Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic Burkholderia Species Infection

NCT ID: NCT01059565

Last Updated: 2014-03-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2012-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study was to determine if an experimental drug called Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) was safe and effective to treat Burkholderia lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function, and the revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) was used to assess quality of life. The CFQ-R is a validated, patient-reported outcome tool used to measure health-related quality of life for children and adults with CF.

The study consisted of a 24-week randomized phase, and a 24-week open-label phase. Primary and secondary efficacy analyses were conducted for the 24-week randomized phase only. Safety data were collected for both the randomized and open-label phases.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cystic Fibrosis Burkholderia Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AZLI

Participants were randomized to receive AZLI for up to 24 weeks and may have continued to receive AZLI during the open-label phase for up to an additional 24 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZLI

Intervention Type DRUG

Aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI; 75 mg aztreonam/52.5 mg lysine monohydrate) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.

Placebo

Participants were randomized to receive placebo to match AZLI for up to 24 weeks and may have switched to AZLI during the open-label phase for up to 24 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to match AZLI (lactose and sodium chloride) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AZLI

Aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI; 75 mg aztreonam/52.5 mg lysine monohydrate) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo to match AZLI (lactose and sodium chloride) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female ≥ 6 years of age
2. Subjects with CF as diagnosed by one of the following:

* Documented sweat chloride ≥ 60 milliequivalent (mEq)/L by quantitative pilocarpine iontophoresis test
* Documented sweat sodium ≥ 60 mmol/L
* Two well-characterized genetic mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene
* Abnormal nasal potential difference (NPD) with accompanying symptoms characteristic of CF
3. Chronic infection with Burkholderia spp. defined by:

* One sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) culture positive for Burkholderia spp. within 6 months prior to baseline assessment,
* At least 50% of sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) cultures collected at least one month apart over the previous 12 months prior to baseline assessment positive for Burkholderia spp. (minimum of 2 positive cultures), and
* At least one positive sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) culture (obtained at any point in time) confirmed to be Burkholderia spp. by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) Burkholderia cepacia Research Laboratory and Repository at the University of Michigan (or equivalent Canadian reference laboratory).
4. Concomitant aerosolized antibiotic treatment: subjects receiving intermittent (alternating month on/month off) aerosolized antibiotic treatment were eligible, but must have been at least 1 week into their off-treatment cycle at the time of baseline assessment. Subjects receiving continuous aerosolized antibiotic treatment were eligible without restriction on their aerosolized antibiotic treatment.
5. Chest radiograph, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (most recent, obtained within 90 days of screening) without significant acute findings (eg, infiltrates \[lobar or diffuse interstitial\], pleural effusion, pneumothorax), and no significant intercurrent illness; chronic, stable findings (eg, chronic scarring or atelectasis) were allowed.
6. Subjects (and parent/guardian as required) must have been able to provide written informed consent/assent prior to any study-related procedures,
7. Ability to perform reproducible pulmonary function tests
8. Sexually active females of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective method of contraception during heterosexual intercourse throughout the study period and for 30 days following discontinuation of study drug. A highly effective method of birth control was defined as a method that would result in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices (IUDs), or a vasectomized partner.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Administration of any investigational drug or use of any investigational device within 28 days of randomization/baseline and within six half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever is longer)
2. Administration of AZLI treatment within the 28 days prior to randomization/baseline
3. Known local or systemic hypersensitivity to monobactam antibiotics
4. History of lung transplantation
5. Abnormal renal or hepatic function results at most recent test within the previous 90 days, defined as:

* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 5 times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
* Serum creatinine \> 2 times ULN
6. Known portal hypertension or complications of CF hepatopathy
7. Positive urine pregnancy test (confirmed by serum pregnancy test) at screening; all women of childbearing potential were tested
8. Any female of childbearing potential who was lactating or not practicing a highly effective method of birth control as defined in the protocol
9. Any serious or active medical or psychiatric illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with subject treatment, assessment or compliance with the protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gilead Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Bresnik, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gilead Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Glenview, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GS-US-205-0127

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.