Treatment Efficacy and Toxicity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Database and Repository

NCT ID: NCT01070121

Last Updated: 2015-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To stimulate collaborative efforts of federal funding agencies, voluntary health agencies, professional organizations and industry partners to enable creation of a large, sustainable database and repository to better understand the molecular basis of treatment and rapidly accelerate translational research in RA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory arthritis, affecting \~1% of the US population. Severity of RA varies from mild synovitis to joint destruction with associated disability and increased mortality. Methotrexate (MTX) is the major drug used to treat RA and the anchor drug for clinical trials of investigational new drugs (INDs) in RA. Eight biologic agents are currently FDA-approved for RA. No drug is effective in every patient, and there is great variability in toxicity and price.

The use of concomitant MTX and biologic agents has dramatically improved the outcomes of RA treatment in the US. This proposal is based on the premise the next major advance needed in the treatment of RA is not additional drugs, but rather a dramatic improvement in the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the use of drugs for individual patients with RA. One of the hopes for modern medicine is the realization of "personalized" medicine, which allows accurate, quick prediction of which drug will be the most efficacious, least toxic, and least expensive for an individual patient.

One of the major obstacles to identifying clinically useful markers of treatment response in RA is the lack of cohorts with prospectively collected treatment response data coupled with biological samples. Because of the importance of this issue and the paucity of funding for such efforts, multiple efforts to establish single institution (using institutional funds) or multisite cohorts and repositories (typically dependent on private practitioners and pharmaceutical company support) are planned. To date, there has been no attempt to harmonize the efforts of the US academic RA research community to create a public resource.

Recognizing that building de novo cohorts within a short time frame is not feasible, our current proposal will fill a critical need: establishing an infrastructure of academic investigators to lay the foundation for future collaborative large-scale registries; and uniting the efforts of many organizations with the common goal of improving care of RA patients. This project will facilitate future research that will result in significant, publicly visible improvements in health care. Identifying predictors of treatment response in RA will lead to rapid, early institution of optimal drugs rather than a "hit or miss" sequential approach; reduce adverse events; improve patient compliance; and lead to substantial reduction in the cost of health care. By unifying the efforts of academic researchers, we can create unique resources, such as a bank of cryopreserved blood cells to allow sophisticated immunologic research to dissect molecular signals of successful treatment of RA.

In order to determine the feasibility of this infrastructure for prospectively collecting data and samples we will enroll a small number of participants (10/site/year for each of 2 years, for a total of 200 participants).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RA patients/participants

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 19 years or older;
2. Diagnosis of RA based on the cumulative presence of at least 4 of 7 ACR Criteria;
3. Willing and able to provide informed consent; and

One of the following:

* Starting MTX OR
* Previous or current use of Methotrexate and starting (or switching to) any of the following medications (with or without MTX)

* Etanercept
* Infliximab
* Adalimumab
* Rituximab
* Abatacept
* Golimumab
* Certolizumab
* Tocilizumab

There is no minimum disease activity (number of swollen joints, DAS28, CRP or ESR, etc.) necessary for enrollment. Treatment decisions are entirely at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist.

There are no combinations of drugs to be excluded, except those that do not include at least one of the seven drugs noted above.

Use of corticosteroids (oral, parenteral, intra-articular) is allowed, but must be recorded.

Exclusion Criteria

Concomitant diagnosis of RA and systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, hepatitis C infection, current pregnancy or lactation.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Shore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

S. Louis Bridges, MD, PhD

Director, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

S. Louis Bridges, Jr., MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado in Denver

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

North Shore Medical Center (LIJ Health System)

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ormseth MJ, Yancey PG, Solus JF, Bridges SL Jr, Curtis JR, Linton MF, Fazio S, Davies SS, Roberts LJ 2nd, Vickers KC, Kon V, Michael Stein C; TETRAD Investigators. Effect of Drug Therapy on Net Cholesterol Efflux Capacity of High-Density Lipoprotein-Enriched Serum in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Sep;68(9):2099-105. doi: 10.1002/art.39675.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26991245 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F091007003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.