Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
448 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients who participate as subjects in the study will undergo two complete colonoscopy procedures, a standard colonoscopy and a colonoscopy in which a Third Eye Retroscope is used along with the same colonoscope. Half of the patients will have the standard colonoscopy first followed by the Third Eye colonoscopy, and the other half will have the Third Eye procedure first.
Results from the two groups will be analyzed and compared to determine the effectiveness of the Third Eye Retroscope for detecting additional adenomas and other polyps compared with the standard colonoscope alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Third Eye Panoramic Device Feasibility Evaluation
NCT02368977
Inspection of the Colon Using a Retrograde Viewing Device for Detection of Colorectal Polyps
NCT04107376
Retroview™ Colonoscope and Lesion Detection Rate
NCT03155165
Feasibility Study of a Novel Single Use Robotic Colonoscopy System
NCT03979690
Use of a Novel Camera to Check the Bowel After Polyp or Tumour Removal
NCT07341126
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Third Eye® Retroscope® is a device that can be inserted through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope to provide an additional, retrograde (or backward) view that reveals areas behind folds and flexures in the colon. Previous studies have shown the device to be effective for detecting additional polyps that could not have been seen with the colonoscope alone.
The purpose of this research is to compare the additional diagnostic yield obtained by using the Third Eye® Retroscope® vs. the diagnostic yield for the standard colonoscope alone in the context of a randomized, controlled study design.
Patients who are scheduled for colonoscopy will be recruited to the study and randomized to one of two groups. Each patient will undergo two "back-to-back" procedures.
Patients in Group A (study group) will undergo a standard colonoscopy followed immediately by a Third Eye colonoscopy.
Patients in Group B (control group) will undergo a Third Eye colonoscopy followed immediately by a standard colonoscopy.
Results from the two groups will be analyzed and compared to determine the effectiveness of the Third Eye Retroscope for detecting additional adenomas and other polyps compared with the standard colonoscope alone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A - COLO, then TER
Complete examination with standard colonoscope ("COLO") followed by complete examination with Third Eye Retroscope ("TER") used in conjunction with standard colonoscope
Third Eye Retroscope
Device used with colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon
Group B - TER, then COLO
Complete examination with Third Eye Retroscope ("TER") used in conjunction with standard colonoscope, followed by complete examination with standard colonoscope ("COLO") alone
Third Eye Retroscope
Device used with colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Third Eye Retroscope
Device used with colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient must understand and provide written consent for the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with inflammatory bowel disease;
* Patients with a personal history of polyposis syndrome;
* Patients with suspected chronic stricture potentially precluding complete colonoscopy;
* Patients with diverticulitis or toxic megacolon;
* Patients with a history of radiation therapy to abdomen or pelvis;
* Patients who are currently enrolled in another clinical investigation in which the intervention might compromise the safety of the patient's participation in this study.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Avantis Medical Systems
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter D. Siersema, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Kansas City Veterans Administration Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Bayside Endoscopy Center
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, , Belgium
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Milan, , Italy
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
St. Mark's Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Leufkens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A, Akerman PA, Azzouzi K, Rothstein RI, Vleggaar FP, Repici A, Rando G, Okolo PI, Dewit O, Ignjatovic A, Odstrcil E, East J, Deprez PH, Saunders BP, Kalloo AN, Creel B, Singh V, Lennon AM, Siersema PD; Third Eye Retroscope Randomized Clinical Evaluation [TERRACE] Study Group. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Siersema PD, Rastogi A, Leufkens AM, Akerman PA, Azzouzi K, Rothstein RI, Vleggaar FP, Repici A, Rando G, Okolo PI, Dewit O, Ignjatovic A, Odstrcil E, East J, Deprez PH, Saunders BP, Kalloo AN, Creel B, Singh V, Lennon AM, DeMarco DC. Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 14;18(26):3400-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Avantis TER-08-06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.