Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic Burkholderia Species Infection
NCT ID: NCT01059565
Last Updated: 2014-03-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2012-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function, and the revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) was used to assess quality of life. The CFQ-R is a validated, patient-reported outcome tool used to measure health-related quality of life for children and adults with CF.
The study consisted of a 24-week randomized phase, and a 24-week open-label phase. Primary and secondary efficacy analyses were conducted for the 24-week randomized phase only. Safety data were collected for both the randomized and open-label phases.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
International Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Cystic Fibrosis Patients With P. Aeruginosa
NCT00112359
Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis, Mild Lung Disease, and P. Aeruginosa
NCT00712166
Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Cystic Fibrosis Patients With P. Aeruginosa
NCT00104520
Phase 3 Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in a Continuous Alternating Therapy Regimen for the Treatment of Chronic Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection in Patients With CF
NCT01641822
Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Patients With Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PA)
NCT00128492
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AZLI
Participants were randomized to receive AZLI for up to 24 weeks and may have continued to receive AZLI during the open-label phase for up to an additional 24 weeks.
AZLI
Aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI; 75 mg aztreonam/52.5 mg lysine monohydrate) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive placebo to match AZLI for up to 24 weeks and may have switched to AZLI during the open-label phase for up to 24 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo to match AZLI (lactose and sodium chloride) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AZLI
Aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI; 75 mg aztreonam/52.5 mg lysine monohydrate) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.
Placebo
Placebo to match AZLI (lactose and sodium chloride) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects with CF as diagnosed by one of the following:
* Documented sweat chloride ≥ 60 milliequivalent (mEq)/L by quantitative pilocarpine iontophoresis test
* Documented sweat sodium ≥ 60 mmol/L
* Two well-characterized genetic mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene
* Abnormal nasal potential difference (NPD) with accompanying symptoms characteristic of CF
3. Chronic infection with Burkholderia spp. defined by:
* One sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) culture positive for Burkholderia spp. within 6 months prior to baseline assessment,
* At least 50% of sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) cultures collected at least one month apart over the previous 12 months prior to baseline assessment positive for Burkholderia spp. (minimum of 2 positive cultures), and
* At least one positive sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) culture (obtained at any point in time) confirmed to be Burkholderia spp. by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) Burkholderia cepacia Research Laboratory and Repository at the University of Michigan (or equivalent Canadian reference laboratory).
4. Concomitant aerosolized antibiotic treatment: subjects receiving intermittent (alternating month on/month off) aerosolized antibiotic treatment were eligible, but must have been at least 1 week into their off-treatment cycle at the time of baseline assessment. Subjects receiving continuous aerosolized antibiotic treatment were eligible without restriction on their aerosolized antibiotic treatment.
5. Chest radiograph, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (most recent, obtained within 90 days of screening) without significant acute findings (eg, infiltrates \[lobar or diffuse interstitial\], pleural effusion, pneumothorax), and no significant intercurrent illness; chronic, stable findings (eg, chronic scarring or atelectasis) were allowed.
6. Subjects (and parent/guardian as required) must have been able to provide written informed consent/assent prior to any study-related procedures,
7. Ability to perform reproducible pulmonary function tests
8. Sexually active females of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective method of contraception during heterosexual intercourse throughout the study period and for 30 days following discontinuation of study drug. A highly effective method of birth control was defined as a method that would result in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices (IUDs), or a vasectomized partner.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Administration of AZLI treatment within the 28 days prior to randomization/baseline
3. Known local or systemic hypersensitivity to monobactam antibiotics
4. History of lung transplantation
5. Abnormal renal or hepatic function results at most recent test within the previous 90 days, defined as:
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 5 times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
* Serum creatinine \> 2 times ULN
6. Known portal hypertension or complications of CF hepatopathy
7. Positive urine pregnancy test (confirmed by serum pregnancy test) at screening; all women of childbearing potential were tested
8. Any female of childbearing potential who was lactating or not practicing a highly effective method of birth control as defined in the protocol
9. Any serious or active medical or psychiatric illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with subject treatment, assessment or compliance with the protocol
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gilead Sciences
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark Bresnik, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Gilead Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Denver, Colorado, United States
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
Glenview, Illinois, United States
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Akron, Ohio, United States
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Portland, Oregon, United States
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GS-US-205-0127
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.