success, New York, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ormseth MJ, Yancey PG, Solus JF, Bridges SL Jr, Curtis JR, Linton MF, Fazio S, Davies SS, Roberts LJ 2nd, Vickers KC, Kon V, Michael Stein C; TETRAD Investigators. Effect of Drug Therapy on Net Cholesterol Efflux Capacity of High-Density Lipoprotein-Enriched Serum in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Sep;68(9):2099-105. doi: 10.1002/art.39675.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F091007003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.